Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Species identification and decay assessment of Late Pleistocene fragmentary vertebrate remains from Pin Hole Cave (Creswell Crags, UK ) using collagen fingerprinting

Buckley, Michael, Harvey, Virginia L., Chamberlain, Andrew T.·2017·Boreas

Abstract

Ancient bone remains are widely utilized when investigating vertebrate biodiversity of past animal populations but are often so highly fragmented that the majority of specimens cannot be identified to any meaningful taxonomic level. Recently, high‐throughput methods for objective species identification using collagen peptide mass fingerprinting have been created to overcome this with the added indication that they could also offer a means of relative ageing through decay measurement. Here we explore both species identification and decay measurements for the Pin Hole Cave ‘microfaunal’ assemblage, the site that has been designated as a representative for Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage 3 in Britain in terms of its suite of mammalian fauna. We explore the technique's potential to corroborate the faunal diversity established previously by macroscopic studies and evaluate the decay measurements across the species boundary. The results support that the analysis of fragmentary remains by collagen fingerprinting can yield a more diverse set of fauna, and offer additional information relating to taphonomy, than the analysis of morphologically intact bones on their own. However, although useful for identifying likely contaminations of an assemblage, there was an unexpected decrease in the decay measurements observed for some megafauna compared with much younger microfauna, indicating that other factors need to be carefully monitored before it could be used as a relative ageing technique in Quaternary deposits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bor.12225

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ZooMS has been applied to understanding past ecologies and environments through expansion of zooarcheological identifications in archeological assemblages, particularly useful for highly fragmented bone assemblages.

    “ZooMS has also been applied to understanding past ecologies and environments through the expansion of zooarcheological identifications in archeological assemblages, an approach that can be particularly useful when examining highly fragmented bone assemblages (95–97).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [95]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.10.033 · DOI
  2. 10.1017/S0958841800026156 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1137614 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1021/pr900349r · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1969.tb08451.x · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gr.076091.108 · DOI
  7. 10.3390/ijms17040445 · DOI
  8. 10.4081/antiqua.2011.e1 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s12520-011-0066-z · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.002 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139611 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.021 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/rcm.7483 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.022 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.1147046 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/ajpa.1330870311 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/oa.848 · DOI
  20. 10.1179/174963108X343281 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00035-X · DOI
  22. Discamps E., 2012, Human and Hyena co‐occurrences in Pleistocene sites: Insights from spatial, faunal and lithic analyses at Camiac and La Chauverie (SW France), Journal of Taphonomy, 10, 291
  23. 10.1520/JFS11635J · DOI
  24. 10.1080/10635150590923326 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jas.2009.11.029 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-642-77001-2_5 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150650 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1989.tb01015.x · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0033822200066388 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00368.x · DOI
  31. 10.2307/281496 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1417(199801/02)13:1<29::AID-JQS346>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  33. Jenkinson R., 1984, Creswell Crags: Late Pleistocene Sites in the East Midlands, British Archaeological Reports British Series, 122, 371
  34. Jenkinson R., 1989, The archaeological caves of Creswell crags, Cave Science, 16, 91
  35. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002808 · DOI
  36. Keil B., 2012, Specificity of Proteolysis, 43
  37. 10.1179/lev.2005.37.1.221 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.08.007 · DOI
  39. 10.1017/CBO9781139878302 · DOI
  40. 10.1006/jasc.1999.0537 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.014 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/B978-0-12-152808-9.50013-4 · DOI
  43. Rowe P., 1989, Uranium‐series dating of cave deposits at Creswell Crags Gorge, England, Cave Science, 16, 3
  44. 10.1016/S0277-3791(01)00033-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/rcm.7445 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1126/science.1165069 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.10.010 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/rcm.6821 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/ac301333t · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1982.tb00007.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buckley, M., Harvey, V. L., & Chamberlain, A. T.
Affiliations
  • School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester Institute of Biotechnology Manchester M1 7DN UK
  • School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Stopford Building Manchester M13 9PT UK
Venue
Boreas
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-13
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
402-411
ISSN
  • 0300-9483
  • 1502-3885
Cited by
93
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H015132/1)
  • Royal Society (UF120473)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review