The Predictive Global Neuronal Workspace: A Formal Active Inference Model of Visual Consciousness
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101918 · Paper page
Abstract
The global neuronal workspace (GNW) model has inspired over two decades of hypothesis driven research on the neural basis consciousness. However, recent studies have reported findings that are at odds with empirical predictions of the model. Further, the macro-anatomical focus of current GNW research has limited the specificity of predictions afforded by the model. In this paper we present a neurocomputational model – based on Active Inference – that captures central architectural elements of the GNW and is able to address these limitations. The resulting ‘predictive global workspace’ casts neuronal dynamics as approximating Bayesian inference, allowing precise, testable predictions at both the behavioural and neural levels of description. We report simulations demonstrating the model’s ability to reproduce: 1) the electrophysiological and behaviour results observed in previous studies of inattentional blindness; and 2) the previously introduced four-way taxonomy predicted by the GNW, which describes the relationship between consciousness, attention, and sensory signal strength. We then illustrate how our model can reconcile/explain (apparently) conflicting findings, extend the GNW taxonomy to include the influence of prior expectations, and inspire novel paradigms to test associated behavioural and neural predictions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GNWT has been increasingly described in terms of Bayesian inference, including in a recently proposed Predictive Global Neuronal Workspace model.
“GNWT has been increasingly described in terms of Bayesian inference (Dehaene, 2020; Mashour et al., 2020), including in a recently proposed Predictive Global Neuronal Workspace model (Whyte and Smith, 2020).”
From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Whyte and Smith, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A step-by-step tutorial on active inference and its application to empirical data
Smith, R., Friston, K. J., & Whyte, C. J. (2022) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102632 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationDeeply Felt Affect: The Emergence of Valence in Deep Active Inference
Hesp, C., Smith, R., Parr, T., Allen, M., Friston, K. J., & Ramstead, M. J. D. (2021) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01341 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, R., Badcock, P., & Friston, K. J. (2021) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13138 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictive processing as a systematic basis for identifying the neural correlates of consciousness
Hohwy, J., & Seth, A. (2020) · Philosophy and the Mind Sciences · doi:10.33735/phimisci.2020.ii.64 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Safron, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00030 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The Free Energy Principle: Good Science and Questionable Philosophy in a Grand Unifying Theory
Sánchez-Cañizares, J. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23020238 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Whyte, C. J., & Smith, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Whyte, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-02-12
- Volume
- 199
- Pages
- 101918-101918
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3092295352
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- William K. Warren Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- global neuronal workspace theory, visual awareness, active inference, Bayesian inference, inattentional blindness, attention, prior expectations, neural basis of consciousness, neurocomputational model
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Bayes Theorem, Cognition, Consciousness, Humans, Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review