PreprintCited by 63

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping genetic effects on cellular phenotypes with “cell villages”

Mitchell, Jana M., Nemesh, James, Ghosh, Sulagna, Handsaker, Robert E., Mello, Curtis J., Meyer, Daniel, Raghunathan, Kavya, de Rivera, Heather, Tegtmeyer, Matt, Hawes, Derek, Neumann, Anna, Nehme, Ralda, Eggan, Kevin, McCarroll, Steven A.·2020

Abstract

Summary: Tens of thousands of genetic variants shape human phenotypes, mostly by unknown cellular mechanisms. Here we describe Census-seq, a way to measure cellular phenotypes in cells from many people simultaneously. Analogous to pooled CRISPR screens but for natural variation, Census-seq associates cellular phenotypes to donors’ genotypes by quantifying the presence of each donor’s DNA in cell “villages” before and after sorting or selection for cellular traits of interest. Census-seq enables population-scale cell-biological phenotyping with low cost and high internal control. We demonstrate Census-seq through investigation of genetic effects on the SMN protein whose deficiency underlies spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Census-seq quantified and mapped effects of many common alleles on SMN protein levels and response to SMN-targeted therapeutics, including a common, cryptic non-responder allele. We provide tools enabling population-scale cell experiments and explain how Census-seq can be used to map genetic effects on diverse cell phenotypes. Abstract Figure: Highlights: Census-seq reveals how inherited genetic variation affects cell phenotypes Genetic analysis of cellular traits in cell villages of >100 donors Characterizing human alleles that shape SMN protein expression and drug responses Development of protocols and software to enable cellular population genetics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.06.29.174383

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 2019, Genome-Wide CRISPR/Cas9 Screening for Identification of Cancer Genes in Cell Lines, Methods Mol Biol, 1907, 125, 10.1007/978-1-4939-8967-6_10 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00007-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.038 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1128/MCB.01262-08 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nrm3584 · DOI
  6. Chen, T. H. 2020. New and Developing Therapies in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: From Genotype to Phenotype to Treatment and Where Do We Stand? Int J Mol Sci, 21. · DOI
  7. 2018, Discovery of Small Molecule Splicing Modulators of Survival Motor Neuron-2 (SMN2) for the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), J Med Chem, 61, 11021, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01291 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nature04244 · DOI
  9. 1998, Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling, Forensic Sci Int, 91, 55, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00175-8 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.017 · DOI
  11. 2003, Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile, Int J Legal Med, 117, 271, 10.1007/s00414-003-0382-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31408-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.029 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/nrneurol.2018.4 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/ng.768 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ng.3200 · DOI
  17. 2018, CRISPR-SURF: discovering regulatory elements by deconvolution of CRISPR tiling screen data, Nat Methods, 15, 992, 10.1038/s41592-018-0225-6 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2003, Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives, Int J Legal Med, 117, 39, 10.1007/s00414-002-0321-z · DOI
  20. 10.1101/gad.1941310 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.014 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nprot.2013.132 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.001 · DOI
  25. 2020, The CIRM iPSC repository, Stem Cell Res, 44, 101671, 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101671 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41586-018-0321-x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6307 · DOI
  28. Mcfarland, J. M. , Paolella, B. R. , Warren, A. , Geiger-Schuller, K. , Shibue, T. , Rothberg, M. , Kuksenko, O. , Jones, A. , Chambers, E. , Dionne, D. , Bender, S. , Wolpin, B. W. , Ghandi, M. , Tirosh, I. , Rozenblatt-Rosen, O. , Roth, J. A. , Tgolub, T. R. , Regev, A. , Aguirre, A. J. , Vazquez, F. & Tsherniak, A. 2019. Multiplexed single-cell profiling of post-perturbation transcriptional responses to define cancer vulnerabilities and therapeutic mechanism of action. bioRxiv. · DOI
  29. 10.1093/hmg/ddn382 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1177 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nature02797 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.066 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.347.6225.938 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.019 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1038/nchembio.1837 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2020, New treatments in spinal muscular atrophy: an overview of currently available data, Expert Opin Pharmacother, 21, 307, 10.1080/14656566.2019.1704732 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nature13595 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1007/978-3-319-89689-2_2 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/science.1136678 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ng2142 · DOI
  41. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000201929.56928.13 · DOI
  42. 2019, The frequency of SMN gene variants lacking exon 7 and 8 is highly population dependent, PLoS One, 14, e0220211, 10.1371/journal.pone.0220211 · DOI
  43. 10.1126/science.1246981 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nbt.3460 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.029 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, J. M., Nemesh, J., Ghosh, S., Handsaker, R. E., Mello, C. J., Meyer, D., Raghunathan, K., de Rivera, H., Tegtmeyer, M., Hawes, D., Neumann, A., Nehme, R., Eggan, K., & McCarroll, S. A.
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-06-29
Cited by
63
References
10
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review