Cited by 74Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

The conservation value of South East Asia's highly degraded forests: evidence from leaf-litter ants

Open access
Woodcock, Paul, Edwards, David P., Fayle, Tom M., Newton, Rob J., Khen, Chey Vun, Bottrell, Simon H., Hamer, Keith C.·2011·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

South East Asia is widely regarded as a centre of threatened biodiversity owing to extensive logging and forest conversion to agriculture. In particular, forests degraded by repeated rounds of intensive logging are viewed as having little conservation value and are afforded meagre protection from conversion to oil palm. Here, we determine the biological value of such heavily degraded forests by comparing leaf-litter ant communities in unlogged (natural) and twice-logged forests in Sabah, Borneo. We accounted for impacts of logging on habitat heterogeneity by comparing species richness and composition at four nested spatial scales, and examining how species richness was partitioned across the landscape in each habitat. We found that twice-logged forest had fewer species occurrences, lower species richness at small spatial scales and altered species composition compared with natural forests. However, over 80 per cent of species found in unlogged forest were detected within twice-logged forest. Moreover, greater species turnover among sites in twice-logged forest resulted in identical species richness between habitats at the largest spatial scale. While two intensive logging cycles have negative impacts on ant communities, these degraded forests clearly provide important habitat for numerous species and preventing their conversion to oil palm and other crops should be a conservation priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2011.0031

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Indonesia, very low-productivity grasslands and logged forests are both categorized as degraded despite huge differences in their current use and the environmental impacts of conversion.

    “in Indonesia, very low-productivity grasslands and logged forests are both categorized as degraded despite huge differences in their current use and the environmental impacts of conversion (Edwards et al., 2011;Fairhurst & McLaughlin, 2009;Woodcock et al., 2011).”

    From Mapping the world's degraded lands (2015) · cites this paper as Woodcock et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]International Tropical Timber Association (ITTO) 2008. Annual review and assessment of the world timber situation. Yokohama, Japan: ITTO; See http://www.itto.int/en/annual_review (accessed November 2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. [52]Brühl C. A. 2001. Leaf litter ant communities in tropical lowland rain forests in Sabah, Malaysia: effects of forest disturbance and fragmentation. PhD thesis, University of Würzberg, Würzburg
  3. [61]Harvey P. H., Pagel M. D. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology (Oxford series in ecology and evolution). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodcock, P., Edwards, D. P., Fayle, T. M., Newton, R. J., Khen, C. V., Bottrell, S. H., & Hamer, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
  • Sabah Forestry Department (MY)
Corresponding author
Woodcock, Paul
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2011-11-27
Volume
366
Issue
1582
Pages
3256-3264
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2123861200
Cited by
74
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
degraded forest, leaf litter ants, ant communities, species richness, species composition, species turnover, habitat heterogeneity, spatial scale, oil palm conversion, forest conservation, Borneo, Sabah, tropical forest biodiversity
MeSH terms
Animals, Ants, Conservation of Natural Resources, Malaysia, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Species Specificity, Trees, Forestry, Ecosystem, Plant Leaves, Arecaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review