The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis
Open accessAbstract
Although most studies on integration and modularity have focused on variation among individuals within populations or species, this is not the only level of variation for which integration and modularity exist. Multiple levels of biological variation originate from distinct sources: genetic variation, phenotypic plasticity resulting from environmental heterogeneity, fluctuating asymmetry from random developmental variation and, at the interpopulation or interspecific levels, evolutionary change. The processes that produce variation at all these levels can impart integration or modularity on the covariance structure among morphological traits. In turn, studies of the patterns of integration and modularity can inform about the underlying processes. In particular, the methods of geometric morphometrics offer many advantages for such studies because they can characterize the patterns of morphological variation in great detail and maintain the anatomical context of the structures under study. This paper reviews biological concepts and analytical methods for characterizing patterns of variation and for comparing across levels. Because research comparing patterns across level has only just begun, there are relatively few results, generalizations are difficult and many biological and statistical questions remain unanswered. Nevertheless, it is clear that research using this approach can take advantage of an abundance of new possibilities that are so far largely unexplored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance
Farner, D. S. (1983) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/auk/100.2.507 · Cited by 2,490
The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance
Mayr, E. (1982) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,295
ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY
GOULD, S. J. (1966) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1966.tb01624.x · Cited by 2,280
PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY
Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x · Cited by 1,914
ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE
Schluter, D. (1996) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03563.x · Cited by 1,261
Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry
Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., & Meyer, A. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,109
Self-citationWagner, G. P., Pavlicev, M., & Cheverud, J. M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2267 · Cited by 987
Morphological integration and developmental modularity
Klingenberg, C. P. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110054 · Cited by 863
Self-citationPHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM
Cheverud, J. M. (1982) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05070.x · Cited by 856
Klingenberg, C. P., & McIntyre, G. S. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02018.x · Cited by 807
Self-citation
Cited by
Adams, D. C. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12511 · Cited by 257
The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors
Bright, J. A., Marugán-Lobón, J., Cobb, S. N., & Rayfield, E. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602683113 · Cited by 258
Approaches to Macroevolution: 1. General Concepts and Origin of Variation
Jablonski, D. (2017) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-017-9420-0 · Cited by 159
Goswami, A., & Finarelli, J. A. (2016) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12956 · Cited by 99
Morphological consequences of artificial cranial deformation: Modularity and integration
Püschel, T. A., Friess, M., & Manríquez, G. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227362 · Cited by 22
“Even though the majority of the studies on modularity and integration have focused on variation among individuals within populations, there are more levels of variation that exhibit modularity and integration [9], deriving from distinct sources such as genetic variation, phenotypic plasticity, fluctuating asymmetry, e…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Klingenberg, C. P.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2014-08-19
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 1649
- Pages
- 20130249
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2133866716
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 31.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2013.0249
- The paper
- Klingenberg, C. P. (2014). Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.