Ig-VAE: Generative Modeling of Protein Structure by Direct 3D Coordinate Generation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010271 · Paper page
Abstract
While deep learning models have seen increasing applications in protein science, few have been implemented for protein backbone generation-an important task in structure-based problems such as active site and interface design. We present a new approach to building class-specific backbones, using a variational auto-encoder to directly generate the 3D coordinates of immunoglobulins. Our model is torsion- and distance-aware, learns a high-resolution embedding of the dataset, and generates novel, high-quality structures compatible with existing design tools. We show that the Ig-VAE can be used with Rosetta to create a computational model of a SARS-CoV2-RBD binder via latent space sampling. We further demonstrate that the model's generative prior is a powerful tool for guiding computational protein design, motivating a new paradigm under which backbone design is solved as constrained optimization problem in the latent space of a generative model.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) and variational autoencoders (VAEs) have been used to generate protein backbones for specific fold families.
“Generative adversarial networks (GANs) and variational autoencoders (VAEs) have been used to generate protein backbones for specific fold families (51–53)”
From Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.22.211482 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning
Wang, J., Lisanza, S., Juergens, D., Tischer, D., Watson, J. L., Castro, K. M., Ragotte, R., Saragovi, A., Milles, L. F., Baek, M., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn2100 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Protein sequence design with a learned potential
Anand, N., Eguchi, R., Mathews, I. I., Perez, C. P., Derry, A., Altman, R. B., & Huang, P.-S. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28313-9 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure-based protein design with deep learning
Ovchinnikov, S., & Huang, P.-S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.08.004 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationIn silico proof of principle of machine learning-based antibody design at unconstrained scale
Akbar, R., Robert, P. A., Weber, C. R., Widrich, M., Frank, R., Pavlović, M., Scheffer, L., Chernigovskaya, M., Snapkov, I., Slabodkin, A., et al. (2022) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2022.2031482 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Protein design via deep learning
Ding, W., Nakai, K., & Gong, H. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac102 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Protein sequence‐to‐structure learning: Is this the end(‐to‐end revolution)?
Laine, E., Eismann, S., Elofsson, A., & Grudinin, S. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26235 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eguchi, R. R., Choe, C. A., & Huang, P.-S.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eguchi, Raphael R.
- Choe, Christian A.
- Huang, Po-Ssu
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-08-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1010271-e1010271
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9269947
- OpenAlex
- W4283588088
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Institutes of Health
- Office of Science
- School of Medicine, Stanford University
- Chemistry, Engineering and Medicine for Human Health, Stanford University
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM120007, R01GM147893)
- Advanced Scientific Computing Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- immunoglobulins, variational autoencoder, latent space sampling, protein design, active site design, interface design, Rosetta
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Proteins, RNA, Viral
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review