The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of E6AP-independent degradation targets of HPV E6
Abstract
The high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) E6 oncoprotein is known to contribute to human malignancy by targeting several of its cellular substrates through the ubiquitin-mediated degradation pathway. Previous studies have revealed that E6 interacts with the E6AP ubiquitin-protein ligase and directs its ubiquitylation activity toward several specific cellular proteins, one of the most important of which is p53. However, the role of E6AP in the degradation of many other E6 substrates is still ambiguous because loss of E6AP also induces a loss of E6 expression. To examine this further, we used CRISPR-edited E6AP knockout cells to perform E6 degradation assays in the presence of a catalytically inactive mutant form of E6AP, thus ensuring the stabilization of E6 but with the ligase itself being functionally inactive. Using this system, we found that E6 can mediate the degradation of several PDZ domain-containing proteins independently of E6AP ubiquitin ligase activity. This study thus opens up ways to investigate other possible components of the cellular ubiquitin proteasome pathway that E6 might utilize to target these substrates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“recent evidence suggests that E6 can also target some of its targets (MAGI-1 and Scrib) independently of the E6AP enzymatic activity [177]”
From The Not-So-Good, the Bad and the Ugly: HPV E5, E6 and E7 Oncoproteins in the Orchestration of Carcinogenesis (2021) · cites this paper as [177]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.111 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrc798 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04849.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4680 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1204860 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90409-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JVI.79.14.9296-9300.2005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.13.2.775 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.13.8.4918 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90384-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1202920 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11612 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.20.21.8244-8253.2000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1205668 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1208757 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/onc.2008.352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JVI.78.22.12366-12377.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JVI.01712-06 · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20130783 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08709.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.00809 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.virol.2013.04.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.virol.2009.07.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/JVI.01390-17 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6439 · DOI
Cited by
Basukala, O., & Banks, L. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13101892 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vats, A., Thatte, J., & Banks, L.
- Affiliations
- International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Padriciano 99 I-34149 Trieste, Italy
- ORCID
- Vats, Arushi
- Venue
- Journal of General Virology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2019-12-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1674-1679
- ISSN
- 0022-1317
- 1465-2099
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Associazione Angela Serra per la Ricerca sul Cancro (18578)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review