The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of adherence, biofilm formation and cytotoxicity suggests a greater virulence potential of Gardnerella vaginalis relative to other bacterial-vaginosis-associated anaerobes
Open accessAbstract
Worldwide, bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal disorder in women of childbearing age. BV is characterized by a dramatic shift in the vaginal microflora, involving a relative decrease in lactobacilli, and a proliferation of anaerobes. In most cases of BV, the predominant bacterial species found is Gardnerella vaginalis. However, pure cultures of G. vaginalis do not always result in BV, and asymptomatic women are sometimes colonized with low numbers of G. vaginalis. Thus, there is controversy about whether G. vaginalis is an opportunistic pathogen and the causative agent of many cases of BV, or whether BV is a polymicrobial condition caused by the collective effects of an altered microbial flora. Recent studies of the biofilm-forming potential and cytotoxic activity of G. vaginalis have renewed interest in the virulence potential of this organism. In an effort to tease apart the aetiology of this disorder, we utilized in vitro assays to compare three virulence properties of G. vaginalis relative to other BV-associated anaerobes. We designed a viable assay to analyse bacterial adherence to vaginal epithelial cells, we compared biofilm-producing capacities, and we assessed cytotoxic activity. Of the BV-associated anaerobes tested, only G. vaginalis demonstrated all three virulence properties combined. This study suggests that G. vaginalis is more virulent than other BV-associated anaerobes, and that many of the bacterial species frequently isolated from BV may be relatively avirulent opportunists that colonize the vagina after G. vaginalis has initiated an infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Identification of Bacteria Associated with Bacterial Vaginosis
Fredricks, D. N., Fiedler, T. L., & Marrazzo, J. M. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043802 · Cited by 1,303
Communication among Oral Bacteria
Kolenbrander, P. E., Andersen, R. N., Blehert, D. S., Egland, P. G., Foster, J. S., & Palmer, R. J. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.486-505.2002 · Cited by 1,022
Cited by
Influence of Biofilm Formation by Gardnerella vaginalis and Other Anaerobes on Bacterial Vaginosis
Machado, A., & Cerca, N. (2015) · Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiv338 · Cited by 269
Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities
Redelinghuys, M. J., Geldenhuys, J., Jung, H., & Kock, M. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00354 · Cited by 167
Muzny, C. A., Blanchard, E., Taylor, C. M., Aaron, K. J., Talluri, R., Griswold, M. E., Redden, D. T., Luo, M., Welsh, D. A., Van Der Pol, W. J., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy243 · Cited by 145
Breshears, L. M., Edwards, V. L., Ravel, J., & Peterson, M. L. (2015) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0608-0 · Cited by 140
DNase Inhibits Gardnerella vaginalis Biofilms In Vitro and In Vivo
Hymes, S. R., Randis, T. M., Sun, T. Y., & Ratner, A. J. (2013) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jit047 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Patterson, J. L., Stull-Lane, A., Girerd, P. H., & Jefferson, K. K.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2010-02-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 392-399
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2018420111
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of adherence, biofilm formation and cytotoxicity suggests a greater virulence potential of Gardnerella vaginalis relative to other bacterial-vaginosis-associated anaerobes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.034280-0
- The paper
- Patterson, J. L., Stull-Lane, A., Girerd, P. H., & Jefferson, K. K. (2010). Analysis of adherence, biofilm formation and cytotoxicity suggests a greater virulence potential of Gardnerella vaginalis relative to other bacterial-vaginosis-associated anaerobes. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.034280-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.