Cited by 762Gut microbiota and healthClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Feces from Healthy Elderly Volunteers and Hospitalized Elderly Patients by Using Real-Time PCR and Effects of Antibiotic Treatment on the Fecal Microbiota

Open access
Bartosch, Sabine, Fite, Alemu, Macfarlane, George T., McMurdo, Marion E. T.·2004·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Fecal bacteria were studied in healthy elderly volunteers (age, 63 to 90 years;n= 35) living in the local community, elderly hospitalized patients (age, 66 to 103;n= 38), and elderly hospitalized patients receiving antibiotic treatment (age, 65 to 100;n= 21). Group- and species-specific primer sets targeting 16S rRNA genes were used to quantitate intestinal bacteria by using DNA extracted from feces and real-time PCR. The principal difference between healthy elderly volunteers and both patient cohorts was a marked reduction in the Bacteroides-Prevotella group following hospitalization. Reductions in bifidobacteria,Desulfovibrio spp.,Clostridium clostridiiforme, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were also found in the hospitalized patients. However, total 16S rRNA gene copy numbers (per gram of wet weight of feces) were generally lower in the stool samples of the two groups of hospitalized patients compared to the number in the stool samples of elderly volunteers living in the community, so the relative abundance (percentage of the group- and species-specific rRNA gene copies in relation to total bacterial rRNA gene copies) of bifidobacteria,Desulfovibrio spp.,C. clostridiiforme, and F. prausnitzii did not change. Antibiotic treatment resulted in further reductions in the numbers of bacteria and their prevalence and, in some patients, complete elimination of certain bacterial communities. Conversely, the numbers of enterobacteria increased in the hospitalized patients who did not receive antibiotics, and due to profound changes in fecal microbiotas during antibiotic treatment, the opportunistic species Enterococcus faecalis proliferated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.70.6.3575-3581.2004

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific microbial taxa are associated with reduced frailty in elderly populations, including Bacteroidetes.

    “Specific microbial taxa are also associated with reduced frailty in elderly populations, including Bacteroidetes”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Bartosch et al., 2004

    The Results report substantially higher Bacteroides–Prevotella counts in healthy community-dwelling elderly volunteers than in hospitalized elderly patients. The Discussion attributes the decrease to hospitalization; the paper does not establish an association between the broader Bacteroidetes phylum and a measured reduction in frailty. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Fite A., G. T. Macfarlane, J. H. Cummings, M. J. Hopkins, S. C. Kong, E. Furrie, S. Macfarlane. 2004. Identification and quantitation of mucosal and faecal desulfovibrios using real-time PCR. Gut 53:523-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [32]Mitsuoka, T., K. Hayakawa, and N. Kimura. 1974. Die Faekalflora bei Menschen II. Mitteilung: Die Zusammensetzung der Bifidobakterienflora der verschiedenen Altersgruppen. Zentbl. Bakteriol. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. A 226:469-478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartosch, S., Fite, A., Macfarlane, G. T., & McMurdo, M. E. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • MRC Microbiology and Gut Biology Group
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2004-06
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
3575-3581
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2109744701
Cited by
762
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 46
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
fecal microbiota, older adults, hospitalized patients, antibiotic therapy, Bifidobacterium, Desulfovibrio, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, 16S rRNA gene quantification, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecalis, intestinal bacteria, community-acquired infections
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Feces, Hospitalization, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Species Specificity, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Ecosystem, DNA Primers, Gene Dosage, Genes, rRNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review