The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Open accessAbstract
Continuing its long history of influential scientific publishing, Philosophical Transactions A publishes high quality theme issues on topics of current importance and general interest within the physical, mathematical and engineering sciences, guest-edited by leading authorities and comprising new research, reviews and opinions from prominent researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Kaugeranna, R., Kaugeranna, E., & Aion, (. S. 4. 6. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.giscience.2023.43 · Cited by 13,690
Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K., Albert, P., Almahairi, A., Babaei, Y., Bashlykov, N., Batra, S., Bhargava, P., Bhosale, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.09288 · Cited by 2,604
Licklider, J. C. R. (1960) · IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics · doi:10.1109/thfe2.1960.4503259 · Cited by 1,938
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2706 · Cited by 1,803
Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., & Zhang, X. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01680 · Cited by 1,713
The Falcon Series of Open Language ModelsPreprint
Almazrouei, E., Alobeidli, H., Alshamsi, A., Cappelli, A., Cojocaru, R., Debbah, M. A., Goffinet, É., Hesslow, D., Launay, J., Malartic, Q., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.16867 · Cited by 953
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2176 · Cited by 932
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples
Argyle, L. P., Busby, E. C., Fulda, N., Gubler, J. R., Rytting, C., & Wingate, D. (2023) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2023.2 · Cited by 783
ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate
Chan, C.-M., Chen, W., Su, Y., Yu, J., Xue, W., Zhang, S., Fu, J., & Liu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07201 · Cited by 725
The Collaborative Image of The City: Mapping the Inequality of Urban Perception
Salesses, P., Schechtner, K., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068400 · Cited by 580
Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance
Chadwick, A. (2011) · Connecting Democracy · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9006.003.0005 · Cited by 482
Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models
Kotek, H., Dockum, R., & Sun, D. (2023) · Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference · doi:10.1145/3582269.3615599 · Cited by 381
Jiang, A. Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D. S., Casas, D. D. L., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., Lample, G., Saulnier, L., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06825 · Cited by 340
More human than human: measuring ChatGPT political bias
Motoki, F., Pinho Neto, V., & Rodrigues, V. (2024) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-023-01097-2 · Cited by 329
AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation
Wu, Q., Bansal, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhu, E., Jiang, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08155 · Cited by 193
Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents
Arechar, A. A., Allen, J., Berinsky, A. J., Cole, R., Epstein, Z., Garimella, K., Gully, A., Lu, J. G., Ross, R. M., Stagnaro, M. N., et al. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6 · Cited by 188
Wiki Surveys: Open and Quantifiable Social Data Collection
Salganik, M., & Levy, K. E. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123483 · Cited by 186
Post-Truth, Fake News and Democracy
Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429317347 · Cited by 150
Democracy by Design: Perspectives for Digitally Assisted, Participatory Upgrades of Society
Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Hänggli, R., Musso, A., Hausladen, C. I., Carissimo, C., Carpentras, D., Stockinger, E., Sánchez–Vaquerizo, J. A., Yang, J. C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102061 · Cited by 149
Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona
Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., et al. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22 · Cited by 118
Society: Build digital democracy
Helbing, D., & Pournaras, E. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/527033a · Cited by 97
Proof of witness presence: Blockchain consensus for augmented democracy in smart cities
Pournaras, E. (2020) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.06.015 · Cited by 88
Breindl, Y., & Francq, P. (2008) · International Journal of Electronic Democracy · doi:10.1504/ijed.2008.021276 · Cited by 86
Simulating Human Strategic Behavior: Comparing Single and Multi-agent LLMsPreprint
Sreedhar, K., & Chilton, L. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.08189 · Cited by 79
The Two-Sample Trimmed t for Unequal Population Variances
Yuen, K. K. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334299 · Cited by 77
LLM Voting: Human Choices and AI Collective Decision-Making
Yang, J. C., Dailisan, D. N., Korecki, M., Hausladen, C. I., & Helbing, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v7i1.31758 · Cited by 75
How do citizens perceive the use of Artificial Intelligence in public sector decisions?
Haesevoets, T., Verschuere, B., Van Severen, R., & Roets, A. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101906 · Cited by 74
vTaiwan: An Empirical Study of Open Consultation Process in TaiwanPreprint
Hsiao, Y. T., Lin, S.-Y., Tang, A., Narayanan, D., & Sarahe, C. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/xyhft · Cited by 61
Polis: Escalar de la deliberación mediante el mapeo de espacios de opinión de alta dimensión
Small, C. (2021) · Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi · doi:10.6035/recerca.5516 · Cited by 55
Wang, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, M., Liang, Y., & Hooi, B. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.8 · Cited by 48
Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates
Taubenfeld, A., Dover, Y., Reichart, R., & Goldstein, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.16 · Cited by 47
In Silico Sociology: Forecasting COVID-19 Polarization with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Kozlowski, A. C., Kwon, H., & Evans, J. A. (2024) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/7dfbc · Cited by 45
Ceron, T., Falk, N., Barić, A., Nikolaev, D., & Padó, S. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00710 · Cited by 43
BERT models for Brazilian Portuguese: Pretraining, evaluation and tokenization analysis
de Souza, F. C., Nogueira, R. F., & Lotufo, R. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110901 · Cited by 38
Wang, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, M., Liang, Y., & Hooi, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13206 · Cited by 13
Navarrete, C., Macedo, M., Colley, R., Zhang, J., Ferrada, N., de Mello, M. E. F., Lira, R., Bastos-Filho, C., Grandi, U., Lang, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01755-x · Cited by 12
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive NegotiationPreprint
Abdelnabi, S., Gomaa, A., Sivaprasad, S., Schönherr, L., & Fritz, M. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17234 · Cited by 11
Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases
Chen, G. H., Chen, S., Liu, Z., Jiang, F., & Wang, B. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.10669 · Cited by 9
de Tena, C. L., & de Viedma, D. G. (2023) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8427796 · Cited by 9
Homomorphic Encryption for Privacy-Friendly Augmented Democracy
Brabant, M., Pereira, O., & Méaux, P. (2022) · IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON) · doi:10.1109/melecon53508.2022.9843009 · Cited by 5
Digital Twins: On Algorithm-Based Political Participation
Marzá, D. G., & Calvo, P. (2024) · Philosophy and politics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53015-9_4 · Cited by 5
Generative Social ChoicePreprint
Fish, S., Gölz, P., Parkes, D. C., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.01291 · Cited by 3
Cited by
Why are double network hydrogels so tough?
Gong, J. P. (2010) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b924290b · Cited by 2,328
Man Tang, P., Koopman, J., McClean, S. T., Zhang, J. H., Li, C. H., De Cremer, D., Lu, Y., & Ng, C. T. S. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1516 · Cited by 370
Wieringa, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372833 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2019-12-22
- DOI
- 10.1098/rsta
- OpenAlex
- W4242282425
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 45
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
