CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 136Neural dynamics and brain functionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses

Chen, C.C., Kiebel, S.J., Friston, K.J.·2008·NeuroImage
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper describes a dynamic causal model (DCM) for induced or spectral responses as measured with the electroencephalogram (EEG) or the magnetoencephalogram (MEG). We model the time-varying power, over a range of frequencies, as the response of a distributed system of coupled electromagnetic sources to a spectral perturbation. The model parameters encode the frequency response to exogenous input and coupling among sources and different frequencies. The Bayesian inversion of this model, given data enables inferences about the parameters of a particular model and allows us to compare different models, or hypotheses. One key aspect of the model is that it differentiates between linear and non-linear coupling; which correspond to within and between-frequency coupling respectively. To establish the face validity of our approach, we generate synthetic data and test the identifiability of various parameters to ensure they can be estimated accurately, under different levels of noise. We then apply our model to EEG data from a face-perception experiment, to ask whether there is evidence for non-linear coupling between early visual cortex and fusiform areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.026

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials, induced responses, or steady-state responses.

    “DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials (David et al., 2006), induced responses (Chen et al., 2008), or steady-state responses (Moran et al., 2009).”

    From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2008

  • DCM is used routinely to invert models with thousands of free parameters.

    “Having said this, DCM is used routinely to invert models with thousands of free parameters (e.g. DCM for induced electromagnetic sources; Chen et al. 2008).”

    From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Chen, C. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Chen, C.C.
ORCID
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
1293-1312
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.026
OpenAlex
W2013176407
Cited by
136
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (088130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
dynamic causal modeling, induced responses, spectral response, EEG, MEG, Bayesian parameter estimation, model comparison, nonlinear coupling, parameter identifiability, face perception, fusiform gyrus, early visual cortex, distributed source model
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electroencephalography, Humans, Synapses, Magnetoencephalography, Models, Statistical, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review