Cited by 90Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

The effect of climate anomalies and human ignition factor on wildfires in Russian boreal forests

Open access
Achard, Frédéric, Eva, Hugh D, Mollicone, Danilo, Beuchle, René·2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Over the last few years anomalies in temperature and precipitation in northern Russia have been regarded as manifestations of climate change. During the same period exceptional forest fire seasons have been reported, prompting many authors to suggest that these in turn are due to climate change. In this paper, we examine the number and areal extent of forest fires across boreal Russia for the period 2002–2005 within two forest categories: ‘intact forests’ and ‘non-intact forests’. Results show a far lower density of fire events in intact forests (5–14 times less) and that those events tend to be in the first 10 km buffer zone inside intact forest areas. Results also show that, during exceptional climatic years (2002 and 2003), fire event density is twice that found during normal years (2004 and 2005) and average areal extent of fire events (burned area) in intact forests is 2.5 times larger than normal. These results suggest that a majority of the fire events in boreal Russia are of human origin and a maximum of one-third of their impact (areal extension) can be attributed to climate anomalies alone, the rest being due to the combined effect of human disturbances and climate anomalies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2007.2203

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In many regions, humans account for the majority of ignitions and burned area, replacing lightning as the primary ignition source.

    “In many regions, humans account for the majority of ignitions and burned area, replacing lightning as the primary ignition source (Achard, Eva, Mollicone, & Beuchle, 2008;Lasslop & Kloster, 2017).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Achard, Eva, Mollicone, & Beuchle, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Mollicone, D., & Beuchle, R.
Affiliations
European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Achard, Frédéric
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2007-11-15
Volume
363
Issue
1501
Pages
2329-2337
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2051525273
Cited by
90
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
forest fires, boreal forest, climate anomalies, human ignition, fire origin, burned area, intact forests, climate change, northern Russia
MeSH terms
Climate, Fires, Humans, Human Activities, Russia, Trees, Databases, Factual, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review