Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we develop and release Llama 2, a collection of pretrained and fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) ranging in scale from 7 billion to 70 billion parameters. Our fine-tuned LLMs, called Llama 2-Chat, are optimized for dialogue use cases. Our models outperform open-source chat models on most benchmarks we tested, and based on our human evaluations for helpfulness and safety, may be a suitable substitute for closed-source models. We provide a detailed description of our approach to fine-tuning and safety improvements of Llama 2-Chat in order to enable the community to build on our work and contribute to the responsible development of LLMs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Llama 2's total training data was 1.8T tokens, while Llama 3 used 3.7T tokens for mathematical reasoning.
“Llama 2's total training data was 1.8T tokens (Touvron et al., 2023), while Llama 3 used 3.7T tokens for mathematical reasoning (Grattafiori et al., 2024).”
From LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning (2025) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Only the Llama 2 figure is attributed to Touvron et al. The Model Card (Appendix A.7, p. 77) says Llama 2 was pretrained on 2 trillion tokens, not 1.8 trillion; the Llama 3 figure is attributed to a different source and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe most widely used open-source LLMs can only support a few dozen back-and-forth messages or reason about a short document before exceeding their maximum input length.
“For example, the most widely used open-source LLMs can only support a few dozen back-and-forth messages or reason about a short document before exceeding their maximum input length (Touvron et al., 2023).”
From MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
The Architecture Changes section (p. 47) says Llama 2 has a 4,096-token context window and connects context length to chat histories and document understanding. It does not establish that the most widely used open-source LLMs are limited to a few dozen exchanges or a short document; the Human Evaluation section (p. 56) describes evaluation limits, not those models’ maximum input lengths. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCurrent knowledge injection methods often suffer from computational overhead, catastrophic forgetting, and overfitting.
“current knowledge injection methods often suffer from computational overhead [13, 10], catastrophic forgetting [63], and overfitting [64].”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Section 3.2.2, Reward Modeling (p. 11), reports that training the Llama 2 reward model longer could lead to overfitting. This supports an overfitting concern in one fine-tuning setting, but does not establish that knowledge-injection methods often suffer from it. The citation [64] is attached to overfitting, not to the sentence’s other two concerns. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLlama2 demonstrates that post-RLHF, the model consistently generated factual responses to prompts on factual information.
“Similarly, Llama2 [254] demonstrates that post-RLHF, the model consistently generated factual responses to prompts on factual information.”
From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [254]
Section 5.1 (pp. 32–33) reports that after RLHF, Llama 2-Chat tended to give the same response to factual prompts, even as sampling temperature increased. That supports consistency, but not the claim that those responses were consistently factually correct. Appendix A.3.7 (p. 58) cautions that its factual-question evaluation does not indicate the models’ hallucination rates. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredContemporary widely used LMs such as Llama 2 are trained on trillions of words.
“contemporary widely used LMs such as Llama 2 (Touvron et al., 2023) are trained on trillions of words (Figure 1).”
From Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corpora (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
The Model Card (p. 77) says Llama 2 was pretrained on 2 trillion tokens. That supports the scale of the claim, but the paper counts tokens, not words; it does not establish a training corpus of trillions of words. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Based on the GPT-3.5 results, it is unlikely that STOP would consistently work with any open-source LM at the time of writing.
“Based on the GPT-3.5 results, it is unlikely that STOP would consistently work with any open-source LM at the time of writing (Touvron et al., 2023; Jiang et al., 2023).”
From Self-Taught Optimizer (STOP): Recursively Self-Improving Code Generation (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Section 2.3 (p. 8) reports that Llama 2 70B trails GPT-3.5 substantially on a coding benchmark, supporting a performance gap relevant to the citing authors’ inference. The source does not evaluate STOP or establish that STOP would fail to work consistently with any open-source language model. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe limited context windows of modern LLMs severely handicap their performance in document analysis and multi-session chat.
“We evaluate our OS-inspired design in two domains where the limited context windows of modern LLMs severely handicaps their performance: document analysis, where MemGPT is able to analyze large documents that far exceed the underlying LLM's context window, and multi-session chat, where MemGPT can create conversational agents that remember, reflect, and evolve dynamically through long-term inter”
From MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Appendix A.2.1 (p. 47) says a longer context window helps models understand longer documents and retain longer chat histories, and reports improved performance on a long-context benchmark. It does not establish that limited windows severely handicap performance in document analysis or multi-session chat specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA limiting factor for in-context learning (ICL) in LLMs is the context window, restricting prior research to the few-shot ICL regime.
“A limiting factor for in-context learning (ICL) in LLMs is the context window, restricting prior research to the few-shot ICL regime.”
From Many-Shot In-Context Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
Section A.2.1 (p. 47) says that expanding Llama 2’s context window from 2,048 to 4,096 tokens lets it process more information, supporting the point that window size limits how much a model can take as input. It does not say that this limit restricted prior in-context-learning research to the few-shot regime; the few-shot discussion in Section 5.1 (p. 33) concerns tool-use examples, not that broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting foundation models for vision and language such as CLIP, SigLIP, and Llama 2 are capable of generalization stemming from Internet-scale pretraining.
“existing foundation models for vision and language such as CLIP [8], SigLIP [9], and Llama 2 [10] are capable of these types of generalization and more, stemming from the priors captured by their Internet-scale pretraining datasets.”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Section 2.1 (p. 5) says Llama 2 was pretrained on 2 trillion tokens from publicly available sources, and Section 2.3 (p. 8) reports its performance on few-shot benchmarks. This supports large-scale pretraining and some generalization for Llama 2, but the paper does not establish that the particular types of generalization intended by the citing sentence stem from priors captured in that data. Citation [10] concerns Llama 2, not CLIP or SigLIP. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecent LLMs have shown impressive capabilities in processing and generating text with remarkable accuracy, even outperforming human experts across diverse specialized domains including math, physics, history, law, medicine, and ethics.
“recent Large Language Models (LLMs) (Touvron et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023; Anil et al., 2023) have shown impressive capabilities in processing and generating text with remarkable accuracy, even outperforming human experts across diverse specialized domains including math, physics, history, law, medicine, and ethics.”
From ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
The Introduction (p. 3) describes LLMs as capable assistants that excel at complex reasoning requiring expert knowledge across a wide range of fields. Section 5.1 (p. 32) says LLM writing can surpass human annotators on certain tasks, but it does not establish that LLMs outperform human experts across the listed domains of math, physics, history, law, medicine, and ethics. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFinetuning and pretraining are computation-expensive and usually suffer from catastrophic forgetting and overfitting.
“However, finetuning and pretraining are computation-expensive [13, 10] and usually suffer from catastrophic forgetting [63] and overfitting [64].”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
In the development of Llama-2, the most factual sources within the pretraining data were up-sampled in order to reduce hallucinations.
“A representative example of such data-driven methods can be found in the development of Llama-2 [254], where the most factual sources within the pretraining data were up-sampled in order to reduce hallucinations.”
From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [254]
The winners of the challenge's various tracks made contributions that led to impressive improvements in evaluation over BabyLM baselines and Llama 2.
“The winners of the challenge's various tracks made contributions that led to impressive improvements in our evaluation over not just the BabyLM baselines, but also the massively pretrained Llama 2 model (Touvron et al., 2023).”
From Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corpora (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Instruction tuning does not require very much data.
“As instruction tuning does not require so much data (Zhou et al., 2023a;Touvron et al., 2023)”
From OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Models (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
LLaMA-2-Chat-7B undergoes RLHF.
“we note that LLaMA-2-Chat-7B also undergoes RLHF [60]”
From Laboratory-Scale AI: Open-Weight Models are Competitive with ChatGPT Even in Low-Resource Settings (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
LLMs are constrained by limited context windows, which hinders their utility in tasks like extended conversations and document analysis.
“Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized AI, but are constrained by limited context windows, hindering their utility in tasks like extended conversations and document analysis.”
From MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
State-of-the-art LLMs are generally implemented using the Transformer architecture, a multi-layer feedforward network with attention mechanism.
“State-of-the-art LLMs [66, 67, 7, 52] are generally implemented using the Transformer architecture, which is a multi-layer feedforward network equipped with attention mechanism [71].”
From Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Similar positive performance has been seen from other recent models, like Llama 2 (7B and 13B) chat variants.
“We have seen similar positive performance from other recent models, like Llama 2 (7B and 13B) chat variants (Touvron et al., 2023).”
From NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Rails (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Human feedback is commonly and widely used to finetune AI assistants.
“Human feedback is commonly utilized to finetune AI assistants.”
From AI Supported Degradation of the Self Concept: A Theoretical Framework Grounded in Established Cognitive and Computational Mechanisms (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Llama 2 is pre-trained on 2 trillion tokens of data using the autoregressive language modeling task.
“Llama 2 is pre-trained on 2 trillion tokens of data using the autoregressive language modeling task.”
From Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code-Change-Related Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Prior studies showed that within the same LLM family, larger models are associated with better performance.
“Prior studies showed that within the same LLM family, larger models are associated with better performance [59, 67, 73].”
From Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code-Change-Related Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Exploring many-shot ICL is now feasible, given the recent increase in context windows of publicly available LLMs by at least 100×.
“Exploring many-shot ICL is now feasible, given the recent increase in context windows of publicly available LLMs by at least 100 × : from only a few thousand tokens in GPT-3 [8] and Llama 2 [57] to 1M tokens in Gemini 1.5 Pro [16].”
From Many-Shot In-Context Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [57]
SELF-RAG outperforms retrieval-augmented ChatGPT on four tasks, Llama2-chat and Alpaca on all tasks.
“In particular, SELF-RAG outperforms retrieval-augmented ChatGPT on four tasks, Llama2-chat (Touvron et al., 2023) and Alpaca (Dubois et al., 2023) on all tasks.”
From CareerX: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Personalized AI-Driven Career Guidance (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
The authors' program with the 13b variant of llama2 is competitive with the 34b-based results reported by Touvron et al. (2023), even though the authors' program does not use human reasoning chains.
“Intriguingly, our program with the 13b variant of the model is competitive with their 34b-based results even though we don't use human reasoning chains in our program.”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Touvron et al. (2023) report 28.7% for llama2-13b, 42.2% for llama2-34b, and 56.8% for llama2-70b.
“The Llama2 authors (Touvron et al., 2023) presents 28.7% for llama2-13b , 42.2% for llama2-34b , and 56.8% for llama2-70b .”
From DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
A model whose weights are published can, in principle, be retrieved and rerun by others later, giving the runtime a snapshottable character more like conventional software environments and narrowing the shelf-life gap that closed-weight models create.
“A model whose weights are published33,34,35,36 can, in principle, be retrieved and rerun by others later, giving the runtime a snapshottable character more like that of conventional software environments and narrowing the shelf-life gap that closed-weight models create.”
From Designing reproducible large-language-model-assisted scientific analyses (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
Some game environments are procedurally generated and game states grow exponentially, making games more robust against evaluation dataset contamination.
“some game environments are procedurally generated and game states grow exponentially, making games more robust against evaluation dataset contamination as observed in recent works (Touvron et al., 2023).”
From SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
Section A.6 (pp. 75–76) discusses contamination in text-based evaluation datasets and its effect on benchmark scores. Searches for procedurally generated games, exponential growth in game states, and games' resistance to contamination found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGeneralization to other architectures should be verified.
“generalization to other architectures should be verified [Touvron et al., 2023, Achiam et al., 2023].”
From Accurate and Efficient Long-Term Memory for LLM Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Touvron et al., 2023
The architecture ablations in Appendix A.2.1 (pp. 47–48) compare attention variants within Llama 2, but do not say that generalization to other architectures should be verified. I searched for that recommendation and for discussion of transferring results across model architectures; the passages found do not address it. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredErrors in retrieving recent information may be intrinsic to current LLMs because pretraining procedures weight all text equally without emphasis on recent or high-quality information.
“Errors in retrieving recent information may be intrinsic to the current LLMs because the pretraining procedures weight all text in the training data equally, without specific emphasis on more recent or high-quality information.27”
From Performance of Large Language Models on Medical Oncology Examination Questions (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · see citing works
AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y., Liang, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., Saied, A., Chen, W., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06364 · Cited by 211 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In Table 24, we present fine-grained results from the English part of the AGI Eval (Zhong et al., 2023) benchmark.”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 102
- Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo. Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda , pages 197-236. University of Chicago Press, 2018.
- Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Andy Jones, Nicholas Joseph, Ben Mann, Nova DasSarma, et al. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861 , 2021b. · arXiv
- Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Andy Jones, Nicholas Joseph, Ben Mann, Nova DasSarma, Nelson Elhage, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Jackson Kernion, Kamal Ndousse, Catherine Olsson, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Sam McCandlish, and Chris Olah. A general language assistant as a laboratory for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00861 , 2021a. · arXiv
- YuntaoBai, Andy Jones, Kamal Ndousse, Amanda Askell, Anna Chen, Nova DasSarma, Dawn Drain, Stanislav Fort, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, et al. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.05862 , 2022a. · arXiv
- Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, et al. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073 , 2022b. · arXiv
- Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Margaret Mitchell. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages 610-623, 2021a.
- Emily M Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages 610-623, 2021b.
- A Stevie Bergman, Gavin Abercrombie, Shannon L Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau, and Verena Rieser. Guiding the release of safer e2e conversational ai through value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue , pages 39-52, 2022.
- Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Jianfeng Gao, Yejin Choi, et al. Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , pages 7432-7439, 2020.
- Su Lin Blodgett, Gilsinia Lopez, Alexandra Olteanu, Robert Sim, and Hanna Wallach. Stereotyping norwegian salmon: An inventory of pitfalls in fairness benchmark datasets. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 1004-1015, 2021.
- Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Chris Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 33, pages 1877-1901. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings. neurips.cc/paper\_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf .
- Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomás Mikolov. Enriching word vectors with subword information. CoRR , abs/1607.04606, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04606 . · arXiv
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Kaplan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, Alex Ray, Raul Puri, Gretchen Krueger, Michael Petrov, Heidy Khlaaf, Girish Sastry, Pamela Mishkin, Brooke Chan, Scott Gray, Nick Ryder, Mikhail Pavlov, Alethea Power, Lukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Bavarian, Clemens Winter, Philippe Tillet, Felipe Petroski Such, Dave Cummings, Matthias Plappert, Fotios Chantzis, Elizabeth Barnes, Ariel Herbert-Voss, William Hebgen Guss, Alex Nichol, Alex Paino, Nikolas Tezak, Jie Tang, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Shantanu Jain, William Saunders, Christopher Hesse, Andrew N. Carr, Jan Leike, Josh Achiam, Vedant Misra, Evan Morikawa, Alec Radford, Matthew Knight, Miles Brundage, Mira Murati, Katie Mayer, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Dario Amodei, Sam McCandlish, Ilya Sutskever, and Wojciech Zaremba. Evaluating large language models trained on code, 2021.
- Eunsol Choi, He He, Mohit Iyyer, Mark Yatskar, Wen-tau Yih, Yejin Choi, Percy Liang, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Quac: Question answering in context. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 2174-2184, 2018.
- Paul F Christiano, Jan Leike, Tom Brown, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg, and Dario Amodei. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30, 2017.
- Adam Roberts, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, and Jason Wei. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416 , 2022. · arXiv
- Elizabeth Clark, Tal August, Sofia Serrano, Nikita Haduong, Suchin Gururangan, and Noah A. Smith. All that's 'human' is not gold: Evaluating human evaluation of generated text. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 7282-7296, Online, August 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.565. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.565 . · DOI · Paper page
- Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina Toutanova. Boolq: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10044 , 2019. · arXiv
- Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457 , 2018. · arXiv
- Jiawen Deng, Hao Sun, Zhexin Zhang, Jiale Cheng, and Minlie Huang. Recent advances towards safe, responsible, and moral dialogue systems: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09270 , 2023. · arXiv
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, et al. Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 , 2021. · arXiv
- Yuntian Deng, Anton Bakhtin, Myle Ott, Arthur Szlam, and Marc'Aurelio Ranzato. Residual energy-based models for text generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019.
- Emily Dinan, Gavin Abercrombie, A Stevie Bergman, Shannon Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Y-Lan Boureau, and Verena Rieser. Anticipating safety issues in e2e conversational ai: Framework and tooling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03451 , 2021. · arXiv
- Jwala Dhamala, Tony Sun, Varun Kumar, Satyapriya Krishna, Yada Pruksachatkun, Kai-Wei Chang, and Rahul Gupta. BOLD: Dataset and metrics for measuring biases in open-ended language generation. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages 862-872, 2021.
- Jesse Dodge, Maarten Sap, Ana Marasović, William Agnew, Gabriel Ilharco, Dirk Groeneveld, Margaret Mitchell, and Matt Gardner. Documenting large webtext corpora: A case study on the colossal clean crawled corpus. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 1286-1305, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, November 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.98. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main. 98 . · DOI · Paper page
- Nan Du, Yanping Huang, Andrew M Dai, Simon Tong, Dmitry Lepikhin, Yuanzhong Xu, Maxim Krikun, Yanqi Zhou, Adams Wei Yu, Orhan Firat, Barret Zoph, Liam Fedus, Maarten P Bosma, Zongwei Zhou, Tao Wang, Emma Wang, Kellie Webster, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Kathleen Meier-Hellstern, Toju Duke, Lucas Dixon, Kun Zhang, Quoc Le, Yonghui Wu, Zhifeng Chen, and Claire Cui. GLaM: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts. In Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvari, Gang Niu, and Sivan Sabato, editors, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 5547-5569. PMLR, 17-23 Jul 2022. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/du22c.html .
- Jesse Dodge, Taylor Prewitt, Remi Tachet Des Combes, Erika Odmark, Roy Schwartz, Emma Strubell, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Noah A Smith, Nicole DeCario, and Will Buchanan. Measuring the carbon intensity of ai in cloud instances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05229 , 2022. · arXiv
- Kawin Ethayarajh, Yejin Choi, and Swabha Swayamdipta. Understanding dataset difficulty with V -usable information. In Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvari, Gang Niu, and Sivan Sabato, editors, Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 5988-6008. PMLR, 17-23 Jul 2022.
- Deep Ganguli, Liane Lovitt, Jackson Kernion, Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Ben Mann, Ethan Perez, Nicholas Schiefer, Kamal Ndousse, et al. Red teaming language models to reduce harms: Methods, scaling behaviors, and lessons learned. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07858 , 2022. · arXiv
- Prakhar Ganesh, Hongyan Chang, Martin Strobel, and Reza Shokri. On the impact of machine learning randomness on group fairness. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency , pages 1789-1800, 2023.
- Deep Ganguli, Amanda Askell, Nicholas Schiefer, Thomas Liao, Kamil˙ e Lukoši¯ ut˙ e, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Catherine Olsson, Danny Hernandez, et al. The capacity for moral self-correction in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07459 , 2023. · arXiv
- Sebastian Gehrmann, Elizabeth Clark, and Thibault Sellam. Repairing the cracked foundation: A survey of obstacles in evaluation practices for generated text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 77:103-166, 2023.
- Fabrizio Gilardi, Meysam Alizadeh, and Maël Kubli. Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15056 , 2023. · arXiv
- Udit Gupta, Mariam Elgamal, Gage Hills, Gu-Yeon Wei, Hsien-Hsin S Lee, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu. Act: designing sustainable computer systems with an architectural carbon modeling tool. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture , pages 784-799, 2022a.
- Arnav Gudibande, Eric Wallace, Charlie Snell, Xinyang Geng, Hao Liu, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey Levine, and Dawn Song. The false promise of imitating proprietary llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15717 , 2023. · arXiv
- Udit Gupta, Young Guen Kim, Sylvia Lee, Jordan Tse, Hsien-Hsin Sean Lee, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu. Chasing carbon: The elusive environmental footprint of computing. IEEE Micro , 2022b.
- Kilem Li Gwet. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 61(1):29-48, 2008.
- Thomas Hartvigsen, Saadia Gabriel, Hamid Palangi, Maarten Sap, Dipankar Ray, and Ece Kamar. Toxigen: A large-scale machine-generated dataset for adversarial and implicit hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages 3309-3326, 2022.
- Pengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. Deberta: Decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03654 , 2020. · arXiv
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Xiaodong Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300 , 2020. · arXiv
- Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556 , 2022. · arXiv
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, Steven Basart, Eric Tang, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03874 , 2021. · arXiv
- Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id= rygGQyrFvH .
- Saghar Hosseini, Hamid Palangi, and Ahmed Hassan Awadallah. An empirical study of metrics to measure representational harms in pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.09211 , 2023. · arXiv
- Or Honovich, Thomas Scialom, Omer Levy, and Timo Schick. Unnatural instructions: Tuning language models with (almost) no human labor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09689 , 2022. · arXiv
- Fan Huang, Haewoon Kwak, and Jisun An. Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07736 , 2023. · arXiv
- Mandar Joshi, Eunsol Choi, Daniel S Weld, and Luke Zettlemoyer. Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551 , 2017. · arXiv
- Clayton Hutto and Eric Gilbert. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media , volume 8, pages 216-225, 2014.
- Andreas Köpf, Yannic Kilcher, Dimitri von Rütte, Sotiris Anagnostidis, Zhi-Rui Tam, Keith Stevens, Abdullah Barhoum, Nguyen Minh Duc, Oliver Stanley, Richárd Nagyfi, et al. Openassistant conversationsdemocratizing large language model alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07327 , 2023. · arXiv
- James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , 114(13):3521-3526, 2017.
- Tomasz Korbak, Kejian Shi, Angelica Chen, Rasika Bhalerao, Christopher L Buckley, Jason Phang, Samuel R Bowman, and Ethan Perez. Pretraining language models with human preferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08582 , 2023. · arXiv
- Sachin Kumar, Vidhisha Balachandran, Lucille Njoo, Antonios Anastasopoulos, and Yulia Tsvetkov. Language generation models can cause harm: So what can we do about it? an actionable survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07700 , 2022. · arXiv
- Tom Kwiatkowski, Jennimaria Palomaki, Olivia Redfield, Michael Collins, Ankur Parikh, Chris Alberti, Danielle Epstein, Illia Polosukhin, Jacob Devlin, Kenton Lee, et al. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 7:453-466, 2019.
- Katherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang, Douglas Eck, Chris Callison-Burch, and Nicholas Carlini. Deduplicating training data makes language models better. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022.
- Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , 2019. · arXiv
- Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. Truthfulqa: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07958 , 2021. · arXiv
- Shayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson, Hyung Won Chung, Yi Tay, Denny Zhou, Quoc V Le, Barret Zoph, Jason Wei, et al. The flan collection: Designing data and methods for effective instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13688 , 2023. · arXiv
- Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, et al. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17651 , 2023. · arXiv
- Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 , 2017. · arXiv
- Grégoire Mialon, Roberto Dessì, Maria Lomeli, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Ram Pasunuru, Roberta Raileanu, Baptiste Rozière, Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Asli Celikyilmaz, et al. Augmented language models: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07842 , 2023. · arXiv
- Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. Model cards for model reporting. CoRR , abs/1810.03993, 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03993 . · arXiv
- Todor Mihaylov, Peter Clark, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? a new dataset for open book question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02789 , 2018. · arXiv
- Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Lonbrown Ouyanbrown, Christina Kim, Christopher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe, Tyna Eloundou, Gretchen Krueger, Kevin Button, Matthew Knight, Benjamin Chess, and John Schulman. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback. In arXiv , 2021.
- Cuong V. Nguyen, Alessandro Achille, Michael Lam, Tal Hassner, Vijay Mahadevan, and Stefano Soatto. Toward understanding catastrophic forgetting in continual learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.01091 , 2019. · arXiv
- OpenAI. GPT-4 technical report. CoRR , abs/2303.08774, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774 . · DOI · Paper page
- Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:27730-27744, 2022.
- David Patterson, Joseph Gonzalez, Quoc Le, Chen Liang, Lluis-Miquel Munguia, Daniel Rothchild, David So, Maud Texier, and Jeff Dean. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350 , 2021. · arXiv
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Robin Jia, and Percy Liang. Know what you don't know: Unanswerable questions for squad. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822 , 2018. · arXiv
- Vinay Venkatesh Ramasesh, Aitor Lewkowycz, and Ethan Dyer. Effect of scale on catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021.
- Stephen Roller, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston, Antoine Bordes, Emily Dinan, Angela Fan, David Gunning, Da Ju, Margaret Li, Spencer Poff, et al. Open-domain conversational agents: Current progress, open problems, and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12442 , 2020. · arXiv
- Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi. Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale. Communications of the ACM , 64(9):99-106, 2021.
- Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan LeBras, and Yejin Choi. Socialiqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09728 , 2019. · arXiv
- Teven Le Scao, Angela Fan, Christopher Akiki, Ellie Pavlick, Suzana Ilić, Daniel Hesslow, Roman Castagné, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, François Yvon, Matthias Gallé, et al. Bloom: A 176b-parameter open-access multilingual language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05100 , 2022. · arXiv
- Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu, Maria Lomeli, Luke Zettlemoyer, Nicola Cancedda, and Thomas Scialom. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04761 , 2023. · arXiv
- John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , 2017. · arXiv
- Thomas Scialom, Paul-Alexis Dray, Sylvain Lamprier, Benjamin Piwowarski, and Jacopo Staiano. Discriminative adversarial search for abstractive summarization. In Hal Daumé III and Aarti Singh, editors, Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 8555-8564. PMLR, 13-18 Jul 2020a. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/ scialom20a.html .
- Thomas Scialom, Paul-Alexis Dray, Sylvain Lamprier, Benjamin Piwowarski, and Jacopo Staiano. Coldgans: Taming language gans with cautious sampling strategies. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:18978-18989, 2020b.
- Uri Shaham, Elad Segal, Maor Ivgi, Avia Efrat, Ori Yoran, Adi Haviv, Ankit Gupta, Wenhan Xiong, Mor Geva, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. SCROLLS: Standardized CompaRison over long language sequences. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 12007-12021, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.823 .
- Eric Michael Smith and Adina Williams. Hi, my name is martha: Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03300 , 2021. · arXiv
- Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, and Ross Anderson. The curse of recursion: Training on generated data makes models forget. arXiv preprint arxiv:2305.17493 , 2023. · arXiv
- Eric Michael Smith, Melissa Hall, Melanie Kambadur, Eleonora Presani, and Adina Williams. 'i'm sorry to hear that': Finding new biases in language models with a holistic descriptor dataset. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 9180-9211, 2022.
- Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, and Paul Christiano. Learning to summarize from human feedback. In NeurIPS , 2020.
- Irene Solaiman, Zeerak Talat, William Agnew, Lama Ahmad, Dylan Baker, Su Lin Blodgett, Hal Daumé III, Jesse Dodge, Ellie Evans, Sara Hooker, et al. Evaluating the social impact of generative ai systems in systems and society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05949 , 2023. · arXiv
- Mirac Suzgun, Nathan Scales, Nathanael Schärli, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yi Tay, Hyung Won Chung, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Quoc V Le, Ed H Chi, Denny Zhou, et al. Challenging big-bench tasks and whether chain-ofthought can solve them. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09261 , 2022. · arXiv
- Yarden Tal, Inbal Magar, and Roy Schwartz. Fewer errors, but more stereotypes? the effect of model size on gender bias. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) , pages 112-120, Seattle, Washington, July 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.13. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.gebnlp-1.13 . · DOI
- AlonTalmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. Commonsenseqa: A question answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00937 , 2018. · arXiv
- Ross Taylor, Marcin Kardas, Guillem Cucurull, Thomas Scialom, Anthony Hartshorn, Elvis Saravia, Andrew Poulton, Viktor Kerkez, and Robert Stojnic. Galactica: A large language model for science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09085 , 2022. · arXiv
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aur'elien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, and Guillaume Lample. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , 2023. · arXiv
- Oriol Vinyals, Igor Babuschkin, Wojciech M Czarnecki, Michaël Mathieu, Andrew Dudzik, Junyoung Chung, David H Choi, Richard Powell, Timo Ewalds, Petko Georgiev, et al. Grandmaster level in starcraft ii using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Nature , 575(7782):350-354, 2019.
- Yizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu, Noah A Smith, Daniel Khashabi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Self-instruct: Aligning language model with self generated instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10560 , 2022. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M Dai, and Quoc V Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021.
- Michael Webb. The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Available at SSRN 3482150 , 2019.
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, Andrew M. Dai, and Quoc V Le. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022a. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=gEZrGCozdqR .
- Laura Weidinger, John Mellor, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Jonathan Uesato, Po-Sen Huang, Myra Cheng, Mia Glaese, Borja Balle, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, et al. Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04359 , 2021. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:24824-24837, 2022b.
- Carole-Jean Wu, Ramya Raghavendra, Udit Gupta, Bilge Acun, Newsha Ardalani, Kiwan Maeng, Gloria Chang, Fiona Aga, Jinshi Huang, Charles Bai, et al. Sustainable ai: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems , 4:795-813, 2022.
- Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi. Hellaswag: Can a machine really finish your sentence? arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07830 , 2019a. · arXiv
- Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Hannah Rashkin, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, Franziska Roesner, and Yejin Choi. Defending against neural fake news. Advances in neural information processing systems , 32, 2019b.
- Susan Zhang, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal, Mikel Artetxe, Moya Chen, Shuohui Chen, Christopher Dewan, Mona Diab, Xian Li, Xi Victoria Lin, et al. Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068 , 2022. · arXiv
- Chunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srini Iyer, Jiao Sun, Yuning Mao, Xuezhe Ma, Avia Efrat, Ping Yu, Lili Yu, Susan Zhang, Gargi Ghosh, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Omer Levy. Lima: Less is more for alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11206 , 2023. · arXiv
- Yongchao Zhou, Andrei Ioan Muresanu, Ziwen Han, Keiran Paster, Silviu Pitis, Harris Chan, and Jimmy Ba. Large language models are human-level prompt engineers. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022.
- Terry Yue Zhuo, Yujin Huang, Chunyang Chen, and Zhenchang Xing. Exploring ai ethics of chatgpt: A diagnostic analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12867 , 2023. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3571730 · Cited by 5,025 · see citing works
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
A survey on large language model based autonomous agents
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
A Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Dong, Z., Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Min, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3 · Cited by 2,093 · see citing works
Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning
Liu, H., Li, C., Li, Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02484 · Cited by 1,748 · see citing works
Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts
Liu, N. F., Lin, K., Hewitt, J., Paranjape, A., Bevilacqua, M., Petroni, F., & Liang, P. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00638 · Cited by 1,612 · see citing works
A survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Yao, Y., Duan, J., Xu, K., Cai, Y., Sun, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · High-Confidence Computing · doi:10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100211 · Cited by 1,083 · see citing works
Self-citationDetecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy
Farquhar, S., Kossen, J., Kuhn, L., & Gal, Y. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07421-0 · Cited by 934 · see citing works
“Our results for TriviaQA, SQuAD, BioASQ, NQ-Open and SVAMP are all evaluated context-free and involve sentence-length answers (96 ± 70 characters, mean ± s.d.) and use LLaMA 2 Chat (7B, 13B and 70B parameters) 38 , Falcon Instruct (7B and 40B) 39 and Mistral Instruct (7B) 40 .”
Adapted large language models can outperform medical experts in clinical text summarization
Van Veen, D., Van Uden, C., Blankemeier, L., Delbrouck, J.-B., Aali, A., Bluethgen, C., Pareek, A., Polacin, M., Reis, E. P., Seehofnerová, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02855-5 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
“Given the model’s lower error rate in each category, this suggests that incorporating LLMs could actually reduce fabricated information in clinical practice.”
A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Fan, W., Ding, Y., Ning, L., Wang, S., Li, H., Yin, D., Chua, T.-S., & Li, Q. (2024) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671470 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
“Large language models (LLMs) such as the GPT series [Brown et al. , 2020, OpenAI, 2023] and the LLama series [Touvron et al. , 2023], along with other models like Gemini [Google, 2023], have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing, demonstrating supe-∗ rior performance on various…”
BackgroundIntern VL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks
Chen, Z., Wu, J., Wang, W., Su, W., Chen, G., Xing, S., Zhong, M., Zhang, Q., Zhu, X., Lu, L., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02283 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making
Hager, P., Jungmann, F., Holland, R., Bhagat, K., Hubrecht, I., Knauer, M., Vielhauer, J., Makowski, M., Braren, R., Kaissis, G., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
“Future models could possibly soon reach or even outperform clinicians in residency and thus provide a low-cost, interactive second opinion to consult, as is already the case for AI models in other areas such as mammography screening 70 .”
A Survey on In-context Learning
Dong, Q., Li, L., Dai, D., Zheng, C., Ma, J., Li, R., Xia, H., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Chang, B., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
Rozière, B., Gehring, J., Gloeckle, F., Sootla, S., Gat, I., Tan, X. E., Adi, Y., Liu, J., Sauvestre, R., Remez, T., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.12950 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Self-citationGraph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models
Besta, M., Blach, N., Kubicek, A., Gerstenberger, R., Podstawski, M., Gianinazzi, L., Gajda, J., Lehmann, T., Niewiadomski, H., Nyczyk, P., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29720 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Role play with large language models
Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
A multimodal generative AI copilot for human pathology
Lu, M. Y., Chen, B., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, R. J., Zhao, M., Chow, A. K., Ikemura, K., Kim, A., Pouli, D., Patel, A., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07618-3 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI
Yue, X., Ni, Y., Zheng, T., Zhang, K., Liu, R., Zhang, G., Stevens, S., Jiang, D., Ren, W., Sun, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00913 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Tam, T. Y. C., Sivarajkumar, S., Kapoor, S., Stolyar, A. V., Polanska, K., McCarthy, K. R., Osterhoudt, H., Wu, X., Visweswaran, S., Fu, S., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01258-7 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Polak, M. P., & Morgan, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45914-8 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4
Kalyan, K. S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100048 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Bai, J., Bai, S., Chu, Y., Cui, Z., Dang, K., Deng, X., Fan, Y., Ge, W., Han, Y., Huang, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.16609 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Self-citationA Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving
Cui, C., Ma, Y., Cao, X., Ye, W., Zhou, Y., Liang, K., Chen, J., Lu, J., Yang, Z., Liao, K.-D., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw60836.2024.00106 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
The Potential of Generative AI for Personalized Persuasion at Scale
Matz, S., Teeny, J., Vaid, S. S., Peters, H., Harari, G. M., & Cerf, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rn97c · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Towards Accurate Differential Diagnosis with Large Language Models
McDuff, D., Schaekermann, M., Tu, T., Palepu, A., Wang, A., Garrison, J., Singhal, K., Sharma, Y., Azizi, S., Kulkarni, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00164 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Towards accurate differential diagnosis with large language models
McDuff, D., Schaekermann, M., Tu, T., Palepu, A., Wang, A., Garrison, J., Singhal, K., Sharma, Y., Azizi, S., Kulkarni, K., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08869-4 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Improving large language models for clinical named entity recognition via prompt engineering
Hu, Y., Chen, Q., Du, J., Peng, X., Keloth, V. K., Zuo, X., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., Jiang, X., Lu, Z., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad259 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
PMC-LLaMA: toward building open-source language models for medicine
Wu, C., Lin, W., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Xie, W., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae045 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationCan large language models reason about medical questions?
Liévin, V., Hother, C. E., Motzfeldt, A. G., & Winther, O. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100943 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
“33,37 Throughoutthe development of this research, significant progress happened in the open-source world (Llama 2 38 ), and recently, there has been an investigation on both generalist and fine-tuned open-source LLMs applied to medical benchmarks.”
BackgroundDeepSeek-AI, Liu, A., Feng, B., Xue, B., Wang, B., Wu, B., Lu, C., Zhao, C., Deng, C., Zhang, C., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.19437 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Self-citationHaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models
Li, J., Cheng, X., Zhao, X., Nie, J.-Y., & Wen, J.-R. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.397 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Large language models for generative information extraction: a survey
Xu, D., Chen, W., Peng, W., Zhang, C., Xu, T., Zhao, X., Wu, X., Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, E. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40555-y · Cited by 326 · see citing works
“In IE, the extraction targets exhibit intricate structures where entities are presented as span structures (string structures) and relationships are represented as triple structures [4].”
Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Dahl, M., Magesh, V., Suzgun, M., & Ho, D. E. (2024) · Journal of Legal Analysis · doi:10.1093/jla/laae003 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Mental-LLM: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text Data
Xu, X., Yao, B., Dong, Y., Gabriel, S., Yu, H., Hendler, J., Ghassemi, M., Dey, A. K., & Wang, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3643540 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
The potential of generative AI for personalized persuasion at scale
Matz, S. C., Teeny, J. D., Vaid, S. S., Peters, H., Harari, G. M., & Cerf, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53755-0 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Models
Zhu, X., Li, J., Liu, Y., Ma, C., & Wang, W. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00704 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-collaboration code generation via ChatGPT
Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Jin, Z., & Li, G. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3672459 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
“In this section, we further analyze the errors generated by self-collaboration and the cost of self-collaboration compared to other prompting approaches.”
InfluentialA review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry
Ramos, M. C., Collison, C. J., & White, A. D. (2025) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d4sc03921a · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Retrieval augmented generation for large language models in healthcare: A systematic review
Amugongo, L. M., Mascheroni, P., Brooks, S., Doering, S., & Seidel, J. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000877 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for On-Device LLM Compression and Acceleration
Lin, J., Tang, J., Tang, H., Yang, S., Xiao, G., & Han, S. (2025) · GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications · doi:10.1145/3714983.3714987 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Cascella, M., Semeraro, F., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., Piazza, O., & Bignami, E. (2024) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-024-02045-3 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review
Zhang, J., Bu, H., Wen, H., Liu, Y., Fei, H., Xi, R., Li, L., Yang, Y., Zhu, H., & Meng, D. (2025) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-025-00361-w · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Chen, Q., Hu, Y., Peng, X., Xie, Q., Jin, Q., Gilson, A., Singer, M. B., Ai, X., Lai, P.-T., Wang, Z., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56989-2 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“Nori et al. further found that general-domain LLMs with advanced prompt engineering can achieve the highest accuracy in medical question answering without fi ne-tuning 27 .”
CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agents
Hong, W., Wang, W., Lv, Q., Xu, J., Yu, W., Ji, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Ding, M., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01354 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
An evaluation framework for clinical use of large language models in patient interaction tasks
Johri, S., Jeong, J., Tran, B. A., Schlessinger, D. I., Wongvibulsin, S., Barnes, L. A., Zhou, H.-Y., Cai, Z. R., Van Allen, E. M., Kim, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03328-5 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Larger and more instructable language models become less reliable
Zhou, L., Schellaert, W., Martínez-Plumed, F., Moros-Daval, Y., Ferri, C., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07930-y · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781003459026 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations
Gao, T., Yen, H., Yu, J., & Chen, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.398 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Sentiment Analysis in the Age of Generative AI
Krugmann, J. O., & Hartmann, J. (2024) · Customer Needs and Solutions · doi:10.1007/s40547-024-00143-4 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
“Meta has specifically focused on selecting and weighting its training data based on the truthfulness, toxicity, and bias inherent in the language when training Llama 2 [63].”
InfluentialTakita, H., Kabata, D., Walston, S. L., Tatekawa, H., Saito, K., Tsujimoto, Y., Miki, Y., & Ueda, D. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01543-z · Cited by 203 · see citing works
MovieChat: From Dense Token to Sparse Memory for Long Video Understanding
Song, E., Chai, W., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, F., Chi, H., Guo, X., Ye, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.16449 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationMovieChat: From Dense Token to Sparse Memory for Long Video Understanding
Song, E., Chai, W., Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Wu, F., Chi, H., Guo, X., Ye, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01725 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationEyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs
Tong, S., Liu, Z., Zhai, Y., Ma, Y., LeCun, Y., & Xie, S. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00914 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models
Xu, Z., Jain, S., & Kankanhalli, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.11817 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?
Sadasivan, V. S., Kumar, A., Balasubramanian, S., Wang, W., & Feizi, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11156 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
From local to global: a graph rag approach to query-focused summarization
Edge, D., Trinh, H., Cheng, N., Bradley, J., Chao, A., Mody, A., Truitt, S., Metropolitansky, D., Ness, R. O., & Larson, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.16130 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Legalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
Guha, N., Nyarko, J., Ho, D. E., Ré, C., Chilton, A., Narayana, A., Chohlas-Wood, A., Peters, A., Waldon, B., Rockmore, D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4583531 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models
Gunjal, A., Yin, J., & Bas, E. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29771 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model
Hao, S., Gu, Y., Ma, H., Hong, J., Wang, Z., Wang, D., & Hu, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.507 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Effective test generation using pre-trained Large Language Models and mutation testing
Dakhel, A. M., Nikanjam, A., Majdinasab, V., Khomh, F., & Desmarais, M. C. (2024) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107468 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Biomedical knowledge graph-optimized prompt generation for large language models
Soman, K., Rose, P. W., Morris, J. H., Akbas, R. E., Smith, B., Peetoom, B., Villouta-Reyes, C., Cerono, G., Shi, Y., Rizk-Jackson, A., et al. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae560 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Large language models for reticular chemistry
Zheng, Z., Rampal, N., Inizan, T. J., Borgs, C., Chayes, J. T., & Yaghi, O. M. (2025) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-025-00772-8 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., Duperrouzel, D., Was, H., Korbak, J., Cheng, M., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Brain, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13548 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“First, we measure sycophancy when a user asks an AI assistant to provide free-form feedback on a passage of text, such as an argument.”
Applications of natural language processing and large language models in materials discovery
Jiang, X., Wang, W., Tian, S., Wang, H., Lookman, T., & Su, Y. (2025) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-025-01554-0 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Rails
Rebedea, T., Dinu, R., Sreedhar, M. N., Parisien, C., & Cohen, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-demo.40 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layers
Wang, H., Ma, S., Dong, L., Huang, S., Zhang, D., & Wei, F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3386927 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents
Zhan, Q., Liang, Z., Ying, Z., & Kang, D. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.624 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Ni, B., & Buehler, M. J. (2024) · Extreme Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.eml.2024.102131 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
On the creativity of large language models
Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02127-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
LLM in a flash: Efficient Large Language Model Inference with Limited Memory
Alizadeh, K., Mirzadeh, S. I., Belenko, D., Khatamifard, S., Cho, M., Del Mundo, C. C., Rastegari, M., & Farajtabar, M. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.678 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Clinical Text Summarization: Adapting Large Language Models Can Outperform Human Experts
Veen, D. V., Uden, C. V., Blankemeier, L., Delbrouck, J.-B., Aali, A., Bluethgen, C., Pareek, A., Polacin, M., Reis, E. P., Seehofnerova, A., et al. (2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3483777/v1 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
“Descendants of this original model have taken additional fine-tuning approaches, such as fine-tuning via instruction following (Alpaca [66]), medical Q&A data (Med-Alpaca [30]), user-shared conversations (Vicuna [10]), and reinforcement learning from human feedback (Llama-2 [70]).”
BackgroundMethodThe Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPT
Rutinowski, J., Franke, S., Endendyk, J., Dormuth, I., Roidl, M., & Pauly, M. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/7115633 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Asai, A., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Sil, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.11511 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“R AG significantly less frequently generates answers that are not included in the provided evidence; in particular, in Alpaca 30B, 20% of the correct predictions are not included in the provided passages, followed by Llama2-chat 13B (18”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationDeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
Shao, Z., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Xu, R., Song, J., Bi, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, M., Li, Y. K., Wu, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.03300 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Evaluation of large language models for discovery of gene set function
Hu, M., Alkhairy, S., Lee, I., Pillich, R. T., Fong, D., Smith, K., Bachelder, R., Ideker, T., & Pratt, D. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02525-x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
DeepSeek-AI, :, Bi, X., Chen, D., Chen, G., Chen, S., Dai, D., Deng, C., Ding, H., Dong, K., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.02954 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationDRG-LLaMA : tuning LLaMA model to predict diagnosis-related group for hospitalized patients
Wang, H., Gao, C., Dantona, C., Hull, B., & Sun, J. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00989-3 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, S., Gao, M., Sasse, K., Hartvigsen, T., Anthony, B., Fan, L., Aerts, H., Gallifant, J., & Bitterman, D. S. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02008-z · Cited by 112 · see citing works
McCoy, R. T., Yao, S., Friedman, D., Hardy, M. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322420121 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces
Yang, J., Yang, S., Gupta, A. W., Han, R., Fei-Fei, L., & Xie, S. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00994 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Large Language Models in Mental Health Care: A Scoping Review
Hua, Y., Liu, F., Yang, K., Li, Z., Na, H., Sheu, Y.-H., Zhou, P., Moran, L. V., Ananiadou, S., Clifton, D. A., et al. (2025) · Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40501-025-00363-y · Cited by 92 · see citing works
LL3DA: Visual Interactive Instruction Tuning for Omni-3D Understanding, Reasoning, and Planning
Chen, S., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Li, M., Yu, G., Fei, H., Zhu, H., Fan, J., & Chen, T. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02496 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: State-of-the-Art
Motlagh, F. N., Hajizadeh, M., Majd, M., Najafi, P., Cheng, F., & Meinel, C. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.00891 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“Llama, a set of decoder-only models aimed at minimizing the amount of activations in the backward step [59, 84].”
BackgroundMethodOpen Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Casper, S., Davies, X., Shi, C., Gilbert, T. K., Scheurer, J., Rando, J., Freedman, R., Korbak, T., Lindner, D., Freire, P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15217 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“…have revealed sensitive private information [Li et al., 2023a, El-Mhamdi et al., 2022], hallucinated untrue content [Ji et al., 2023, OpenAI, 2023, Zhang et al., 2023], spread biases that favor specific political ideologies [Santurkar et al., 2023, Perez et al., 2022b], exhibited sycophantic…”
BackgroundGenerative language models exhibit social identity biases
Hu, T., Kyrychenko, Y., Rathje, S., Collier, N., van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00741-1 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
RCAgent: Cloud Root Cause Analysis by Autonomous Agents with Tool-Augmented Large Language Models
Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhong, A., Wang, J., Yin, F., Fan, L., Wu, L., & Wen, Q. (2024) · Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3627673.3680016 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Theembedding modelweuseis GTE-LARGE [24],foritsslightly”
Self-citationTriguero, I., Molina, D., Poyatos, J., Del Ser, J., & Herrera, F. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102135 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
Caffagni, D., Cocchi, F., Barsellotti, L., Moratelli, N., Sarto, S., Baraldi, L., Baraldi, L., Cornia, M., & Cucchiara, R. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.807 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters
Widder, D. G., Whittaker, M., & West, S. M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08141-1 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questions
Pezeshkpour, P., & Hruschka, E. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.130 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Zheng, M., Pei, J., Logeswaran, L., Lee, M., & Jurgens, D. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.888 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Performance of Large Language Models on Medical Oncology Examination Questions
Longwell, J. B., Hirsch, I., Binder, F., Gonzalez Conchas, G. A., Mau, D., Jang, R., Krishnan, R. G., & Grant, R. C. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17641 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents
Maharana, A., Lee, D.-H., Tulyakov, S., Bansal, M., Barbieri, F., & Fang, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.747 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Buehler, M. J. (2024) · ACS Engineering Au · doi:10.1021/acsengineeringau.3c00058 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
Klesel, M., & Wittmann, H. F. (2025) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-025-00945-3 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Developing and evaluating large language model–generated emergency medicine handoff notes
Hartman, V., Zhang, X., Poddar, R., McCarty, M., Fortenko, A., Sholle, E., Sharma, R., Campion, T., & Steel, P. A. D. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48723 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Chaudhari, S., Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., Deshpande, A., & Castro da Silva, B. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3743127 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentation
Vu, T., Iyyer, M., Wang, X., Constant, N., Wei, J., Wei, J., Tar, C., Sung, Y.-H., Zhou, D., Le, Q., et al. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.813 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K., Albert, P., Almahairi, A., Babaei, Y., Bashlykov, N., Batra, S., Bhargava, P., Bhosale, S., Bikel, D., Blecher, L., Ferrer, C. C., Chen, M., Cucurull, G., Esiobu, D., Fernandes, J., Fu, J., Fu, W., Fuller, B., Gao, C., Goswami, V., Goyal, N., Hartshorn, A., Hosseini, S., Hou, R., Inan, H., Kardas, M., Kerkez, V., Khabsa, M., Kloumann, I., Korenev, A., Koura, P. S., Lachaux, M.-A., Lavril, T., Lee, J., Liskovich, D., Lu, Y., Mao, Y., Martinet, X., Mihaylov, T., Mishra, P., Molybog, I., Nie, Y., Poulton, A., Reizenstein, J., Rungta, R., Saladi, K., Schelten, A., Silva, R., Smith, E. M., Subramanian, R., Tan, X. E., Tang, B., Taylor, R., Williams, A., Kuan, J. X., Xu, P., Yan, Z., Zarov, I., Zhang, Y., Fan, A., Kambadur, M., Narang, S., Rodriguez, A., Stojnic, R., Edunov, S., & Scialom, T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2307.09288
- OpenAlex
- W4384918448
- Cited by
- 2,604
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 173 · 2025: 808 · 2024: 1373 · 2023: 248 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- large language models, clinical decision support, offline deployment, context retention, allergy documentation, discrepancy detection, treatment escalation, open-weight language models, resource-constrained environments, synthetic patient data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
