PreprintCited by 32Microbial Natural Products and BiosynthesisMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NPOmix: a machine learning classifier to connect mass spectrometry fragmentation data to biosynthetic gene clusters

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac257

Abstract

Microbial specialized metabolites are an important source of and inspiration for many pharmaceutical, biotechnological products and play key roles in ecological processes. However, most bioactivity-guided isolation and identification methods widely employed in metabolite discovery programs do not explore the full biosynthetic potential of an organism. Untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry is an efficient technique to access metabolites from fractions and even environmental crude extracts. Nevertheless, metabolomics is limited in predicting structures or bioactivities for cryptic metabolites. Linking the biosynthetic potential inferred from (meta)genomics to the specialized metabolome would accelerate drug discovery programs. Here, we present a k -nearest neighbor classifier to systematically connect mass spectrometry fragmentation spectra to their corresponding biosynthetic gene clusters (independent of their chemical compound class). Our pipeline offers an efficient method to link biosynthetic genes to known, analogous, or cryptic metabolites that they encode for, as detected via mass spectrometry from bacterial cultures or environmental microbiomes. Using paired data sets that include validated genes-mass spectral links from the Paired Omics Data Platform, we demonstrate this approach by automatically linking 18 previously known mass spectra to their corresponding previously experimentally validated biosynthetic genes (i.e., via NMR or genetic engineering). Finally, we demonstrated that this new approach is a substantial step towards making in silico (and even de novo ) structure predictions for peptidic metabolites and a glycosylated terpene. Altogether, we conclude that NPOmix minimizes the need for culturing and facilitates specialized metabolite isolation and structure elucidation based on integrative omics mining. Significance: The pace of natural product discovery has remained relatively constant over the last two decades. At the same time, there is an urgent need to find new therapeutics to fight antibiotic-resistant bacteria, cancer, tropical parasites, pathogenic viruses, and other severe diseases. Here, we introduce a new machine learning algorithm that can efficiently connect metabolites to their biosynthetic genes. Our Natural Products Mixed Omics (NPOmix) tool provides access to genomic information for bioactivity, class, (partial) structure, and stereochemistry predictions to prioritize relevant metabolite products and facilitate their structural elucidation. Our approach can be applied to biosynthetic genes from bacteria (used in this study), fungi, algae, and plants where (meta)genomes are paired with corresponding mass fragmentation data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.10.05.463235

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 2022, Compendium of secondary metabolite biosynthetic diversity encoded in bacterial genomes, Nat. Microbiol, 7, 726, 10.1038/s41564-022-01110-2 · DOI
  2. 2022, The Natural Products Atlas 2.0: A database of microbially-derived natural products, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, D1317, 10.1093/nar/gkab941 · DOI
  3. 2021, Advances in decomposing complex metabolite mixtures using substructure-And network-based computational metabolomics approaches, Nat. Prod. Rep, 38, 1967, 10.1039/D1NP00023C · DOI
  4. 10.1038/417141a · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkz310 · DOI
  6. 2019, A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity, Nat. Chem. Biol, 47, W81
  7. 10.1038/nchembio.1659 · DOI
  8. 2015, Molecular Networking and Pattern-Based Genome Mining Improves Discovery of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters and their Products from Salinispora Species, Chem. Biol, 22, 60
  9. 2019, MetaMiner: A Scalable Peptidogenomics Approach for Discovery of Ribosomal Peptide Natural Products with Blind Modifications from Microbial Communities, Cell Syst, 9, 600, 10.1016/j.cels.2019.09.004 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1901493116 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/np500370c · DOI
  12. 2021, Integrating genomics and metabolomics for scalable non-ribosomal peptide discovery, Nat. Commun, 12, 3225, 10.1038/s41467-021-23502-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nbt.3597 · DOI · Paper page
  14. G. Hjörleifsson Eldjárn , et al., Ranking microbial metabolomic and genomic links in the NPLinker framework using complementary scoring functions. PLOS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008920 (2021). · DOI
  15. 2020, Linking genomics and metabolomics to chart specialized metabolic diversity, Chem. Soc. Rev, 49, 3297, 10.1039/D0CS00162G · DOI
  16. O. Kunyavskaya , et al., Nerpa: A Tool for Discovering Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of Bacterial Nonribosomal Peptides. Metabolites. 11(10), 693 (2021). · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nchembio.2188 · DOI
  18. 2020, MIBiG 2.0: A repository for biosynthetic gene clusters of known function, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D454
  19. 2021, A Machine Learning Bioinformatics Method to Predict Biological Activity from Biosynthetic Gene Clusters, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 61, 2560, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01304 · DOI
  20. 2021, A community resource for paired genomic and metabolomic data mining, Nat. Chem. Biol, 17, 363, 10.1038/s41589-020-00724-z · DOI
  21. T. Leão , et al., A Multi-Omics Characterization of the Natural Product Potential of Tropical Filamentous Marine Cyanobacteria. Mar. Drugs 19(1), 20 (2021). · DOI
  22. 10.1128/msystems.00544-20 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/mSystems.00031-18. · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s41596-020-0317-5 · DOI
  25. W. Bittremieux , et al., Universal MS/MS Visualization and Retrieval with the Metabolomics Spectrum Resolver Web Service. bioRxiv (2020). · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.11.007 · DOI
  27. T. Pluskal , S. Castillo , A. Villar-Briones , M. Orešič . MZmine 2: Modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 395 (2010). · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41467-018-06082-8 · DOI
  29. 10.7164/antibiotics.52.13 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/ja.2008.126 · DOI
  31. 2020, A Convolutional Neural Network-Based Approach for the Rapid Annotation of Molecularly Diverse Natural Products, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 142, 4114, 10.1021/jacs.9b13786 · DOI
  32. J. J. R. Louwen , M. H. Medema , J. J. J. Van Der Hooft . Enhanced correlation-based linking of biosynthetic gene clusters to their metabolic products through chemical class matching. Research Square (2022). · DOI
  33. 2020, Systematic classification of unknown metabolites using high-resolution fragmentation mass spectra, Nat. Biotechnol, 39, 462
  34. M. Ernst , et al., Molnetenhancer: Enhanced molecular networks by integrating metabolome mining and annotation tools. Metabolites. 9, 144 (2019). · DOI
  35. 2021, NPClassifier: A Deep Neural Network-Based Structural Classification Tool for Natural Products, J. Nat. Prod, 84, 2795, 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00399 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01391 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41592-019-0344-8 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.1618556114 · DOI
  39. 2017, The antiSMASH database, a comprehensive database of microbial secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters, 45, 555
  40. S. L. Cummings , et al., A novel uncultured heterotrophic bacterial associate of the cyanobacterium Moorea producens JHB. BMC Microbiol. 16(1), 198 (2016). · DOI
  41. 10.1021/np900428h · DOI
  42. 2021, A community resource for paired genomic and metabolomic data mining, Nat. Chem. Biol, 17, 363, 10.1038/s41589-020-00724-z · DOI
  43. 10.1126/science.1193637 · DOI
  44. 2021, BiG-SLiCE: A highly scalable tool maps the diversity of 1.2 million biosynthetic gene clusters, Gigascience, 45, W55
  45. F. Huber , L. Ridder , S. Rogers , J. J. J. van der Hooft , Spec2Vec: Improved mass spectral similarity scoring through learning of structural relationships. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008724 (2020). · DOI
  46. F. Huber , S. van der Burg , J. J. J. van der Hooft , L. Ridder . MS2DeepScore - a novel deep learning similarity measure to compare tandem mass spectra. bioRxiv (2021). · DOI
  47. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Leão, T. F., Wang, M., da Silva, R., Gurevich, A., Bauermeister, A., Gomes, P. W. P., Brejnrod, A., Glukhov, E., Aron, A. T., Louwen, J. J. R., Kim, H. W., Reher, R., Fiore, M. F., van der Hooft, J. J. J., Gerwick, L., Gerwick, W. H., Bandeira, N., & Dorrestein, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • St Petersburg University (RU)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Dongguk University (KR)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • van der Hooft, Justin J.J.
  • Dorrestein, Pieter C.
Venue
PNAS Nexus
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-10-06
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
pgac257-pgac257
ISSN
2752-6542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309976130
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PNAS Nexus (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of California
  • Netherlands eScience Center (eScience grant ASDI.2017.030, ASDI.2017.030, ASDI eScience grant ASDI.2017.030, 2017.030)
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2019/05026-4, 2019/, 17/18922-2)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM118815, R01GM107550)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
biosynthetic gene clusters, microbial natural products, k-nearest neighbors, genome mining, secondary metabolites, untargeted metabolomics, MIBiG, multi-omics integration, environmental microbiome, drug discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review