The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emetic toxin formation of Bacillus cereus is restricted to a single evolutionary lineage of closely related strains
Abstract
An in-depth polyphasic approach was applied to study the population structure of the human pathogen Bacillus cereus. To assess the intraspecific biodiversity of this species, which is the causative agent of gastrointestinal diseases, a total of 90 isolates from diverse geographical origin were studied by genetic [M13-PCR, random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), multilocus sequence typing (MLST)] and phenetic [Fourier transform Infrared (FTIR), protein profiling, biochemical assays] methods. The strain set included clinical strains, isolates from food remnants connected to outbreaks, as well as isolates from diverse food environments with a well documented strain history. The phenotypic and genotypic analysis of the compiled panel of strains illustrated a considerable diversity among B. cereus connected to diarrhoeal syndrome and other non-emetic food strains, but a very low diversity among emetic isolates. Using all typing methods, cluster analysis revealed a single, distinct cluster of emetic B. cereus strains. The isolates belonging to this cluster were neither able to degrade starch nor could they ferment salicin; they did not possess the genes encoding haemolysin BL (Hbl) and showed only weak or no haemolysis. In contrast, haemolytic-enterotoxin-producing B. cereus strains showed a high degree of heterogeneity and were scattered over different clusters when different typing methods were applied. These data provide evidence for a clonal population structure of cereulide-producing emetic B. cereus and indicate that emetic strains represent a highly clonal complex within a potentially panmictic or weakly clonal background population structure of the species. It may have originated only recently through acquisition of specific virulence factors such as the cereulide synthetase gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Cited by
(EFSA), E. F. S. A. (2007) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2007.587 · Cited by 479
Ehling-Schulz, M., Guinebretiere, M.-H., Monthán, A., Berge, O., Fricker, M., & Svensson, B. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00320.x · Cited by 274
Self-citationFricker, M., Skånseng, B., Rudi, K., Stessl, B., & Ehling-Schulz, M. (2011) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.08.025 · Cited by 86
Self-citationKowalska, J., Maćkiw, E., Korsak, D., & Postupolski, J. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13203266 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehling-Schulz, M., Svensson, B., Guinebretiere, M.-H., Lindbäck, T., Andersson, M., Schulz, A., Fricker, M., Christiansson, A., Granum, P. E., Märtlbauer, E., Nguyen-The, C., Salkinoja-Salonen, M., & Scherer, S.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-197
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2106428264
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emetic toxin formation of Bacillus cereus is restricted to a single evolutionary lineage of closely related strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.27607-0
- The paper
- Ehling-Schulz, M., Svensson, B., Guinebretiere, M.-H., Lindbäck, T., Andersson, M., Schulz, A., Fricker, M., Christiansson, A., Granum, P. E., Märtlbauer, E., Nguyen-The, C., Salkinoja-Salonen, M., & Scherer, S. (2005). Emetic toxin formation of Bacillus cereus is restricted to a single evolutionary lineage of closely related strains. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27607-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.