Detection of Haemophilus influenzae in cerebrospinal fluids by polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification
Abstract
Two primer sets were chosen for the detection of Haemophilus influenzae in cerebrospinal fluid by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNA amplification. One primer set was selected from sequences encoding a capsulation-associated protein and reacted with target DNA from all 15 capsulate H. influenzae strains (all serotypes) examined. The other primer set was selected from the DNA sequence of a gene encoding for outer-membrane protein P6 and reacted with the 15 capsulate and 10 non-capsulate strains of H. influenzae tested. This primer set also reacted with the closely related species H. haemolyticus and H. aegyptius, and with two of nine H. parainfluenzae strains. In reconstruction experiments, PCR DNA amplification was able to detect as few as five H. influenzae cells when 40 cycles of amplification were used. Two hundred cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples collected consecutively from patients suffering from meningitis were investigated by PCR; 40 were culture-positive for H. influenzae and 39 of these were also clearly positive in the PCR test with both primer sets. Contamination occurred to some extent with 40 cycles of amplification but was completely eliminated when the number of cycles was reduced to 35. We conclude that the two primer sets are appropriate for the detection of H. influenzae by PCR, each having its own specificity. When these two primer sets are used, PCR is a technique of equivalent sensitivity to culture for the detection of H. influenzae in CSF.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sensitivity of bexA PCR for Haemophilus influenzae ranged from 81% to 100% with a median of 93%, and specificity ranged from 81% to 100% with a median of 94%.
“The sensitivity of bexA PCR ranged from 81% to 100% with a median of 93%, with a specificity ranging from 81% to 100% (median 94%) (54, 58, 65–68).”
From Molecular diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, X., Mair, R., Hatcher, C., Theodore, M. J., Edmond, K., Wu, H. M., Harcourt, B. H., Carvalho, M. D. G. S., Pimenta, F., Nymadawa, P., et al. (2011) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.11.004 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
KENNEDY, W. A., CHANG, S.-J., PURDY, K., LE, T., KILGORE, P. E., KIM, J. S., ANH, D. D., HUONG, P. L. T., DONG, B. Q., TAN, D. M., et al. (2007) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268806007734 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Molecular diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections
Olie, S. E., Andersen, C. Ø., van de Beek, D., & Brouwer, M. C. (2024) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00021-24 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Ketel, R. J., de Wever, B., & van Alphen, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 271-276
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2089399380
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Keywords
- Haemophilus influenzae, cerebrospinal fluid, meningitis, PCR detection, primer specificity, Haemophilus haemolyticus, Haemophilus aegyptius, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, PCR contamination
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, DNA, Bacterial, Haemophilus influenzae, Humans, Meningitis, Haemophilus, Molecular Sequence Data, Sensitivity and Specificity, Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review