The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data
Open accessAbstract
Individual people differ in their ability to reason, solve problems, think abstractly, plan and learn. A reliable measure of this general ability, also known as intelligence, can be derived from scores across a diverse set of cognitive tasks. There is great interest in understanding the neural underpinnings of individual differences in intelligence, because it is the single best predictor of long-term life success. The most replicated neural correlate of human intelligence to date is total brain volume; however, this coarse morphometric correlate says little about function. Here, we ask whether measurements of the activity of the resting brain (resting-state fMRI) might also carry information about intelligence. We used the final release of the Young Adult Human Connectome Project ( N = 884 subjects after exclusions), providing a full hour of resting-state fMRI per subject; controlled for gender, age and brain volume; and derived a reliable estimate of general intelligence from scores on multiple cognitive tasks. Using a cross-validated predictive framework, we predicted 20% of the variance in general intelligence in the sampled population from their resting-state connectivity matrices. Interestingly, no single anatomical structure or network was responsible or necessary for this prediction, which instead relied on redundant information distributed across the brain. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955
Sudlow, C., Gallacher, J., Allen, N., Beral, V., Burton, P., Danesh, J., Downey, P., Elliott, P., Green, J., Landray, M., et al. (2015) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · Cited by 12,728
The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. (2011) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2011.37 · Cited by 9,381
The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Thomas Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · Cited by 9,182
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 · Cited by 7,429
The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011 · Cited by 7,304
"General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412107 · Cited by 6,207
NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations
Valiev, M., Bylaska, E. J., Govind, N., Kowalski, K., Straatsma, T. P., Van Dam, H. J. J., Wang, D., Nieplocha, J., Apra, E., Windus, T. L., et al. (2010) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · Cited by 5,779
Cited by
Establishment of Best Practices for Evidence for Prediction: A Review
Poldrack, R. A., Huckins, G., & Varoquaux, G. (2020) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3671 · Cited by 738
Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging
Scheinost, D., Noble, S., Horien, C., Greene, A. S., Lake, E. M., Salehi, M., Gao, S., Shen, X., O'Connor, D., Barron, D. S., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.057 · Cited by 381
Sui, J., Jiang, R., Bustillo, J., & Calhoun, V. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.016 · Cited by 309
Brain–phenotype models fail for individuals who defy sample stereotypes
Greene, A. S., Shen, X., Noble, S., Horien, C., Hahn, C. A., Arora, J., Tokoglu, F., Spann, M. N., Carrión, C. I., Barron, D. S., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05118-w · Cited by 167
Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences
Deary, I. J., Cox, S. R., & Hill, W. D. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01027-y · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubois, J., Galdi, P., Paul, L. K., & Adolphs, R.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2018-08-13
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 1756
- Pages
- 20170284
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2791781046
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2017.0284
- The paper
- Dubois, J., Galdi, P., Paul, L. K., & Adolphs, R. (2018). A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
