Cited by 30Origins and Evolution of LifeCellular Automata and ApplicationsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Synthetic Turing protocells: vesicle self-reproduction through symmetry-breaking instabilities

Open access
Macía, Javier, Solé, Ricard V·2007·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The reproduction of a living cell requires a repeatable set of chemical events to be properly coordinated. Such events define a replication cycle, coupling the growth and shape change of the cell membrane with internal metabolic reactions. Although the logic of such process is determined by potentially simple physico-chemical laws, modelling of a full, self-maintained cell cycle is not trivial. Here we present a novel approach to the problem that makes use of so-called symmetry breaking instabilities as the engine of cell growth and division. It is shown that the process occurs as a consequence of the breaking of spatial symmetry and provides a reliable mechanism of vesicle growth and reproduction. Our model opens the possibility of a synthetic protocell lacking information but displaying self-reproduction under a very simple set of chemical reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2007.2074

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models have shown that cell division through growth and instability is possible in an information-free context where only metabolism and compartment are present, both in amphiphile-based vesicles and micelles.

    “But models have also shown that such a possibility exists in an information-free context where only metabolism and compartment are present, both in amphiphile-based vesicles [167–169] and micelles [164,170].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [168]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macía, J., & Solé, R. V.
Affiliations
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Macía, Javier
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2007-05-09
Volume
362
Issue
1486
Pages
1821-1829
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2137490447
Cited by
30
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Santa Fe Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
synthetic protocells, symmetry-breaking instability, cell division, cell growth, cell cycle, membrane growth, chemical reaction networks, self-replication
MeSH terms
Cell Membrane, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Models, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review