The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative nascent proteome profiling by dual pulse labeling with O -propargyl-puromycin and stable isotope labeled amino acids
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/jb/mvaa104 · Paper page
Abstract
Summary: Monitoring translational regulation in response to environmental signals is crucial for understanding cellular proteostasis. However, only limited approaches are currently available for quantifying acute changes in protein synthesis induced by stimuli. Recently, a clickable puromycin analog, O -propargyl-puromycin (OPP), was developed and applied to label the C-termini of nascent polypeptide chains (NPCs). Following affinity purification via a click reaction, OPP allows for a proteomic analysis of NPCs. Despite its advantage, the affinity purification of NPCs using magnetic beads or resins inherently suffers from significant non-specific protein binding, which hinders accurate quantification of the nascent proteins. To address this issue, we employed dual pulse labeling of NPCs with both OPP and stable isotope labeled amino acids to distinguish bona fide NPCs from non-specific proteins, thereby enabling the accurate quantitative profiling of NPCs. We applied this method to dissecting the transcription-coupled translation responses and quantified ~3,000 nascent proteins. We found that the translation of a subset of ribosomal proteins (e.g., RPSA, RPLP0) as well as signaling proteins (e.g., BCAR3, EFNA1, DUSP1) was significantly repressed by transcription inhibition. Together, the present method provides an accurate and broadly applicable nascent proteome profiling for many biological applications at the level of translation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 2×
“To test this, we used 304 intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) (20), which computes the relative protein 305 abundance within a sample based on MS signal intensities normalized by the number of 306 theoretically observable peptides per protein.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 2017, New frontiers in translational control of the cancer genome, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 17, 332, 10.1038/nrc.2017.30 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07228 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.019 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2401 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.2356 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0601637103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.mi.25.100171.002415 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.219105.113 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1707514115 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschembio.5b01076 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2557 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1039/b921379a · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01232 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01402-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr101065j · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-31154-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1080 · DOI
- 2019, The jPOST environment: an integrated proteomics data repository and database, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D1218, 10.1093/nar/gky899 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.018 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1505787112 · DOI
- Imami, K. and Yasuda, T. (2019) Measuring Protein Synthesis during Cell Cycle by Azidohomoalanine (AHA) Labeling and Flow Cytometric Analysis. BIO-PROTOCOL, 9. · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1168978 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aal3059 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcp.1040760202 · DOI
- 10.4161/trns.2.3.16172 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Puromycin labeling does not allow protein synthesis to be measured in energy-starved cells, Cell Death Dis, 9, 39, 10.1038/s41419-017-0056-x · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.200904110 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.064 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/269527a0 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.23.16097 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.qai.0000179466.25700.2f · DOI
- 10.1089/ars.2010.3504 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.024 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Uchiyama, J., Ishihama, Y., & Imami, K.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ishihama, Yasushi
- Imami, Koshi
- Venue
- The Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-06-07
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-236
- ISSN
- 0021-924X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3086887537
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Takeda Science Foundation
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20H04844, 17H05667, 20H03241)
- Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (JPMJPR18H2)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
- Keywords
- nascent polypeptide chains, click chemistry, nonspecific protein binding, transcription inhibition, translational regulation, ribosomal proteins, protein synthesis, proteostasis
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, HeLa Cells, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Puromycin, Mass Spectrometry, Protein Biosynthesis, Proteome, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review