PreprintCited by 17Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchChromosomal and Genetic Variations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling chromatin state from sequence across angiosperms using recurrent convolutional neural networks

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/tpg2.20249

Abstract

Accessible chromatin regions are critical components of gene regulation but modeling them directly from sequence remains challenging, especially within plants, whose mechanisms of chromatin remodeling are less understood than in animals. We trained an existing deep learning architecture, DanQ, on leaf ATAC-seq data from 12 angiosperm species to predict the chromatin accessibility of sequence windows within and across species. We also trained DanQ on DNA methylation data from 10 angiosperms, because unmethylated regions have been shown to overlap significantly with accessible chromatin regions in some plants. The across-species models have comparable or even superior performance to a model trained within species, suggesting strong conservation of chromatin mechanisms across angiosperms. Testing a maize held out model on a multi-tissue scATAC panel revealed our models are best at predicting constitutively-accessible chromatin regions, with diminishing performance as cell-type specificity increases. Using a combination of interpretation methods, we ranked JASPAR motifs by their importance to each model and saw that the TCP and AP2/ ERF transcription factor families consistently ranked highly. We embedded the top three JASPAR motifs for each model at all possible positions on both strands in our sequence window and observed position- and strand-specific patterns in their importance to the model. With our cross-species “a2z” model it is now feasible to predict the chromatin accessibility and methylation landscape of any angiosperm genome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.11.468292

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.06.006 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.013 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.05.010 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.2010250117 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1814551116 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107663 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1101/2021.04.07.438649 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nmeth.3547 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/nar/gkw226 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008050 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s41467-020-18832-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41477-019-0548-z · DOI
  14. 10.3389/fpls.2021.701406 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41477-018-0199-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/2020.01.07.898056 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006484 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nrg3682 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41588-021-00782-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1101/2020.07.28.224485 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.014 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/gr.192294.115 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkz1001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008925 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.10.003 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.040 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1440-169x.2011.01309.x · DOI
  28. 10.1109/iccvw.2019.00510 · DOI
  29. 10.1534/genetics.112.143370 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1232542 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/nature24300 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-020-20883-w · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.molp.2021.03.004 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41477-020-0715-2 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.016 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.0810206106 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/mp/ssr002 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.038 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/gbe/evq032 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41592-021-01252-x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkr1090 · DOI
  43. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00046 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/ng.3008 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nature08670 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nature08747 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/gkl976 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41587-020-0681-2 · DOI
  49. 10.1126/science.1128691 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/tpj.13781 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nature22971 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nature22043 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1038/s41467-017-01064-8 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature06148 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/42755 · DOI
  56. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001091 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · DOI
  58. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-232 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1101/gr.176552.114 · DOI
  62. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067863 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.7287/peerj.preprints.970v1 · DOI
  66. Fabian Pedregosa , Gaël Varoquaux , Alexandre Gramfort , Vincent Michel , Bertrand Thirion , Olivier Grisel , Mathieu Blondel , Peter Prettenhofer , Ron Weiss , Vincent Dubourg , … Édouard Duchesnay Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python Journal of Machine Learning Research (2011) https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html
  67. 10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr539 · DOI
  69. 10.1186/1471-2105-13-209 · DOI
  70. Avanti Shrikumar , Katherine Tian , Žiga Avsec , Anna Shcherbina , Abhimanyu Banerjee , Mahfuza Sharmin , Surag Nair , Anshul Kundaje Technical Note on Transcription Factor Motif Discovery from Importance Scores (TF-MoDISco) version 0.5.6.5 arXiv (2020-05-01) https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00416 · arXiv
  71. 10.13140/2.1.4453.2009 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wrightsman, T., Marand, A. P., Crisp, P. A., Springer, N. M., & Buckler, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Wrightsman, Travis
Venue
The Plant Genome
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-13
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
e20249-e20249
ISSN
1940-3372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289840020
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Plant Genome (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1934384, 1650441, DGE-165-0441, 1905869)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Agricultural Research Service
  • Division of Integrative Organismal Systems
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, flowering plants, recurrent convolutional neural network, TCP transcription factors, AP2/ERF transcription factors, maize leaf, cell type specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatin, Zea mays, Transcription Factors, Neural Networks, Computer, Genome, Magnoliopsida

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review