Cited by 108Fungal and yeast genetics researchAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and Studies

Functional specificity of Candida albicans Als3p proteins and clade specificity of ALS3 alleles discriminated by the number of copies of the tandem repeat sequence in the central domain

Oh, Soon-Hwan, Cheng, Georgina, Nuessen, Jennifer A., Jajko, Robert, Yeater, Kathleen M., Zhao, Xiaomin, Pujol, Claude, Soll, David R. +1 more·2005·Microbiology

Abstract

Candida albicans strain SC5314 contains two ALS3 alleles, which differ in sequence with respect to the number of copies of the 108 bp tandem repeat sequence within the central domain of the coding region. One allele (ALS3(12)) has 12 tandem repeat copies while the other (ALS3(9)) has 9 copies. Wild-type C. albicans(ALS3(12)/ALS3(9)) and those containing various ALS3 alleles (ALS3(12)/als3 Δ(9),als3 Δ(12)/ALS3(9) and als3 Δ(12)/als3 Δ(9)) were assayed for adhesion to monolayers of cultured vascular endothelial and pharyngeal epithelial cells. These assays showed obvious adhesive function for the larger Als3p protein, compared to a minor contribution to adhesion from the smaller protein. These functional differences in strain SC5314 prompted examination of ALS3 allelic diversity across the five major genetic clades of C. albicans. This analysis focused on the number of copies of the tandem repeat sequence within the central domain of the coding region and showed a range of alleles encoding from 6 to 19 tandem repeat copies. Clades differed with respect to prevalent ALS3 alleles and allele distribution, but were similar for the mean number of tandem repeat copies per ALS3 allele. Analysis of allelic pairing showed clade differences and the tendency for C. albicans strains to encode one longer and one shorter ALS3 allele. The allelic variability observed for ALS3 and its functional consequences observed in strain SC5314 highlight the importance of understanding ALS allelic diversity in order to draw accurate conclusions about Als protein function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/mic.0.27680-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oh, S.-H., Cheng, G., Nuessen, J. A., Jajko, R., Yeater, K. M., Zhao, X., Pujol, C., Soll, D. R., & Hoyer, L. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Microbiology
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
673-681
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2125994797
Cited by
108
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-2392)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE014158, DE 14158)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, tandem repeats, allelic diversity, cell adhesion, SC5314, fungal adhesins
MeSH terms
Alleles, Candida albicans, Cell Adhesion, Cells, Cultured, Endothelium, Vascular, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Pharynx, Umbilical Veins, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Dosage, Tandem Repeat Sequences, Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review