PreprintCited by 29SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Effect of the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers in healthcare workers

Open access
Romero-Ibarguengoitia, Maria Elena, Rivera-Salinas, Diego, Hernández-Ruíz, Yodira Guadalupe, Armendariz-Vázquez, Ana Gabriela, González-Cantú, Arnulfo, Barco-Flores, Irene Antonieta, González-Facio, Rosalinda, Montelongo-Cruz, Laura Patricia +4 more·2021·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Background: Vaccination is our main strategy to control SARS-CoV-2 infection. Given a decrease in the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers three months following the second BNT162b2 dose, healthcare workers got a third booster dose after six months of completing the original scheme. This study aimed to analyze quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers and safety of the third dose. Material and methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study included healthcare workers who received a third booster dose after six months of the complete BNT162b2 regimen. We assessed the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers 21-28 days after the first and second dose, three months after the complete scheme, 1-7 days following the third dose, and 21-28 days after the boost. Results: The cohort comprised 168 non-immunocompromised participants of 41(10) years old, 67% being women. The third dose was associated with increasing the quantitative antibody titers, regardless of previous SARS-CoV-2 history. In negative SARS-CoV-2 history, the median (IQR) antibody titers increased from 379 (645.4) to 2960 (2010), while in positive SARS-CoV-2 history, from 590 (1262) to 3090 (2080). The third dose had less number of total side effects compared to the other two shots. The most common side effect after the third BNT162b2 shot was pain at the injection site (n=82, 84.5%), followed by tiredness (n=45, 46.4%), with a mild severity (n=36, 37.1%). Tiredness, myalgias, arthralgias, fever, and adenopathy were proportionally higher following the third dose than the two-dose regimen (p<0.05). Conclusion: The third dose applied after six months of the original BNT162b2 regimen provided a good humoral immune response by elevating the quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibody titers. The booster dose was well tolerated with no severe side effects after the additional BNT162b2 dose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.10.20.21265269

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from clinical trials with over 5,000 people who had received BioNTech/Pfizer booster injections showed that protection conferred by the vaccine was 95.6%.

    “However, results from clinical trials with over 5,000 people who had received BioNTech/Pfizer booster injections showed that protection conferred by the vaccine was 95.6%.392–394”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [394]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Tré-Hardy M, Cupaiolo R, Wilmet A, Antoine-Moussiaux T, Della Vecchia A, Horeanga A, et al. Six-month interim analysis of ongoing immunogenicity surveillance of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in healthcare workers: A third dose is expected. Journal of Infection [Internet]. 2021 Aug 23 [cited 2021 Oct 9]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445321004333

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romero-Ibarguengoitia, M. E., Rivera-Salinas, D., Hernández-Ruíz, Y. G., Armendariz-Vázquez, A. G., González-Cantú, A., Barco-Flores, I. A., González-Facio, R., Montelongo-Cruz, L. P., Del Rio-Parra, G. F., Garza-Herrera, M. R., Leal-Meléndez, J. A., & Sanz-Sánchez, M. Á.
Affiliations
University of Monterrey (MX)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
e0263942-e0263942
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214849839
Cited by
29
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
healthcare workers, vaccine safety, vaccine adverse events, antibody response, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccination, injection site pain, fatigue, myalgia, joint pain, fever
MeSH terms
COVID-19, BNT162 Vaccine, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunization, Secondary, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review