PreprintCited by 2,328SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections Studiesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Antibody Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7

Open access
Wang, Pengfei, Nair, Manoj S., Liu, Lihong, Iketani, Sho, Luo, Yang, Guo, Yicheng, Wang, Maple, Yu, Jian +12 more·2021·Nature

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged the globe, and its causative agent, SARS-CoV-2, continues to rage. Prospects of ending this pandemic rest on the development of effective interventions. Single and combination monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics have received emergency use authorization 1–3 , with more in the pipeline 4–7 . Furthermore, multiple vaccine constructs have shown promise 8 , including two with ~95% protective efficacy against COVID-19 9,10 . However, these interventions were directed toward the initial SARS-CoV-2 that emerged in 2019. The recent emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 in the UK 11 and B.1.351 in South Africa 12 is of concern because of their purported ease of transmission and extensive mutations in the spike protein. We now report that B.1.1.7 is refractory to neutralization by most mAbs to the N-terminal domain (NTD) of spike and relatively resistant to a few mAbs to the receptor-binding domain (RBD). It is not more resistant to convalescent plasma or vaccinee sera. Findings on B.1.351 are more worrisome in that this variant is not only refractory to neutralization by most NTD mAbs but also by multiple individual mAbs to the receptor-binding motif on RBD, largely due to an E484K mutation. Moreover, B.1.351 is markedly more resistant to neutralization by convalescent plasma (9.4 fold) and vaccinee sera (10.3-12.4 fold). B.1.351 and emergent variants 13,14 with similar spike mutations present new challenges for mAb therapy and threaten the protective efficacy of current vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.01.25.428137

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutations found in emergent S variants decrease sensitivity to neutralization by mAbs, convalescent plasma, and sera from vaccinated individuals.

    “Mutations found in emergent S variants decrease sensitivity to neutralization by mAbs, convalescent plasma, and sera from vaccinated individuals (27, 37, 58, 61–70).”
  • Reduced sensitivity to vaccine-elicited nAbs has been reported for other B.1.351 variants.

    “Reduced sensitivity to vaccine-elicited nAbs has been reported for other B.1.351 variants (66, 83, 84).”
  • Further mutations in spike protein observed in other novel lineages appear to be driven by escape of the virus from the neutralising activity of public antibodies, indicating that prevention of transmission might be temporary as the virus adapts to natural or vaccine-induced immunity.

    “However, it should be noted that further mutations in spike protein observed in other novel lineages7, 8 appear to be driven by escape of the virus from the neutralising activity of public antibodies,40, 41 indicating that prevention of transmission might be temporary as the virus adapts to natural or vaccine-induced immunity.”
  • Post-vaccination sera derived from volunteers receiving either of the mRNA vaccines showed 6.5- to 8.6-fold reductions in neutralizing capacity to the B.1.351 variant relative to prototype virus in pseudovirus neutralization.

    “post-vaccination sera derived from volunteers receiving either of the mRNA vaccines showed 6.5- to 8.6-fold reductions in neutralizing capacity to the B.1.351 variant relative to prototype virus in pseudovirus neutralization17”
  • The E484K mutation has been reported to abolish or substantially reduce neutralization by multiple potent monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal convalescent sera in both wild-type and pseudo-virus neutralization assays.

    “The E484K mutation has been reported to abolish or substantially reduce neutralization by multiple potent monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal convalescent sera in both wild-type and pseudo-virus neutralization assays.12,13,17,18,22”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Nair, M. S., Liu, L., Iketani, S., Luo, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, M., Yu, J., Zhang, B., Kwong, P. D., Graham, B. S., Mascola, J. R., Chang, J. Y., Yin, M. T., Sobieszczyk, M., Kyratsous, C. A., Shapiro, L., Sheng, Z., Huang, Y., & Ho, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Regeneron (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Yaoxing
  • Ho, David D.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-01-26
Volume
593
Issue
7857
Pages
130-135
ISSN
0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123551159
Cited by
2,328
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 136 · 2023: 301 · 2022: 757 · 2021: 990 · 2020: 7
FWCI
172.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • JPB Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 variants, Beta variant, Alpha variant, antibody resistance, neutralizing antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, spike protein mutations, N-terminal domain, receptor binding domain, convalescent plasma, vaccine efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review