Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of real-time PCR with SYBR Green I or 5'-nuclease assays and dot-blot hybridization with rDNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes in quantification of selected faecal bacteria

Malinen, E.·2003·Microbiology

Abstract

PCR primers and hybridization probes were designed for the 16S rRNA genes of six bacterial species or groups typically present in human faeces or used in the dairy industry. The primers and probes were applied for quantification of the target bacterial genomes added in artificial DNA mixtures or faecal DNA preparations, using dot-blot hybridization and real-time PCR with SYBR Green I and TaqMan chemistries. Dot-blot hybridization with (33)P-labelled oligonucleotide probes was shown to detect a 10 % target DNA fraction present in mixed DNA samples. Applicability of the rDNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes without pre-enrichment of the 16S gene pool by PCR was thus limited to the detection of the predominant microbial groups. Real-time PCR was performed using a 96-well format and was therefore feasible for straightforward analysis of large sample amounts. Both chemistries tested could detect and quantify a subpopulation of 0.01 % from the estimated number of total bacterial genomes present in a population sample. The linear range of amplification varied between three and five orders of magnitude for the specific target genome while the efficiency of amplification for the individual PCR assays was between 88.3 and 104 %. Use of a thermally activated polymerase was required with the SYBR Green I chemistry to obtain a similar sensitivity level to the TaqMan chemistry. In comparison to dot-blot hybridization, real-time PCR was easier and faster to perform and also proved to have a superior sensitivity. The results suggest that real-time PCR has a great potential for analysis of the faecal microflora.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/mic.0.25975-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Malinen, E.
Venue
Microbiology
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
149
Issue
1
Pages
269-277
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2138821536
Cited by
323
References
1
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of real-time PCR with SYBR Green I or 5'-nuclease assays and dot-blot hybridization with rDNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes in quantification of selected faecal bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.25975-0
The paper
Malinen, E. (2003). Comparison of real-time PCR with SYBR Green I or 5'-nuclease assays and dot-blot hybridization with rDNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes in quantification of selected faecal bacteria. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.25975-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.