The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as determined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis.
Open accessAbstract
The molecular systematics of 337 strains of basidiomycetous yeasts and yeast-like fungi, representing 230 species in 18 anamorphic and 24 teleomorphic genera, was determined by sequence analysis of the D1/D2 region of the large-subunit rDNA. The data were compared with published sequences of other basidiomycetous fungi. The results demonstrated that the yeast species and genera are phylogenetically distributed among the Microbotryum, Sporidiobolus, Agaricostilbum and Erythrobasidium clades of the Urediniomycetes; the Tremellales, Trichosporonales ord. nov., Filobasidiales and Cystofilobasidiales clades of the Hymenomycetes; and the Ustilaginales, Microstromatales and Malasseziales clades of the Ustilaginomycetes. Genera such as Bensingtonia, Cryptococcus, Rhodotorula and Sporobolomyces are polyphyletic, i.e. they occur in two or more clades. In contrast, other genera, e.g. Bullera, Cystofilobasidium, Fellomyces, Filobasidiella, Filobasidium, Kondoa, Kurtzmanomyces, Leucosporidium, Rhodosporidium, Sporidiobolus and Udeniomyces, are monophyletic. The majority of the species can be identified using D1/D2 analyses, although the internal transcribed spacer region is required to distinguish closely related species. The intergenic spacer region is recommended for additional differentiation of species and strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
(2014) · doi:10.1128/cmr.00126-13 · Cited by 437
Huys, G., Botteldoorn, N., Delvigne, F., De Vuyst, L., Heyndrickx, M., Pot, B., Dubois, J., & Daube, G. (2013) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201300065 · Cited by 132
Edwards, J. E., Forster, R. J., Callaghan, T. M., Dollhofer, V., Dagar, S. S., Cheng, Y., Chang, J., Kittelmann, S., Fliegerova, K., Puniya, A. K., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01657 · Cited by 130
Petter, R., Kang, B. S., Boekhout, T., Davis, B. J., & Kwon-Chung, K. J. (2001) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-147-8-2029 · Cited by 58
Self-citationAroma-enhancing role of Pichia manshurica isolated from Daqu in the brewing of Shanxi Aged Vinegar
Zhang, Q., Huo, N., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., & Hou, H. (2017) · International Journal of Food Properties · doi:10.1080/10942912.2017.1297823 · Cited by 49
Mundra, S., Arora, R., & Stobdan, T. (2011) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-011-0708-4 · Cited by 46
Diversity and molecular determination of wild yeasts in a central Washington State vineyard
Bourret, T. B., Grove, G. G., Vandemark, G. J., Henick-Kling, T., & Glawe, D. A. (2013) · North American Fungi · doi:10.2509/naf2013.008.015 · Cited by 27
Sulo, P., Laurencik, M., Polakova, S., Minarik, G., & Slavikova, E. (2009) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.008938-0 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Fell, J. W., Boekhout, T., Fonseca, A., Scorzetti, G., & Statzell-Tallman, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1351-1371
- ISSN
- 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-5034
- OpenAlex
- W2152475760
- Cited by
- 901
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.