The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic Landmark-guided Bijective Brain Image Registration by Composing Region-based Locally Diffeomorphic Warpings
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/hbm.25865 · Paper page
Abstract
As the size of the neuroimaging cohorts being increased to address key questions in the field of cognitive neuroscience, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, the accuracy of the spatial normalization as an essential pre-processing step becomes extremely important in the neuroimaging processing pipeline. Existing spatial normalization methods have poor accuracy particularly when dealing with the highly convoluted human cerebral cortex and when brain morphology is severely altered (e.g. clinical and aging populations). To address this shortcoming, we propose to implement and evaluate a novel landmark-guided region-based spatial normalization technique that takes advantage of the existing surface-based human brain parcellation to automatically identify and match regional landmarks. To simplify the non-linear whole brain registration, the identified landmarks of each region and their counterparts are registered independently with large diffeomorphic (topology preserving) deformation via geodesic shooting. The regional diffeomorphic warping fields were combined by an inverse distance weighted interpolation technique to have a smooth global warping field for the whole brain. To ensure that the final warping field is diffeomorphic, we used simultaneously forward and reverse maps with certain symmetric constraints to yield bijectivity. We have evaluated our proposed method using both simulated and real (structural and functional) human brain images. Our evaluation shows that our method can enhance structural correspondence up to around 86%, a 67% improvement compared to the existing state-of-the-art method. Such improvement also increases the sensitivity and specificity of the functional imaging studies by about 17%, reducing the required number of subjects and subsequent costs. We conclude that our proposed method can effectively substitute existing substandard spatial normalization methods to deal with the demand of large cohorts and the need for investigating clinical and aging populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration – A deep learning approach
Yang, X., Kwitt, R., Styner, M., & Niethammer, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008 · Cited by 630
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.024 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0503892102 · DOI
- M. Zhang et al., “Frequency diffeomorphisms for efficient image registration,” in Proc. IPMI, pp. 559–570, 2017. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 · DOI
- 2019, VoxelMorph: A learning framework for deformable medical image registration, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag, 38, 1788, 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<272::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TMI.2009.2030797 · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2007.901432 · DOI
- N. Lepore et al., “A new combined surface and volume registration,” in Proc. SPIE Med. Imag., 2010. · DOI
- 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004426 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/bhm225 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80022-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Human anatomy, 13, 385
- A. A. Joshi , D. W. Shattuck , P. M. Thompson , and R. M. Leahy , “A framework for registration, statistical characterization and classification of cortically constrained functional imaging data,” in Proc. IPMI, pp. 186–196, 2005. · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhg087 · DOI
- 1989, Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations, IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 567, 10.1109/34.24792 · DOI
- 10.1109/83.855431 · DOI
- M. Vaillant , M. Miller , L. Younes , and A. Trouvé , “Statistics on diffeomorphisms via tangent space representations,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, 2004. · DOI · Paper page
- S. Sommer , M. Nielsen , F. Lauze , and X. Pennec , “A multi-scale kernel bundle for LDDMM: Towards sparse deformation description across space and scales,” in Proc. IPMI, pp. 624–635, 2011. · DOI
- D. Shepard , “A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data,” Proc. of the 1968 23rd ACM national conf., 1968. · DOI
- 10.1006/nimg.1999.0437 · DOI
- 10.1109/42.932742 · DOI
- D. Kuang , “Cycle-Consistent training for reducing negative Jacobian determinant in deep registration networks,” Simulation and Synthesis in Med. Imag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 120–129, 2019. · DOI
- A. Pitiot , G. Malandain , E. Bardinet , and P. M. Thompson , “Piecewise affine registration of biological images,” in Proc. WBIR, pp. 91–101, 2003. · DOI
- 2005, Polyrigid and polyaffine transformations: A novel geometrical tool to deal with non-rigid deformations – Application to the registration of histological slices, Med. Image Anal, 9, 507, 10.1016/j.media.2005.04.001 · DOI
- B. B. Avants et al., “The Insight ToolKit image registration framework,” Frontiers Neuroinform., vol. 8, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Optimal slice timing correction and its interaction with fMRI parameters and artifacts, Medical Image Analysis, 35, 434, 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 · DOI · Paper page
- S. M. Smith et al., “Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, 2004. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/nimg.2001.0786 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70880-3 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.49.3.786 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Brain atrophy can introduce age-related differences in BOLD response, Hum. Brain Mapp, 38, 3402, 10.1002/hbm.23597 · DOI
- P. Edwards , D. Hill , J. Little , V. Sahni , and D. Hawkes , “Medical Image Registration Incorporating Deformations.,” Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 1995, 1995. · DOI
- 1997, Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 66, 223, 10.1006/cviu.1997.0608 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- He, H., & Razlighi, Q. R.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- He, Hengda
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-04-18
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3524-3544
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9248321
- OpenAlex
- W4223532917
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K01AG044467, R01AG057962)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- spatial normalization, landmark matching, brain parcellation, inverse distance weighting, cerebral cortex, brain aging, neurodegenerative diseases
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review