Cited by 75Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structurePaleopathology and ancient diseases

Analysis of ancient DNA from a prehistoric Amerindian cemetery

Open access
Stone, Anne C., Stoneking, Mark·1999·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The Norris Farms No. 36 cemetery in central Illinois has been the subject of considerable archaeological and genetic research. Both mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA have been examined in this 700–year–old population. DNA preservation at the site was good, with about 70% of the samples producing mtDNA results and approximately 15% yielding nuclear DNA data. All four of the major Amerindian mtDNA haplogroups were found, in addition to a fifth haplogroup. Sequences of the first hypervariable region of the mtDNA control region revealed a high level of diversity in the Norris Farms population and confirmed that the fifth haplogroup associates with Mongolian sequences and hence is probably authentic. Other than a possible reduction in the number of rare mtDNA lineages in many populations, it does not appear as if European contact significantly altered patterns of Amerindian mtDNA variation, despite the large decrease in population size that occurred. For nuclear DNA analysis, a novel method for DNA–based sex identification that uses nucleotide differences between the X and Y copies of the amelogenin gene was developed and applied successfully in approximately 20 individuals. Despite the well–known problems of poor DNA preservation and the ever–present possibility of contamination with modern DNA, genetic analysis of the Norris Farms No. 36 population demonstrates that ancient DNA can be a fruitful source of new insights into prehistoric populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1999.0368

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Norris Farms #36 cemetery was selected for analysis because bone samples from this site had been previously investigated using ancient DNA techniques, and mtDNA haplogroup assignments and HVRI sequences are available for 108 and 52 individuals, respectively, making it the most intensively studied pre-Contact North American site to date.

    “The Norris Farms #36 cemetery was selected for analysis because bone samples from this site had been previously investigated using ancient DNA techniques (Stone and Stoneking, 1993, 1998, 1999), and mtDNA haplogroup assignments and HVRI sequences are available for 108 and 52 individuals, respectively, making it the most intensively studied pre‐Contact North American site to date.”

    From Successful enrichment and recovery of whole mitochondrial genomes from ancient human dental calculus (2016) · cites this paper as Stone and Stoneking, 1999

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Anderson S., Bankier A. T., Barrell B. G., de Bruijn M. H., Coulson A. R., Drouin J., Eperon I. C., Nierlich D. P., Roe B. A., Sanger F. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457–465. doi: 10.1038/290457a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. Bailliet G., Rothhammer F., Carnese F. R., Bravi C. M., Bianchi N. O. Founder mitochondrial haplotypes in Amerindian populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Jul;55(1):27–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Batista O., Kolman C. J., Bermingham E. Mitochondrial DNA diversity in the Kuna Amerinds of Panamá. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 May;4(5):921–929. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.5.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. Easton R. D., Merriwether D. A., Crews D. E., Ferrell R. E. mtDNA variation in the Yanomami: evidence for additional New World founding lineages. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jul;59(1):213–225. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forster P., Harding R., Torroni A., Bandelt H. J. Origin and evolution of Native American mtDNA variation: a reappraisal. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Oct;59(4):935–945. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ginther C., Corach D., Penacino G. A., Rey J. A., Carnese F. R., Hutz M. H., Anderson A., Just J., Salzano F. M., King M. C. Genetic variation among the Mapuche Indians from the Patagonian region of Argentina: mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and allele frequencies of several nuclear genes. EXS. 1993;67:211–219. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8583-6_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. Hagelberg E., Clegg J. B. Genetic polymorphisms in prehistoric Pacific islanders determined by analysis of ancient bone DNA. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 May 22;252(1334):163–170. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. Höss M., Jaruga P., Zastawny T. H., Dizdaroglu M., Päbo S. DNA damage and DNA sequence retrieval from ancient tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Apr 1;24(7):1304–1307. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.7.1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. Kolman C. J., Bermingham E., Cooke R., Ward R. H., Arias T. D., Guionneau-Sinclair F. Reduced mtDNA diversity in the Ngöbé Amerinds of Panamá. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):275–283. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. Kolman C. J., Bermingham E. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA diversity in the Chocó and Chibcha Amerinds of Panamá. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1289–1302. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. Kolman C. J., Sambuughin N., Bermingham E. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Mongolian populations and implications for the origin of New World founders. Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1321–1334. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. Lalueza Fox C. Mitochondrial DNA Haplogroups in Four Tribes from Tierra del Fuego-Patagonia: Inferences about the Peopling of the Americas. Hum Biol. 1996 Dec;68(6):853–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Milner G. R., Humpf D. A., Harpending H. C. Pattern matching of age-at-death distributions in paleodemographic analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Sep;80(1):49–58. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330800107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. Parr R. L., Carlyle S. W., O'Rourke D. H. Ancient DNA analysis of Fremont Amerindians of the Great Salt Lake Wetlands. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996 Apr;99(4):507–518. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199604)99:4<507::AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. Poinar H. N., Höss M., Bada J. L., Päbo S. Amino acid racemization and the preservation of ancient DNA. Science. 1996 May 10;272(5263):864–866. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5263.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. Santos M., Ward R. H., Barrantes R. mtDNA variation in the Chibcha Amerindian Huetar from Costa Rica. Hum Biol. 1994 Dec;66(6):963–977. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schurr T. G., Ballinger S. W., Gan Y. Y., Hodge J. A., Merriwether D. A., Lawrence D. N., Knowler W. C., Weiss K. M., Wallace D. C. Amerindian mitochondrial DNAs have rare Asian mutations at high frequencies, suggesting they derived from four primary maternal lineages. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Mar;46(3):613–623. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shields G. F., Schmiechen A. M., Frazier B. L., Redd A., Voevoda M. I., Reed J. K., Ward R. H. mtDNA sequences suggest a recent evolutionary divergence for Beringian and northern North American populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Sep;53(3):549–562. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stone A. C., Milner G. R., Päbo S., Stoneking M. Sex determination of ancient human skeletons using DNA. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1996 Feb;99(2):231–238. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199602)99:2<231::AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. Stone A. C., Stoneking M. mtDNA analysis of a prehistoric Oneota population: implications for the peopling of the New World. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 May;62(5):1153–1170. doi: 10.1086/301838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Torroni A., Schurr T. G., Cabell M. F., Brown M. D., Neel J. V., Larsen M., Smith D. G., Vullo C. M., Wallace D. C. Asian affinities and continental radiation of the four founding Native American mtDNAs. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Sep;53(3):563–590. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ubelaker D. H. Patterns of demographic change in the Americas. Hum Biol. 1992 Jun;64(3):361–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ward R. H., Frazier B. L., Dew-Jager K., Päbo S. Extensive mitochondrial diversity within a single Amerindian tribe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 1;88(19):8720–8724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. Zierdt H., Hummel S., Herrmann B. Amplification of human short tandem repeats from medieval teeth and bone samples. Hum Biol. 1996 Apr;68(2):185–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, A. C., & Stoneking, M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1999-01-29
Volume
354
Issue
1379
Pages
153-159
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2015876096
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
Keywords
ancient DNA, mtDNA haplogroups, nuclear DNA, European contact, population size reduction, DNA contamination, prehistoric population genetics
MeSH terms
Dental Enamel Proteins, DNA, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Humans, Illinois, Indians, North American, Male, Paleontology, Sex Determination Analysis, Genetic Variation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Evolution, Molecular, History, Medieval, Amelogenin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review