Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Given the foreseeable pervasiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in modern societies, it is legitimate and necessary to ask the question how this new technology must be shaped to support the maintenance and strengthening of constitutional democracy. This paper first describes the four core elements of today's digital power concentration, which need to be seen in cumulation and which, seen together, are both a threat to democracy and to functioning markets. It then recalls the experience with the lawless Internet and the relationship between technology and the law as it has developed in the Internet economy and the experience with GDPR before it moves on to the key question for AI in democracy, namely which of the challenges of AI can be safely and with good conscience left to ethics, and which challenges of AI need to be addressed by rules which are enforceable and encompass the legitimacy of democratic process, thus laws. The paper closes with a call for a new culture of incorporating the principles of democracy, rule of law and human rights by design in AI and a three-level technological impact assessment for new technologies like AI as a practical way forward for this purpose. This article is part of a theme issue ‘Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal, and technical opportunities and challenges’.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Serious, long-term commitment to self-regulatory frameworks cannot be taken for granted.
“Serious, long-term commitment to self-regulatory frameworks cannot be taken for granted.”
From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 · Cited by 1,886 · see citing works
Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges
Cath, C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0080 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
FactSheets: Increasing trust in AI services through supplier's declarations of conformity
Arnold, M., Bellamy, R. K. E., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nair, R., Ramamurthy, K. N., Olteanu, A., Piorkowski, D., et al. (2019) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2019.2942288 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Cheong, B. C. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2024.1421273 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Lessons learned from AI ethics principles for future actions
Hickok, M. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00008-1 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Borgesius, F. Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13465 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“See also Nemitz 2018.”
Artificial intelligence in fiction: between narratives and metaphors
Hermann, I. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Responsible AI: Requirements and challenges
Ghallab, M. (2019) · AI Perspectives · doi:10.1186/s42467-019-0003-z · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence
Coeckelbergh, M. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Possible harms of Artificial Intelligence and the EU AI Act: fundamental rights and risk
Kusche, I. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2350720 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
AI Ethics – Too Principled to Fail?
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391293 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities
(2023) · Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
From computer ethics and the ethics of AI towards an ethics of digital ecosystems
Stahl, B. C. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00080-1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Sigfrids, A., Nieminen, M., Leikas, J., & Pikkuaho, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2022.858108 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“The selected articles were then analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, following the steps suggested by Nowell et al. (2017).”
MethodTowards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard
Kuźniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., Górski, L., Winogradska, B., & Zeldenrust, R. (2022) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/2yhh9pa · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nemitz, P.
- Affiliations
- European Commission (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Nemitz, Paul
- ORCID
- Nemitz, Paul
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2018-10-15
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 2133
- Pages
- 20180089
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2897614784
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 54.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, constitutional democracy, rule of law, GDPR, internet economy, AI regulation, ethics versus law, democratic legitimacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review