The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.7 in England: Insights from linking epidemiological and genetic data
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-021-03470-x · Paper page
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7, now designated Variant of Concern 202012/01 (VOC) by Public Health England, originated in the UK in late Summer to early Autumn 2020. We examine epidemiological evidence for this VOC having a transmission advantage from several perspectives. First, whole genome sequence data collected from community-based diagnostic testing provides an indication of changing prevalence of different genetic variants through time. Phylodynamic modelling additionally indicates that genetic diversity of this lineage has changed in a manner consistent with exponential growth. Second, we find that changes in VOC frequency inferred from genetic data correspond closely to changes inferred by S-gene target failures (SGTF) in community-based diagnostic PCR testing. Third, we examine growth trends in SGTF and non-SGTF case numbers at local area level across England, and show that the VOC has higher transmissibility than non-VOC lineages, even if the VOC has a different latent period or generation time. Available SGTF data indicate a shift in the age composition of reported cases, with a larger share of under 20 year olds among reported VOC than non-VOC cases. Fourth, we assess the association of VOC frequency with independent estimates of the overall SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number through time. Finally, we fit a semi-mechanistic model directly to local VOC and non-VOC case incidence to estimate the reproduction numbers over time for each. There is a consensus among all analyses that the VOC has a substantial transmission advantage, with the estimated difference in reproduction numbers between VOC and non-VOC ranging between 0.4 and 0.7, and the ratio of reproduction numbers varying between 1.4 and 1.8. We note that these estimates of transmission advantage apply to a period where high levels of social distancing were in place in England; extrapolation to other transmission contexts therefore requires caution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In particular, the mild restrictions that kept around 0.9 with the original virus strain would keep it around 1.3 (at least) if the new variants increase transmissibility of at least 40–50%, as reported in the literature49–51.”
From Modeling vaccination rollouts, SARS-CoV-2 variants and the requirement for non-pharmaceutical interventions in Italy (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Recently, viral variants of concern have emerged in the UK (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351), and Brazil (P.1) that harbor specific mutations in their S proteins that may be associated with increased transmissibility (50–55).”
From mRNA vaccination boosts cross-variant neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection (2021) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV enter host cells through binding of the S glycoprotein to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)1,28.”
From Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 to mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“and has been reported to increase transmissibility of the B.1.17 variant circulating in the UK.16”
From Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era
Minh, B. Q., Schmidt, H. A., Chernomor, O., Schrempf, D., Woodhams, M. D., von Haeseler, A., & Lanfear, R. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · Cited by 16,873
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013604 · Cited by 12,575
Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G., & Suchard, M. A. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy032 · Cited by 11,159
Self-citationbrms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan
Bürkner, P.-C. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · Cited by 9,476
Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10
Suchard, M. A., Lemey, P., Baele, G., Ayres, D. L., Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2018) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/vey016 · Cited by 3,749
Self-citationEstimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
Flaxman, S. R., Mishra, S., Gandy, A., Unwin, H. J. T., Mellan, T. A., Coupland, H., Whittaker, C., Zhu, H., Berah, T., Eaton, J. W., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7 · Cited by 3,398
Self-citationHastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R. J. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat03141 · Cited by 3,156
Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England
Davies, N. G., Abbott, S., Barnard, R. C., Jarvis, C. I., Kucharski, A. J., Munday, J. D., Pearson, C. A. B., Russell, T. W., Tully, D. C., Washburne, A. D., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.24.20248822 · Cited by 2,557
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–535 of 535
Epidemic Modeling of Multiple Virus Strains: A Case Study of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 In MoscowPreprint
Tseytlin, B., & Makarov, I. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-637885/v1 · Cited by 1
“7 strain has been reported to have a 40% - 90% larger basic reproduction number than the base SARS-CoV-2 [3], [4] and it has spread to 130 countries at the time of writing [2].”
BackgroundUnlocking capacities of viral genomics for the COVID-19 pandemic responsePreprint
Knyazev, S., Chhugani, K., Sarwal, V., Ayyala, R., Singh, H., Karthikeyan, S., Deshpande, D., Comarova, Z., Lu, A., Porozov, Y. B., et al. (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14005 · Cited by 2
COVID-19 vaccination and critical care capacity: Perilous months ahead
Reperant, L. A., & Osterhaus, A. D. M. E. (2021) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.035 · Cited by 2
“7 [8] and others, with hospitals in the front line and economies suffering dramatically.”
An early assessment of the epidemiological effects of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in Germany
Mitze, T., & Rode, J. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.02.16.21251803 · Cited by 1
Impfstoffentwicklung zur Prävention von COVID-19 – Teil 2
Augustin, M., Hallek, M., & Nitschmann, S. (2021) · Der Internist · doi:10.1007/s00108-021-00985-3 · Cited by 1
Emergence of first strains of Sars-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in Romania
Lobiuc, A., Dimian, M., Sturdza, O., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.01.29.21250643 · Cited by 1
Liver Injury in COVID-19 Patients
Balzano, T., Hiba, O. E., del Rey, N. L., Amine, S. E., & Smimih, K. (2021) · Advances in medical diagnosis, treatment, and care (AMDTC) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8225-1.ch009
Afshar, Z. M. (2022) · Eurasian Journal of Pulmonology · doi:10.14744/ejop_82_21 · Cited by 1
“initially detected in the UK, has been reported to have 30%–80% increased transmissibility.[27] The B.”
BackgroundBioinformatic and MD Analysis of N501Y SARS-CoV-2 (UK) Variant
Jukič, M., Kralj, S., Nikitina, N., & Bren, U. (2021) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86582-5_1 · Cited by 1
Lobanova, I. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824409-8.00007-2
“of concern 202012/1) has a significantly higher potential rate of transmission (R0) compared with previous variants [51,52].”
ResultLurie, P. G. (2021) · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.20529/ijme.2021.023 · Cited by 3
SARS-CoV-2 Mutations and their Viral Variants
Coşar, B., KARAGÜLLEOĞLU, Z. Y., ÜNAL, S., İnce, A. T., Uncuoglu, D. B., Tuncer, G., Kilinc, B. R., Ozkan, Y. E., Ozkoc, H. C., Demir, I. N., et al. (2021) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2021.06.001 · Cited by 205
COVID-19 Classification Using Pre-Trained Models and Disease Severity Score Masks
Nehary, E., Rajan, S., & Rossa, C. (2024) · 2024 International Conference on Computing, Internet of Things and Microwave Systems (ICCIMS) · doi:10.1109/iccims61672.2024.10690648
“[6], [7].”
Farsani, M. E., Heidari, F., Ababzadeh, S., & Seyedebrahimi, R. (2023) · International journal of basic science in medicine · doi:10.34172/ijbsm.27631
3D structural prediction, analysis and validation of Sars-Cov-2 protein molecules
de Souza, C., de Oliveira, M. D. L., Bessa, J. A., Mota, K., & de Freitas, R. (2022) · CLEI electronic journal · doi:10.19153/cleiej.25.2.9
de Hoffer, A., Vatani, S., Cot, C., Cacciapaglia, G., Chiusano, M. L., Cimarelli, A., Conventi, F., Giannini, A., Hohenegger, S., & Francesco Sannino, A. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1110029/v1
COVID-19: An Updated Insight of the Pandemic
Satpathy, R., & Rout, P. R. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.99097
B.1.1.7 Variant Outbreak in an Air Force Military Base—Real-World Data
Nitecki, M., Savitsky, B., Akavian, I., Yakhin, A., Narkiss, T., Michael, Y. B., Shapira, S., & Friedensohn, L. (2021) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usab451
Vaccinations or Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions: Safe Reopening of Schools in EnglandPreprint
Cuesta-Lazaro, C., Quera-Bofarull, A., Aylett-Bullock, J., Lawrence, B., Fong, K. J., Icaza-Lizaola, M., Sedgewick, A., Truong, H., Vernon, I., Williams, J. M., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-955495/v1 · Cited by 4
Julin, C. H., Robertson, A. H., Hungnes, O., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.21261478
“Even though increased transmissibility of the Alpha variant has been shown [5-7], knowledge is still sparse regarding how it affects the SAR in households.”
BackgroundSocial risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 acquisition in university students: cross sectional survey
Blakey, E., Reeve, L., Verlander, N., et al. (2021) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268822001698
“7 SARS-CoV-2 variant was transmitting widely in parts of the UK[5].”
BackgroundPasquale, A. D., Radomski, N., Mangone, I., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.05.25.21257370
A Rapid and Consistent Method to Identify SARS-CoV-2 Variants by RT-PCRPreprint
Fabiani, M., Margiotti, K., Sabatino, M., Viola, A., Mesoraca, A., & Giorlandino, C. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-521517/v1
Emergence of the SARS‐CoV‐2 B.1.1.7 variant observed at the Poitiers University Hospital
Hubert, F., Chessa, C., Beby‐Defaux, A., Bourgoin, A., Boinot, L., Noury, U., Larivière, A., Benlaassri, M., Garcia, M., & Lévêque, N. (2021) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.27092
Estimating the strength of selection for new SARS-CoV-2 variants
van Dorp, C. V., Goldberg, E., Hengartner, N., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.29.21254233
“Molecular epidemiology is a powerful framework comprised of a broad collection of methods and software designed to facilitate the analysis of pathogen genetic sequence data [1, 2, 3, 9].”
InfluentialA time series forecasting of the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 N501Y lineage in North America
Quiñónez, E., Vahed, M., Shahraki, A., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.30.21254648
A feasible and more efficient SARS-Cov-2 vaccine allocation to states and counties in the USA
Ives, A., & Bozzuto, C. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.17.21253793
Detection of the new SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.526 with the Spike E484K mutation in South AmericaPreprint
Fernández‐Cadena, J. C., Muñoz, M., Gabriel Morey-León, G., Armas-González, R., Amaya-Márquez, D. J., Sacheri-Viteri, K., Cárdenas, P., Valiente‐Echeverría, F., Soto‐Rifo, R., & Andrade-Molina, D. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-248965/v1
“This mutation was rst identi ed in viral sequences from Brazil and South Africa being related to reinfection cases, an increase in ACE2 binding and, most importantly, it was shown to confer resistance to neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated people (9)(10) Bioinformatic analyses showed that the B.1.526 lineage, rst de…”
BackgroundInfluentialKoopman, J., Simon, C. G., Getz, W., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.01.19.21250114
“…I. Harrison, B. Jackson, C. V. Arianni, O. Boyd, N. J. Loman, J. T. McCrone, S. Goncalves, D. Jorgensen, R. Myers, V. Hill, D. K. Jackson, K. Gaythorpe, N. Groves, J. Silltoe, D. P. Kwiatkowski, S. Flaxman, O. Ratmann, S. Bhatt, S. Hopkins, A. Gamdy, A. Rambaut and N. Ferguson (2020).”
Pokhrel, S., Lee, L., Kraemer, B. R., Samardzic, K., & Mochly‐Rosen, D. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.19.427355 · Cited by 1
“V1, emerged in the United Kingdom at the end of September 2020 and became the dominant variant within a month (7).”
BackgroundResponse to Second Surge, B.1.1.7 variant and UK Policy on COVID-19
Grover, J., Bhala, N. B., & Chakravorty, S. (2020) · The Physician · doi:10.38192/1.6.3.14
Coronaviruses – How Protein Interactions Changed Our Perception Of The World
Bratosiewicz-Wąsik, J., & Wąsik, T. J. (2021) · Advances in microbiology · doi:10.21307/pm-2021.60.2.10
Banerjee, S., Dutta, S., Dhar, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of scientific research · doi:10.37398/jsr.2022.660505
“This variant also possesses 26 Institute of Science, BHU Varanasi, India a deletion mutation at positions 69 and 70 (del69-70) which is resulted in increased transmissibility (Public Health England, 2020; Volz et al. 2021).”
BackgroundMartin, D. P., Weaver, S., Tegally, H., San, E. J., Shank, S. D., Wilkinson, E., Lucaci, A. G., Giandhari, J., Naidoo, S., Pillay, Y., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.02.23.21252268 · Cited by 291
“…(1) that they were better at infecting people that had been previously infected (V2 and V3) (Cele et al., 2021; Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021; Wibmer et al.; Wu et al., 2021) and/or (2) that they were more transmissible (V1, V2 and V3)(Faria et al., 2021; Pearson et al., 2021; Volz et al., 2021).”
Escape of SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 from neutralization by convalescent plasma
Cele, S., Gazy, I., Jackson, L., Hwa, S.-H., Tegally, H., Lustig, G., Giandhari, J., Pillay, S., Wilkinson, E., Naidoo, Y., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.26.21250224 · Cited by 651
“[2] Erik Volz, Swapnil Mishra, Meera Chand, Jeffrey C.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Volz, E., Mishra, S., Chand, M., Barrett, J. C., Johnson, R., Geidelberg, L., Hinsley, W. R., Laydon, D. J., Dabrera, G., O’Toole, Á., Amato, R., Ragonnet-Cronin, M., Harrison, I., Jackson, B., Ariani, C. V., Boyd, O., Loman, N. J., McCrone, J. T., Gonçalves, S., Jorgensen, D., Myers, R., Hill, V., Jackson, D. K., Gaythorpe, K., Groves, N., Sillitoe, J., Kwiatkowski, D. P., The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium, Flaxman, S., Ratmann, O., Bhatt, S., Hopkins, S., Gandy, A., Rambaut, A., & Ferguson, N. M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Public Health England (GB)
- Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Volz, Erik
- Ferguson, Neil M
- ORCID
- Volz, Erik
- Mishra, Swapnil
- Chand, Meera
- Barrett, Jeffrey C.
- Geidelberg, Lily
- Hinsley, Wes R
- Laydon, Daniel J
- Dabrera, Gavin
- Harrison, Ian
- Jackson, Ben
- Ariani, Cristina V.
- Boyd, Olivia
- Loman, Nicholas J
- McCrone, John T
- Gonçalves, Sónia
- Jorgensen, David
- Myers, Richard
- Hill, Verity
- Jackson, David K.
- Gaythorpe, Katy
- Groves, Natalie
- Kwiatkowski, Dominic P.
- Flaxman, Seth
- Ratmann, Oliver
- Bhatt, Samir
- Hopkins, Susan
- Gandy, Axel
- Rambaut, Andrew
- Ferguson, Neil M
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-01-04
- Volume
- 593
- Issue
- 7858
- Pages
- 266-269
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3136588845
- Cited by
- 1,611
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 216 · 2022: 464 · 2021: 685
- FWCI
- 116.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP 1175094, 206194, OPP1197730, MR/R015600/1, OPP1084362)
- Wellcome Trust (MR/R015600/1, 204911/Z/16/Z, Z/17/Z, 206298/Z/17/Z, RDA02, 206298, 206194)
- UK Research and Innovation (MR/V038109/1, MR/R015600/1, MC_PC_19027)
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
- Cancer Research UK (23923)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (PR-OD-1017–20002, MR/R015600/1, RDA02, NIHR301445, OPP1175094, ACF-2018-04-014)
- Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS-CSF4-Torok, SBF004\1080)
- Imperial College London (MR/R015600/1)
- European Commission (725422, MR/R015600/1, 101003653, COVID-19, 206298/Z/17/Z)
- Rural Development Administration
- Novo Nordisk (NNF20OC0059309)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20OC0059309)
- Medical Research Council (MR/R015600/1, MR/M006212/1, MC_PC_19026, MR/V038109/1, MR/S00291X/1, MC_PC_19012, COVID-19)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/V002910/1, EP/V002910/2)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7 lineage, variants of concern, transmissibility, S-gene target failure, time-varying reproduction number, viral genomic surveillance, COVID-19 pandemic, England
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, England, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Phylogeny, Time Factors, Genome, Viral, Age Distribution, Evolution, Molecular, Basic Reproduction Number, Young Adult, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
