Cited by 506Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations

Open access
Merkle, Florian T., Ghosh, Sulagna, Kamitaki, Nolan, Mitchell, Jana, Avior, Yishai, Mello, Curtis, Kashin, Seva, Mekhoubad, Shila +9 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPS cells) can self-renew indefinitely, making them an attractive source for regenerative therapies. This expansion potential has been linked with the acquisition of large copy number variants that provide mutated cells with a growth advantage in culture. The nature, extent and functional effects of other acquired genome sequence mutations in cultured hPS cells are not known. Here we sequence the protein-coding genes (exomes) of 140 independent human embryonic stem cell (hES cell) lines, including 26 lines prepared for potential clinical use. We then apply computational strategies for identifying mutations present in a subset of cells in each hES cell line. Although such mosaic mutations were generally rare, we identified five unrelated hES cell lines that carried six mutations in the TP53 gene that encodes the tumour suppressor P53. The TP53 mutations we observed are dominant negative and are the mutations most commonly seen in human cancers. We found that the TP53 mutant allelic fraction increased with passage number under standard culture conditions, suggesting that the P53 mutations confer selective advantage. We then mined published RNA sequencing data from 117 hPS cell lines, and observed another nine TP53 mutations, all resulting in coding changes in the DNA-binding domain of P53. In three lines, the allelic fraction exceeded 50%, suggesting additional selective advantage resulting from the loss of heterozygosity at the TP53 locus. As the acquisition and expansion of cancer-associated mutations in hPS cells may go unnoticed during most applications, we suggest that careful genetic characterization of hPS cells and their differentiated derivatives be carried out before clinical use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature22312

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merkle, F. T., Ghosh, S., Kamitaki, N., Mitchell, J., Avior, Y., Mello, C., Kashin, S., Mekhoubad, S., Ilic, D., Charlton, M., Saphier, G., Handsaker, R. E., Genovese, G., Bar, S., Benvenisty, N., McCarroll, S. A., & Eggan, K.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • McCarroll, Steven A.
  • Eggan, Kevin
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-04-26
Volume
545
Issue
7653
Pages
229-233
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2608500349
Cited by
506
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 1
FWCI
22.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (SBF001\1016)
  • Rosetrees Trust (M108-F1)
  • National Institutes of Health (5K99NS08371)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009, MR/P501967/1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL109525)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG006855)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM099117)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K99NS083713)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
human pluripotent stem cells, human embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, TP53 mutation, dominant-negative p53, somatic mosaicism, copy number variation, clonal expansion, tumour suppressor, DNA-binding domain, stem cell culture conditions, exome sequencing, RNA sequencing
MeSH terms
Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Protein Domains, Alleles, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Cell Line, DNA, DNA Mutational Analysis, Genes, Dominant, Humans, Mosaicism, Mutation, Neoplasms, Selection, Genetic, Genes, p53, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Loss of Heterozygosity, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review