The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why the brain talks to itself: sources of error in emotional prediction
Open accessAbstract
People typically choose pleasure over pain. But how do they know which of these their choices will entail? The brain generates mental simulations (previews) of future events, which produce affective reactions (premotions), which are then used as a basis for forecasts (predictions) about the future event's emotional consequences. Research shows that this process leads to systematic errors of prediction. We review evidence indicating that these errors can be traced to five sources.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Returning to Figure 1, each preview is associated with emotional arousal described as a “premotion”.”
From Extension of the Transdiagnostic Model to Focus on Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Treatment (2014) · cites this paper as Gilbert & Wilson, 2009
In the citing paper
“The premotion occurs as a direct consequence of the preview the individual has made (Gilbert & Wilson, 2009).”
From Extension of the Transdiagnostic Model to Focus on Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Treatment (2014) · cites this paper as Gilbert & Wilson, 2009
In the citing paper
“These estimates may be drawn from cognitive biases in our memories of past experiences (see further Gilbert & Wilson, 2009).”
From Extension of the Transdiagnostic Model to Focus on Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Treatment (2014) · cites this paper as Gilbert & Wilson, 2009
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,472
Tulving, E. (1985) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0080017 · Cited by 4,638
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403 · Cited by 3,006
Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5 · Cited by 2,447
Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 2×
“…future events are produced in large part by the frontal regions of the brain (Ingvar 1985; Wheeler et al. 1997; Fellows & Farah 2005), which are especially activated when people are asked to simulate the future (Addis et al. 2007; Buckner & Carroll 2007; Schacter et al. 2007; Szpunar et al. 2007).”
BackgroundTau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders
Ballatore, C., Lee, V. M.-Y., & Trojanowski, J. Q. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2194 · Cited by 2,174
Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1986) · Raven Press eBooks · Cited by 2,102
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Loewenstein G., 2003, Time and decision, 351
- Morewedge C.K. Gilbert D.T. Kassam K.S. Myrseth K.O.R.& Wilson T.D. Consuming experiences: the problem of shifting standards in affective forecasting. 2007 Cambridge MA:Harvard University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–149 of 149
Martínez-Taboada, C., Albeza, A., Amutio, A., & Nicolae, G. B. (2017) · Terapia psicológica · doi:10.4067/s0718-48082017000200173 · Cited by 3
Omitted Variables in the Geographical Treatment of Well-Being and Happiness
Simandan, D. (2014) · Geography Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/150491 · Cited by 3
Ferreira, S., Moro, M., & Heinz Welsch, B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4691173 · Cited by 4
Chopik, W. J. (2015) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 2
Everything is going to be okay: emotion regulation and immune neglect in affective forecasting
Patel, P., & Urry, H. L. (2025) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2025.2511974 · Cited by 2
The neural basis of cognitive processing: A review and a speculative architecture
Verwey, W. B. (2025) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106351 · Cited by 4
Xi, L. U., & HS, E. (2018) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.00827 · Cited by 2
Focusing the ‘Gaze’ on Facilitators of Simulation
Leigh, E., & Naweed, A. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9582-7_1 · Cited by 2
Focusing Illusion in Affective Forecasting
Hanbing, L. U. O., Fuming, X. U., Yongyu, G. U. O., ZHENG, Q., Li, B., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.01482 · Cited by 2
Sight Beyond Sight: A Conceptual Exploration of the ‘Gaze’ in Facilitating Simulations
Naweed, A., & Leigh, E. (2021) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/10468781211006154 · Cited by 2
On the causes and interventions of affective forecasting bias
Sun, L., Tao, D. U. A. N., & Ning, C. H. E. N. (2020) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2020.02018 · Cited by 1
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Adaptation, anticipation-bias and optimal income taxation
Aronsson, T., & Schöb, R. (2012) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/fudocs_document_000000013775 · Cited by 1
Predicting Emotional Reactions
Sharot, T. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381431-9.00003-6 · Cited by 1
Assessment and Evaluation of Learning via Simulation
Radonyi, P., & Leigh, E. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78795-4_9 · Cited by 1
Lu, D., Jiao, R., Li, F., Lin, X., & Yin, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838765 · Cited by 1
Lu, D., Jiao, R.-K., Li, F., Yin, H., & Lin, X. (2022) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-04-2022-0100 · Cited by 1
Listening to the consumer's voice in website analytics
Bunker, M. P., Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Bartholomew, D. E. (2016) · International Journal of Business Information Systems · doi:10.1504/ijbis.2016.078025 · Cited by 1
Social-Psychological Insights on Improving Blind People’s Employment Outcomes
Silverman, A. M. (2014) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · Cited by 1
Crawford, B., Muhlert, N., MacDonald, G., & Lawrence, A. D. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.916999 · Cited by 2
Neural Computations Underpinning Anxiety in Health and Disease
Walters, C. J. (2021) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 1
Tobia, K. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170901.001 · Cited by 1
Plans as Emotion Regulation Tools? Examining the Consequences of Planning on Affect
Friesdorf, R. (2015) · Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)
Affective Forecasting: the Effects of Immune Neglect and Surrogation
Burkman, S. D. (2012) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.12794/metadc149566
Knowing what's next: The role of the cerebellum in generating predictions
Knolle, F. (2012) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
THE ELEPHANT AND THE RIDER: THE PREFRONTAL CORTEX, ATTENTION REGULATION, AND EUDAEMONIC WELLBEING
Thornley, N., & Lerner, J. V. (2012)
Cross-modal predictive mechanisms during speech perception
García, S. (2013) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
Further Evidences of the role of Personality on Affective Forecasting
Hansenne, M., & Christophe, V. (2019) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.24425/ppb.2019.130700 · Cited by 1
Young, J. H. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119767398.furread
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.002.0003
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0002
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.002.0004
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0007
Feelings Versus Representations of Value
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0005
Indicatives Versus Imperatives
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0006
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0008
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.002.0006
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0001
Traditional Critiques Critiqued
Carruthers, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198906131.003.0004
Xie, A., Liu, P., Zhou, Q., Chen, T., Ding, D., & Zhang, R. (2025) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-025-01002-z
Psychology and Jurisprudence across the Curriculum
Spellman, B. A., Robbennolt, J. K., Nadler, J., & Wilkinson‐Ryan, T. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170901.003
Traité de régulation des émotions
André, C. (2012) · Carrefour des psychothérapies · doi:10.3917/dbu.mikol.2012.01.0527
Philips, R. V., Vögele, C., Baeken, C., Öz, İ. T., Harris, J. M., Petieau, M., & Brevers, D. (2026) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag014
Pilotti, L., & Carena, A. (2022) · Journal of Business & Economic Policy · doi:10.30845/jbep.v9n4p4
The motoric theory of curiosity
Carruthers, P. (2026) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.70017
Meyrat, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-50013-9_4
Feng, Y., & Lu, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1843889
Using episodic future thinking (or not?) to optimize decision-making
Atance, C. M., & McCormack, T. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-026-02974-9
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gilbert, Daniel T.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2009-05-12
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 1521
- Pages
- 1335-1341
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC2666705
- OpenAlex
- W2112835752
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0722132)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- prediction error, mental simulation, affective forecasting, pleasure and pain, decision-making, cognitive biases
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Brain, Concept Formation, Emotions, Humans, Imagination, Mental Processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review