Cited by 418Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationArtificial Intelligence in Law

Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence

Open access
Nemitz, Paul·2018·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Given the foreseeable pervasiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in modern societies, it is legitimate and necessary to ask the question how this new technology must be shaped to support the maintenance and strengthening of constitutional democracy. This paper first describes the four core elements of today's digital power concentration, which need to be seen in cumulation and which, seen together, are both a threat to democracy and to functioning markets. It then recalls the experience with the lawless Internet and the relationship between technology and the law as it has developed in the Internet economy and the experience with GDPR before it moves on to the key question for AI in democracy, namely which of the challenges of AI can be safely and with good conscience left to ethics, and which challenges of AI need to be addressed by rules which are enforceable and encompass the legitimacy of democratic process, thus laws. The paper closes with a call for a new culture of incorporating the principles of democracy, rule of law and human rights by design in AI and a three-level technological impact assessment for new technologies like AI as a practical way forward for this purpose. This article is part of a theme issue ‘Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal, and technical opportunities and challenges’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2018.0089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serious, long-term commitment to self-regulatory frameworks cannot be taken for granted.

    “Serious, long-term commitment to self-regulatory frameworks cannot be taken for granted.”

    From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [4]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nemitz, P.
Affiliations
European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Nemitz, Paul
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2018-10-15
Volume
376
Issue
2133
Pages
20180089
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2897614784
Cited by
418
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
FWCI
54.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
Keywords
artificial intelligence, constitutional democracy, rule of law, GDPR, internet economy, AI regulation, ethics versus law, democratic legitimacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review