Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outbreak analytics: a developing data science for informing the response to emerging pathogens

Open access
Polonsky, Jonathan A., Baidjoe, Amrish, Kamvar, Zhian N., Cori, Anne, Durski, Kara, Edmunds, W. John, Eggo, Rosalind M., Funk, Sebastian, Kaiser, Laurent, Keating, Patrick, de Waroux, Olivier le Polain, Marks, Michael, Moraga, Paula, Morgan, Oliver, Nouvellet, Pierre, Ratnayake, Ruwan, Roberts, Chrissy H., Whitworth, Jimmy, Jombart, Thibaut·2019·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Despite continued efforts to improve health systems worldwide, emerging pathogen epidemics remain a major public health concern. Effective response to such outbreaks relies on timely intervention, ideally informed by all available sources of data. The collection, visualization and analysis of outbreak data are becoming increasingly complex, owing to the diversity in types of data, questions and available methods to address them. Recent advances have led to the rise of outbreak analytics, an emerging data science focused on the technological and methodological aspects of the outbreak data pipeline, from collection to analysis, modelling and reporting to inform outbreak response. In this article, we assess the current state of the field. After laying out the context of outbreak response, we critically review the most common analytics components, their inter-dependencies, data requirements and the type of information they can provide to inform operations in real time. We discuss some challenges and opportunities and conclude on the potential role of outbreak analytics for improving our understanding of, and response to outbreaks of emerging pathogens. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: epidemic forecasting and control‘. This theme issue is linked with the earlier issue ‘Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: approaches and important themes’.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2018.0276

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Polonsky, J. A., Baidjoe, A., Kamvar, Z. N., Cori, A., Durski, K., Edmunds, W. J., Eggo, R. M., Funk, S., Kaiser, L., Keating, P., de Waroux, O. L. P., Marks, M., Moraga, P., Morgan, O., Nouvellet, P., Ratnayake, R., Roberts, C. H., Whitworth, J., & Jombart, T.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
374
Issue
1776
Pages
20180276
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2946778829
Cited by
174
References
16
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outbreak analytics: a developing data science for informing the response to emerging pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2018.0276
The paper
Polonsky, J. A., Baidjoe, A., Kamvar, Z. N., Cori, A., Durski, K., Edmunds, W. J., Eggo, R. M., Funk, S., Kaiser, L., Keating, P., de Waroux, O. L. P., Marks, M., Moraga, P., Morgan, O., Nouvellet, P., Ratnayake, R., Roberts, C. H., Whitworth, J., & Jombart, T. (2019). Outbreak analytics: a developing data science for informing the response to emerging pathogens. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.