Cited by 51Spatial Cognition and NavigationChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Developmental origins of cognitive offloading

Open access
Armitage, Kristy L., Bulley, Adam, Redshaw, Jonathan·2020·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Many animals manipulate their environments in ways that appear to augment cognitive processing. Adult humans show remarkable flexibility in this domain, typically relying on internal cognitive processing when adequate but turning to external support in situations of high internal demand. We use calendars, calculators, navigational aids and other external means to compensate for our natural cognitive shortcomings and achieve otherwise unattainable feats of intelligence. As yet, however, the developmental origins of this fundamental capacity for cognitive offloading remain largely unknown. In two studies, children aged 4–11 years (n= 258) were given an opportunity to manually rotate a turntable to eliminate the internal demands of mental rotation––to solve the problem in the world rather than in their heads. In study 1, even the youngest children showed a linear relationship between mental rotation demand and likelihood of using the external strategy, paralleling the classic relationship between angle of mental rotation and reaction time. In study 2, children were introduced to a version of the task where manually rotating inverted stimuli was sometimes beneficial to performance and other times redundant. With increasing age, children were significantly more likely to manually rotate the turntable only when it would benefit them. These results show how humans gradually calibrate their cognitive offloading strategies throughout childhood and thereby uncover the developmental origins of this central facet of intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2019.2927

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children already selectively use tools to overcome cognitive limitations.

    “Recent findings revealed that already children selectively use tools to overcome cognitive limitations (Armitage et al., 2020; Bulley et al., 2020).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Armitage et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armitage, K. L., Bulley, A., & Redshaw, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Armitage, Kristy L.
  • Redshaw, Jonathan
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2020-06-10
Volume
287
Issue
1928
Pages
20192927
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W3033923944
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1162811)
  • University of Queensland (UQFEL1832633)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
cognitive offloading, external cognition, mental rotation, developmental origins, children, cognitive strategy use, manual rotation, intelligence, cognitive demand, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review