Cited by 732Data Visualization and AnalyticsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesScientific Computing and Data Management

Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography

Open access
Argimón, Silvia, Abudahab, Khalil, Goater, Richard J. E., Fedosejev, Artemij, Bhai, Jyothish, Glasner, Corinna, Feil, Edward J., Holden, Matthew T. G. +4 more·2016·Microbial Genomics

Abstract

Visualization is frequently used to aid our interpretation of complex datasets. Within microbial genomics, visualizing the relationships between multiple genomes as a tree provides a framework onto which associated data (geographical, temporal, phenotypic and epidemiological) are added to generate hypotheses and to explore the dynamics of the system under investigation. Selected static images are then used within publications to highlight the key findings to a wider audience. However, these images are a very inadequate way of exploring and interpreting the richness of the data. There is, therefore, a need for flexible, interactive software that presents the population genomic outputs and associated data in a user-friendly manner for a wide range of end users, from trained bioinformaticians to front-line epidemiologists and health workers. Here, we present Microreact, a web application for the easy visualization of datasets consisting of any combination of trees, geographical, temporal and associated metadata. Data files can be uploaded to Microreact directly via the web browser or by linking to their location (e.g. from Google Drive/Dropbox or via API), and an integrated visualization via trees, maps, timelines and tables provides interactive querying of the data. The visualization can be shared as a permanent web link among collaborators, or embedded within publications to enable readers to explore and download the data. Microreact can act as an end point for any tool or bioinformatic pipeline that ultimately generates a tree, and provides a simple, yet powerful, visualization method that will aid research and discovery and the open sharing of datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/mgen.0.000093

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sensitivity analysis using sequencing data produced survival results nearly identical to those from the modelled p VOC analysis.

    “This yielded nearly identical results in our survival analysis compared with the analysis that uses the modelled p VOC described above (Fig. 2e).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Argimón, S., Abudahab, K., Goater, R. J. E., Fedosejev, A., Bhai, J., Glasner, C., Feil, E. J., Holden, M. T. G., Yeats, C. A., Grundmann, H., Spratt, B. G., & Aanensen, D. M.
Affiliations
  • 1​The Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Aanensen, David M.
Venue
Microbial Genomics
Published
2016-11-30
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
e000093-e000093
ISSN
2057-5858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560057613
Cited by
732
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbial Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (099202, 089472)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (HPRU-2012-10080)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
phylogeography, genomic epidemiology, interactive data visualization, phylogenetic tree, web application, data sharing, metadata integration, interactive querying, data visualization tools
MeSH terms
Microbiological Techniques, Software, Molecular Epidemiology, Internet, Genomics, Information Dissemination, Phylogeography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review