PreprintCited by 92HER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial proteomic characterization of HER2-positive breast tumors through neoadjuvant therapy predicts response

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s43018-021-00190-z

Abstract

Addition of HER2-targeted agents to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has dramatically improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Still, up to 50% of patients have residual disease following treatment, while others are likely overtreated. Here, we performed multiplex spatial proteomic characterization of 122 samples from 57 HER2-positive breast tumors from the neoadjuvant TRIO-US B07 clinical trial sampled pre-treatment, after 14-21 days of HER2-targeted therapy, and at surgery. We demonstrate that proteomic changes following a single cycle of HER2-targeted therapy aids the identification of tumors that ultimately undergo pCR, outperforming pre-treatment measures or transcriptomic changes. We further developed and validated a classifier that robustly predicts pCR using a single marker, CD45, measured on-treatment, and show that CD45-positive cell counts measured via conventional immunohistochemistry perform comparably. These results demonstrate novel biomarkers to enable the stratification of sensitive tumors early during neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy with implications for tailoring subsequent therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.09.23.20199091

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1126/science.3798106 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2019, Survival outcomes of the NeoALTTO study (BIG 1-06): updated results of a randomised multicenter phase III neoadjuvant clinical trial in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer, Eur J Cancer, 118, 169, 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.038 · DOI
  3. 2016, Association of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Long-Term Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis, JAMA Oncol, 2, 751, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6113 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70320-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70080-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70336-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8027 · DOI
  9. 2017, De-escalation of treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer: Determinants of response and mechanisms of resistance, Breast, 34, S19
  10. 2017, HER2-enriched subtype as a predictor of pathological complete response following trastuzumab and lapatinib without chemotherapy in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (PAMELA): an open-label, single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial, Lancet Oncology, 18, 545, 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30021-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61964-4 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2017, Genomic characterization of HER2-positive breast cancer and response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy-results from the ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) trial, Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 28, 1070, 10.1093/annonc/mdx048 · DOI
  13. 2017, RNA Sequencing to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2 Therapy: A Secondary Analysis of the NeoALTTO Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA Oncol, 3, 227, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3824 · DOI
  14. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0239 · DOI
  15. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3431 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/annonc/mdu112 · DOI
  17. 2018, A predictive model of pathologic response based on tumor cellularity and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CelTIL) in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with chemo-free dual HER2 blockade, Annals of Oncology, 29, 170, 10.1093/annonc/mdx647 · DOI
  18. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2021 · DOI
  19. Fernandez-Martinez, A. , et al. Survival, Pathologic Response, and Genomics in CALGB 40601 (Alliance), a Neoadjuvant Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab With or Without Lapatinib in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol, JCO2001276 (2020). · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2020, Pathologic and molecular responses to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and/or lapatinib from a phase II randomized trial in HER2-positive breast cancer (TRIO-US B07), Nat Commun, 11, 5824, 10.1038/s41467-020-19494-2 · DOI
  22. Toki, M.I. , et al. Validation of novel high-plex protein spatial profiling quantitation based on NanoString’s Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) technology with quantitative fluorescence (QIF). Cancer Research 77(2017). · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41587-020-0472-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8451 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00428-012-1289-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10549-012-2189-z · DOI
  27. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0636 · DOI
  28. Zingoni, A. , et al. Natural Killer Cell Response to Chemotherapy-Stressed Cancer Cells: Role in Tumor Immunosurveillance. Front Immunol 8(2017). · DOI
  29. Metzger, O. , et al. HER2 heterogeneity as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant T-DM1 plus pertuzumab: Results from a prospective clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 37(2019). · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.aaa6204 · DOI
  31. 2020, Geospatial immune variability illuminates differential evolution of lung adenocarcinoma, Nat Med, 26, 1054, 10.1038/s41591-020-0900-x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.039 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Watson, A.B . Perimetric Complexity of Binary Digital Images: Notes on Calculation and Relation to Visual Complexity. Mathematica 14(2012). · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nrc.2016.27 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2016, Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, Clin Adv Hematol Oncol, 14, 520
  36. Sever, R. & Brugge, J.S . Signal transduction in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5(2015). · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030059 · DOI
  38. 2019, HER2-positive breast cancer: new therapeutic frontiers and overcoming resistance, Ther Adv Med Oncol, 11, 1758835919833519
  39. Goutsouliak, K. , et al. Towards personalized treatment for early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2019). · DOI
  40. 2020, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer, N Engl J Med, 382, 610, 10.1056/NEJMoa1914510 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2020, Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer, N Engl J Med, 382, 597, 10.1056/NEJMoa1914609 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2020, Chemotherapy (CT) de-escalation using an FDG-PET/CT (F-PET) and pathological response-adapted strategy in HER2[+] early breast cancer (EBC): PHERGain Trial, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38, 503, 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.503 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1186/1756-0500-2-80 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkv007 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm412 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 2017, Detecting gene signature activation in breast cancer in an absolute, single-patient manner, Breast Cancer Res, 19, 32, 10.1186/s13058-017-0824-7 · DOI
  49. 10.18637/jss.v067.i0 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
McNamara, K. L., Caswell-Jin, J. L., Joshi, R., Ma, Z., Kotler, E., Bean, G. R., Kriner, M., Zhou, Z., Hoang, M., Beechem, J., Zoeller, J., Press, M. F., Slamon, D. J., Hurvitz, S. A., & Curtis, C.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Nanostring Technologies (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Curtis, Christina
Venue
Nature Cancer
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-09-25
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
400-413
ISSN
2662-1347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3155143820
Cited by
92
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01CA182514, F30CA239313)
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA182514, F30CA239313, P30CA015704)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
HER2-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, pathological complete response, HER2-targeted therapy, CD45, predictive biomarkers, treatment response prediction, immunohistochemistry
MeSH terms
Trastuzumab, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review