PreprintCited by 7Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic Landmark-guided Bijective Brain Image Registration by Composing Region-based Locally Diffeomorphic Warpings

Open access
He, Hengda, Razlighi, Qolamreza R.·2020·Human Brain Mapping

Preprint — published as 10.1002/hbm.25865 · Paper page

Abstract

As the size of the neuroimaging cohorts being increased to address key questions in the field of cognitive neuroscience, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, the accuracy of the spatial normalization as an essential pre-processing step becomes extremely important in the neuroimaging processing pipeline. Existing spatial normalization methods have poor accuracy particularly when dealing with the highly convoluted human cerebral cortex and when brain morphology is severely altered (e.g. clinical and aging populations). To address this shortcoming, we propose to implement and evaluate a novel landmark-guided region-based spatial normalization technique that takes advantage of the existing surface-based human brain parcellation to automatically identify and match regional landmarks. To simplify the non-linear whole brain registration, the identified landmarks of each region and their counterparts are registered independently with large diffeomorphic (topology preserving) deformation via geodesic shooting. The regional diffeomorphic warping fields were combined by an inverse distance weighted interpolation technique to have a smooth global warping field for the whole brain. To ensure that the final warping field is diffeomorphic, we used simultaneously forward and reverse maps with certain symmetric constraints to yield bijectivity. We have evaluated our proposed method using both simulated and real (structural and functional) human brain images. Our evaluation shows that our method can enhance structural correspondence up to around 86%, a 67% improvement compared to the existing state-of-the-art method. Such improvement also increases the sensitivity and specificity of the functional imaging studies by about 17%, reducing the required number of subjects and subsequent costs. We conclude that our proposed method can effectively substitute existing substandard spatial normalization methods to deal with the demand of large cohorts and the need for investigating clinical and aging populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.04.16.045609

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.024 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.0503892102 · DOI
  4. M. Zhang et al., “Frequency diffeomorphisms for efficient image registration,” in Proc. IPMI, pp. 559–570, 2017. · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 · DOI
  6. 2019, VoxelMorph: A learning framework for deformable medical image registration, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag, 38, 1788, 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/TMI.2009.2030797 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TMI.2007.901432 · DOI
  10. N. Lepore et al., “A new combined surface and volume registration,” in Proc. SPIE Med. Imag., 2010. · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004426 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/cercor/bhm225 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.019 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80022-4 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2008, Human anatomy, 13, 385
  17. A. A. Joshi , D. W. Shattuck , P. M. Thompson , and R. M. Leahy , “A framework for registration, statistical characterization and classification of cortically constrained functional imaging data,” in Proc. IPMI, pp. 186–196, 2005. · DOI
  18. 10.1093/cercor/bhg087 · DOI
  19. 1989, Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 567, 10.1109/34.24792 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/83.855431 · DOI
  21. M. Vaillant , M. Miller , L. Younes , and A. Trouvé , “Statistics on diffeomorphisms via tangent space representations,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, 2004. · DOI · Paper page
  22. S. Sommer , M. Nielsen , F. Lauze , and X. Pennec , “A multi-scale kernel bundle for LDDMM: Towards sparse deformation description across space and scales,” in Proc. IPMI, pp. 624–635, 2011. · DOI
  23. D. Shepard , “A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data,” Proc. of the 1968 23rd ACM national conf., 1968. · DOI
  24. 10.1006/nimg.1999.0437 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/42.932742 · DOI
  26. D. Kuang , “Cycle-Consistent training for reducing negative Jacobian determinant in deep registration networks,” Simulation and Synthesis in Med. Imag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 120–129, 2019. · DOI
  27. A. Pitiot , G. Malandain , E. Bardinet , and P. M. Thompson , “Piecewise affine registration of biological images,” in Proc. WBIR, pp. 91–101, 2003. · DOI
  28. 2005, Polyrigid and polyaffine transformations: A novel geometrical tool to deal with non-rigid deformations – Application to the registration of histological slices, Med. Image Anal, 9, 507, 10.1016/j.media.2005.04.001 · DOI
  29. B. B. Avants et al., “The Insight ToolKit image registration framework,” Frontiers Neuroinform., vol. 8, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2017, Optimal slice timing correction and its interaction with fMRI parameters and artifacts, Medical Image Analysis, 35, 434, 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 · DOI · Paper page
  32. S. M. Smith et al., “Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, 2004. · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70880-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1212/WNL.49.3.786 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2017, Brain atrophy can introduce age-related differences in BOLD response, Hum. Brain Mapp, 38, 3402, 10.1002/hbm.23597 · DOI
  37. P. Edwards , D. Hill , J. Little , V. Sahni , and D. Hawkes , “Medical Image Registration Incorporating Deformations.,” Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 1995, 1995. · DOI
  38. 1997, Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 66, 223, 10.1006/cviu.1997.0608 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
He, H., & Razlighi, Q. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
He, Hengda
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-04-18
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
3524-3544
ISSN
1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223532917
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K01AG044467, R01AG057962)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
spatial normalization, landmark matching, brain parcellation, inverse distance weighting, cerebral cortex, brain aging, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review