Cited by 66Bacterial Infections and VaccinesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Incidence of bacterial meningitis in Asia using enhanced CSF testing: polymerase chain reaction, latex agglutination and culture

Open access
KENNEDY, W. A., CHANG, S-J., PURDY, K., LE, T., KILGORE, P. E., KIM, J. S., ANH, D. D., HUONG, P. L. T. +4 more·2007·Epidemiology and Infection

Abstract

To enhance the detection of bacterial meningitis in an East Asian surveillance study, we employed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bacterial culture, latex agglutination (LA) and polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) testing for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp). The sensitivity and specificity of CSF PCR-EIA testing was compared to LA and culture. A meningitis case was defined by one positive result for any of the three tests. The sensitivity of H. influenzae CSF PCR-EIA, LA, and culture was 100%, 40% and 57.5% respectively; and for Sp CSF PCR-EIA, LA and culture, the sensitivity was 100%, 58.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Hib and Sp specificity was 100% by each method. CSF PCR-EIA was more sensitive than culture or LA for the detection of Hib and Sp meningitis cases increasing their incidence by 74% and 50% compared to culture respectively. CSF PCR-EIA should be included for the detection of bacterial meningitis in surveillance studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0950268806007734

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensitivity of bexA PCR for Haemophilus influenzae ranged from 81% to 100% with a median of 93%, and specificity ranged from 81% to 100% with a median of 94%.

    “The sensitivity of bexA PCR ranged from 81% to 100% with a median of 93%, with a specificity ranging from 81% to 100% (median 94%) (54, 58, 65–68).”

    From Molecular diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Nucleic acid amplification detection assays section identifies the H. influenzae test as using bexA primers. The Comparison of culture with LA and PCR-EIA assays section (page unavailable) reports 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for that test, supporting the upper endpoints of the cited ranges. It does not report the 81% lower endpoints or the 93% and 94% medians across studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The reported sensitivity of PCR for pneumococcal meningitis is high and reached 100% in the majority of studies, with a median of 100% and range 79%-100%.

    “The reported sensitivity of PCR for pneumococcal meningitis is high and reached 100% in the majority of conducted studies (median of 100%, range 79%–100%) (Table 1; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material) (49–58).”

    From Molecular diagnostics in cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Abstract reports 100% sensitivity for pneumococcal (Sp) CSF PCR-EIA in this study, supporting its inclusion among studies reporting high sensitivity. This paper does not establish that a majority of studies reached 100%, or the stated median and 79%–100% range across studies. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. August MH, Huber TW, Sewell KL. Quality Control and Quality Assurance Practices in Clinical Micro- biology, 1st edn. Washington, DC : ASM Press, 1990, pp. 1-19.
  2. Singh SC, et al. Evaluation of polymerase chain reac- tion for diagnosing Haemophilus influenzae b menin- gitis. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 2002 ; 22 : 347-353.
  3. Feikin DR, et al. Rapid assessment tool for Haemophi- lus influenzae type b disease in developing countries. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004 ; 10 : 1270-1276.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KENNEDY, W. A., CHANG, S.-J., PURDY, K., LE, T., KILGORE, P. E., KIM, J. S., ANH, D. D., HUONG, P. L. T., DONG, B. Q., TAN, D. M., CLEMENS, J. D., & WARD, J. I.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • International Vaccine Institute (KR)
  • National Institute Of Hygiene And Epidemiology (VN)
  • Guangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CN)
Corresponding author
KENNEDY, W. A.
Venue
Epidemiology and Infection
Published
2007-02-05
Volume
135
Issue
7
Pages
1217-1226
ISSN
  • 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4409
OpenAlex
W2099033918
Cited by
66
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
bacterial meningitis, latex agglutination test, cerebrospinal fluid culture, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, sensitivity and specificity, meningitis surveillance, incidence estimation, East Asia
MeSH terms
Asia, Bacteriological Techniques, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Latex Fixation Tests, Male, Meningitis, Haemophilus, Meningitis, Pneumococcal, Sensitivity and Specificity, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Colony Count, Microbial, Incidence, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Haemophilus influenzae type b

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review