Developmental origins of cognitive offloading
Open accessAbstract
Many animals manipulate their environments in ways that appear to augment cognitive processing. Adult humans show remarkable flexibility in this domain, typically relying on internal cognitive processing when adequate but turning to external support in situations of high internal demand. We use calendars, calculators, navigational aids and other external means to compensate for our natural cognitive shortcomings and achieve otherwise unattainable feats of intelligence. As yet, however, the developmental origins of this fundamental capacity for cognitive offloading remain largely unknown. In two studies, children aged 4–11 years (n= 258) were given an opportunity to manually rotate a turntable to eliminate the internal demands of mental rotation––to solve the problem in the world rather than in their heads. In study 1, even the youngest children showed a linear relationship between mental rotation demand and likelihood of using the external strategy, paralleling the classic relationship between angle of mental rotation and reaction time. In study 2, children were introduced to a version of the task where manually rotating inverted stimuli was sometimes beneficial to performance and other times redundant. With increasing age, children were significantly more likely to manually rotate the turntable only when it would benefit them. These results show how humans gradually calibrate their cognitive offloading strategies throughout childhood and thereby uncover the developmental origins of this central facet of intelligence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children already selectively use tools to overcome cognitive limitations.
“Recent findings revealed that already children selectively use tools to overcome cognitive limitations (Armitage et al., 2020; Bulley et al., 2020).”
From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Armitage et al., 2020
Cites
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 5,457 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Most prominently, Clark & Chalmers ’ [8] extended mind thesis describes cognition as a cohesive system consisting of both internal processes and interactions with the external environment that facilitate performance on cognitive tasks.”
BackgroundGoogle Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1207745 · Cited by 1,762 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In time, results could inform interventions aimed at improving selectivity and reducing the potentially deleterious effects of overreliance [39,65,66].”
BackgroundRisko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 · Cited by 1,502 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…account of children ’ s performance is consistent with findings from studies with adult participants, who deploy external manipulations not only as a function of the actual benefit of reducing internal demand, but also as a function of the believed benefit of reducing internal demand [14,31,34].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialInfants ask for help when they know they don’t know
Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1515129113 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
The study of animal metacognition
Smith, J. D. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.009 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Storing information in-the-world: Metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task
Risko, E. F., & Dunn, T. L. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.014 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Saving-Enhanced Memory: The Benefits of Saving on the Learning and Remembering of New Information
Storm, B. C., & Stone, S. M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614559285 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Domain-general enhancements of metacognitive ability through adaptive training.
Carpenter, J., Sherman, M. T., Kievit, R. A., Seth, A. K., Lau, H., & Fleming, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000505 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment
Gilbert, S. J. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.972963 · Cited by 164 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Therefore, if children ’ s likelihood of engaging in cognitive offloading is driven by the internal demand of the task, as in adults [14,33,57], then they should be more likely to manually rotate the turntable as the angular disparity between the upright and rotated figure increases.”
BackgroundToward a Metacognitive Account of Cognitive Offloading
Dunn, T. L., & Risko, E. F. (2016) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12273 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory
Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F., & Meyerhoff, H. S. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211008060 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Recent findings revealed that already children selectively use tools to overcome cognitive limitations (Armitage et al., 2020; Bulley et al., 2020).”
BackgroundOutsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of ‘Intention Offloading’
Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C., & Tsai, P.-C. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization
Skulmowski, A. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“…on non-digital forms of externalization is used to demonstrate how deeply embedded the tendency of offloading is in humans, with several studies on issues besides learning and memory often showing considerable advantages accrued using this strategy (e.g., Armitage et al., 2020; Dunn & Risko, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSun, J., Wang, Y., Hu, Z., Liu, Y., & Sun, Y. (2025) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12540 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Armitage, K. L., Bulley, A., & Redshaw, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Armitage, Kristy L.
- Redshaw, Jonathan
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2020-06-10
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 1928
- Pages
- 20192927
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC7341915
- OpenAlex
- W3033923944
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1162811)
- University of Queensland (UQFEL1832633)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- cognitive offloading, external cognition, mental rotation, developmental origins, children, cognitive strategy use, manual rotation, intelligence, cognitive demand, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review