The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling
Open accessAbstract
In this, the first of three papers, the nature of, and motivation for, neuronal transients is described in relation to characterizing brain dynamics. This paper deals with some basic aspects of neuronal dynamics, interactions, coupling and implicit neuronal codes. The second paper develops neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling in the context of dynamic instability and complexity, and suggests that instability or lability is necessary for adaptive self–organization. The final paper addresses the role of neuronal transients through information theory and the emergence of spatio–temporal receptive fields and functional specialization. By considering the brain as an ensemble of connected dynamic systems one can show that a sufficient description of neuronal dynamics comprises neuronal activity at a particular time and its recent history. This history constitutes a neuronal transient. As such, transients represent a fundamental metric of neuronal interactions and, implicitly, a code employed in the functional integration of brain systems. The nature of transients, expressed conjointly in distinct neuronal populations, reflects the underlying coupling among populations. This coupling may be synchronous (and possibly oscillatory) or asynchronous. A critical distinction between synchronous and asynchronous coupling is that the former is essentially linear and the latter is nonlinear. The nonlinear nature of asynchronous coupling enables the rich, context–sensitive interactions that characterize real brain dynamics, suggesting that it plays a role in functional integration that may be as important as synchronous interactions. The distinction between linear and nonlinear coupling has fundamental implications for the analysis and characterization of neuronal interactions, most of which are predicated on linear (synchronous) coupling (e.g. crosscorrelograms and coherence). Using neuromagnetic data it is shown that nonlinear (asynchronous) coupling is, in fact, more abundant and can be more significant than synchronous coupling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070 · cited 1×
“…prefrontal and parietal regions in the MEG analyses was that both these regions are thought to participate in distributed attentional systems (e.g. Posner & Petersen 1990) and indeed our own work with fMRI in human subjects suggests a modulatory role for prefrontal ^ parietal projections (BÏchel…”
BackgroundAttentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST
Treue, S., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382539a0 · Cited by 1,025
Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance
Bressler, S. L., Coppola, R., & Nakamura, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366153a0 · Cited by 533
A model of hippocampal function
Burgess, N., Recce, M., & O'Keefe, J. (1994) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80159-5 · Cited by 393
Cited by
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects
Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., & Beckmann, C. F. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601417103 · Cited by 4,326
Organization, development and function of complex brain networks
SPORNS, O., CHIALVO, D., KAISER, M., & HILGETAG, C. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.008 · Cited by 2,055
Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography
Brookes, M. J., Woolrich, M., Luckhoo, H., Price, D., Hale, J. R., Stephenson, M. C., Barnes, G. R., Smith, S. M., & Morris, P. G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112685108 · Cited by 938
The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex
Passingham, R. E., Stephan, K. E., & Kötter, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn893 · Cited by 1,024
Tognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.022 · Cited by 718
Isomura, Y., Sirota, A., Özen, S., Montgomery, S., Mizuseki, K., Henze, D. A., & Buzsáki, G. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.023 · Cited by 500
Integrated information theory of consciousness: an updated account.
(2012) · PubMed · doi:10.4449/aib.v149i5.1388 · Cited by 370
Disordered connectivity in the autistic brain: Challenges for the ‘new psychophysiology’
Rippon, G., Brock, J., Brown, C., & Boucher, J. (2007) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.012 · Cited by 308
Hemodynamic correlates of EEG: a heuristic
Kilner, J. M., Mattout, J., Henson, R., & Friston, K. J. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.008 · Cited by 206
Reversal of cortical information flow during visual imagery as compared to visual perception
Dentico, D., Cheung, B. L., Chang, J.-Y., Guokas, J., Boly, M., Tononi, G., & Van Veen, B. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.081 · Cited by 157
“, 2012) approaches is that the MVAR GC model does not explicitly represent nonlinear interactions between brain regions (Friston, 2000).”
BackgroundNonlinear synchronization in EEG and whole‐head MEG recordings of healthy subjects
Stam, C. J., Breakspear, M., van Walsum, A. V. C., & van Dijk, B. W. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10106 · Cited by 174
Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients
Friston, K. J. (2001) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840100700510 · Cited by 141
Self-citationDynamic causal modelling of induced responses
Chen, C. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.026 · Cited by 136
Waves of consciousness: ongoing cortical patterns during binocular rivalry
Cosmelli, D., David, O., Lachaux, J.-P., Martinerie, J., Garnero, L., Renault, B., & Varela, F. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.008 · Cited by 131
"Dynamic" Connectivity in Neural Systems
Breakspear, M. (2004) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1385/ni:2:2:205 · Cited by 113
Llewellyn, S. (2016) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.018 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Friston, K. J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2000-02-29
- Volume
- 355
- Issue
- 1394
- Pages
- 215-236
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W1993148254
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
