The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species identification and decay assessment of Late Pleistocene fragmentary vertebrate remains from Pin Hole Cave (Creswell Crags, UK ) using collagen fingerprinting
Abstract
Ancient bone remains are widely utilized when investigating vertebrate biodiversity of past animal populations but are often so highly fragmented that the majority of specimens cannot be identified to any meaningful taxonomic level. Recently, high‐throughput methods for objective species identification using collagen peptide mass fingerprinting have been created to overcome this with the added indication that they could also offer a means of relative ageing through decay measurement. Here we explore both species identification and decay measurements for the Pin Hole Cave ‘microfaunal’ assemblage, the site that has been designated as a representative for Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 in Britain in terms of its suite of mammalian fauna. We explore the technique's potential to corroborate the faunal diversity established previously by macroscopic studies and evaluate the decay measurements across the species boundary. The results support that the analysis of fragmentary remains by collagen fingerprinting can yield a more diverse set of fauna, and offer additional information relating to taphonomy, than the analysis of morphologically intact bones on their own. However, although useful for identifying likely contaminations of an assemblage, there was an unexpected decrease in the decay measurements observed for some megafauna compared with much younger microfauna, indicating that other factors need to be carefully monitored before it could be used as a relative ageing technique in Quaternary deposits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ZooMS has been applied to understanding past ecologies and environments through expansion of zooarcheological identifications in archeological assemblages, particularly useful for highly fragmented bone assemblages.
“ZooMS has also been applied to understanding past ecologies and environments through the expansion of zooarcheological identifications in archeological assemblages, an approach that can be particularly useful when examining highly fragmented bone assemblages (95–97).”
From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mid-Pliocene warm-period deposits in the high arctic yield insight into camel evolution
Rybczynski, N., Gosse, J. C., Richard Harington, C., Wogelius, R. A., Hidy, A. J., & Buckley, M. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2516 · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.10.033 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0958841800026156 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1137614 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr900349r · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1969.tb08451.x · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.076091.108 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms17040445 · DOI
- 10.4081/antiqua.2011.e1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12520-011-0066-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0139611 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.7483 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.022 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1147046 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330870311 · DOI
- 10.1002/oa.848 · DOI
- 10.1179/174963108X343281 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00035-X · DOI
- Discamps E., 2012, Human and Hyena co‐occurrences in Pleistocene sites: Insights from spatial, faunal and lithic analyses at Camiac and La Chauverie (SW France), Journal of Taphonomy, 10, 291
- 10.1520/JFS11635J · DOI
- 10.1080/10635150590923326 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2009.11.029 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-77001-2_5 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0150650 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1989.tb01015.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033822200066388 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00368.x · DOI
- 10.2307/281496 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1417(199801/02)13:1<29::AID-JQS346>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
- Jenkinson R., 1984, Creswell Crags: Late Pleistocene Sites in the East Midlands, British Archaeological Reports British Series, 122, 371
- Jenkinson R., 1989, The archaeological caves of Creswell crags, Cave Science, 16, 91
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0002808 · DOI
- Keil B., 2012, Specificity of Proteolysis, 43
- 10.1179/lev.2005.37.1.221 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139878302 · DOI
- 10.1006/jasc.1999.0537 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-152808-9.50013-4 · DOI
- Rowe P., 1989, Uranium‐series dating of cave deposits at Creswell Crags Gorge, England, Cave Science, 16, 3
- 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00033-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.7445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1165069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.6821 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac301333t · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1982.tb00007.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ancient protein analysis in archaeology
Hendy, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb9314 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, M., Harvey, V. L., & Chamberlain, A. T.
- Affiliations
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester Institute of Biotechnology Manchester M1 7DN UK
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Stopford Building Manchester M13 9PT UK
- Venue
- Boreas
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-13
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 402-411
- ISSN
- 0300-9483
- 1502-3885
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H015132/1)
- Royal Society (UF120473)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review