The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity, classification and function of the plant protein kinase superfamily
Open accessAbstract
Eukaryotic protein kinases belong to a large superfamily with hundreds to thousands of copies and are components of essentially all cellular functions. The goals of this study are to classify protein kinases from 25 plant species and to assess their evolutionary history in conjunction with consideration of their molecular functions. The protein kinase superfamily has expanded in the flowering plant lineage, in part through recent duplications. As a result, the flowering plant protein kinase repertoire, or kinome, is in general significantly larger than other eukaryotes, ranging in size from 600 to 2500 members. This large variation in kinome size is mainly due to the expansion and contraction of a few families, particularly the receptor-like kinase/Pelle family. A number of protein kinases reside in highly conserved, low copy number families and often play broadly conserved regulatory roles in metabolism and cell division, although functions of plant homologues have often diverged from their metazoan counterparts. Members of expanded plant kinase families often have roles in plant-specific processes and some may have contributed to adaptive evolution. Nonetheless, non-adaptive explanations, such as kinase duplicate subfunctionalization and insufficient time for pseudogenization, may also contribute to the large number of seemingly functional protein kinases in plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
The Pfam protein families database
Finn, R. D., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Coggill, P., Heger, A., Pollington, J. E., Gavin, O. L., Gunasekaran, P., Ceric, G., Forslund, K., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp985 · Cited by 2,694
LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade
Woods, A., Johnstone, S. R., Dickerson, K., Leiper, F. C., Fryer, L. G. D., Neumann, D., Schlattner, U., Wallimann, T., Carlson, M., & Carling, D. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.031 · Cited by 1,650
AMP-activated protein kinase: an energy sensor that regulates all aspects of cell function
Hardie, D. G. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.17420111 · Cited by 1,638
The genome of the cucumber,Cucumis sativus L
Huang, S., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Li, L., Gu, X., Fan, W., Lucas, W. J., Wang, X., Xie, B., Ni, P., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.475 · Cited by 1,490
The nuts and bolts of AGC protein kinases
Pearce, L. R., Komander, D., & Alessi, D. R. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2822 · Cited by 1,294
The genome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis and the origin of metazoans
King, N., Westbrook, M. J., Young, S. L., Kuo, A., Abedin, M., Chapman, J., Fairclough, S., Hellsten, U., Isogai, Y., Letunic, I., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06617 · Cited by 1,139
A Molecular Timeline for the Origin of Photosynthetic Eukaryotes
Yoon, H. S., Hackett, J. D., Ciniglia, C., Pinto, G., & Bhattacharya, D. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh075 · Cited by 945
HEF1-Dependent Aurora A Activation Induces Disassembly of the Primary Cilium
Pugacheva, E. N., Jablonski, S. A., Hartman, T. R., Henske, E. P., & Golemis, E. A. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.035 · Cited by 890
Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations
Gu, Z., Steinmetz, L. M., Gu, X., Scharfe, C., Davis, R. W., & Li, W.-H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01198 · Cited by 889
Cited by
Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants
Panchy, N., Lehti-Shiu, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.00523 · Cited by 1,757
Self-citationOrigin and evolution of the plant immune system
Han, G. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15596 · Cited by 282
Origin and Diversity of Plant Receptor-Like Kinases
Dievart, A., Gottin, C., Périn, C., Ranwez, V., & Chantret, N. (2020) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-073019-025927 · Cited by 269
Plant Malectin-Like Receptor Kinases: From Cell Wall Integrity to Immunity and Beyond
Franck, C. M., Westermann, J., & Boisson-Dernier, A. (2018) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040557 · Cited by 267
Evolutionary trajectory of pattern recognition receptors in plants
(2024) · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44408-3 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehti-Shiu, M. D., & Shiu, S.-H.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-09-19
- Volume
- 367
- Issue
- 1602
- Pages
- 2619-2639
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2128668364
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity, classification and function of the plant protein kinase superfamily. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2012.0003
- The paper
- Lehti-Shiu, M. D., & Shiu, S.-H. (2012). Diversity, classification and function of the plant protein kinase superfamily. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
