The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling chromatin state from sequence across angiosperms using recurrent convolutional neural networks
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/tpg2.20249
Abstract
Accessible chromatin regions are critical components of gene regulation but modeling them directly from sequence remains challenging, especially within plants, whose mechanisms of chromatin remodeling are less understood than in animals. We trained an existing deep learning architecture, DanQ, on leaf ATAC-seq data from 12 angiosperm species to predict the chromatin accessibility of sequence windows within and across species. We also trained DanQ on DNA methylation data from 10 angiosperms, because unmethylated regions have been shown to overlap significantly with accessible chromatin regions in some plants. The across-species models have comparable or even superior performance to a model trained within species, suggesting strong conservation of chromatin mechanisms across angiosperms. Testing a maize held out model on a multi-tissue scATAC panel revealed our models are best at predicting constitutively-accessible chromatin regions, with diminishing performance as cell-type specificity increases. Using a combination of interpretation methods, we ranked JASPAR motifs by their importance to each model and saw that the TCP and AP2/ ERF transcription factor families consistently ranked highly. We embedded the top three JASPAR motifs for each model at all possible positions on both strands in our sequence window and observed position- and strand-specific patterns in their importance to the model. With our cross-species “a2z” model it is now feasible to predict the chromatin accessibility and methylation landscape of any angiosperm genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2016.05.010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2010250117 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1814551116 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107663 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.04.07.438649 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3547 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw226 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008050 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-020-18832-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41477-019-0548-z · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2021.701406 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41477-018-0199-5 · DOI
- 10.1101/2020.01.07.898056 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006484 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg3682 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41588-021-00782-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2020.07.28.224485 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.192294.115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkz1001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008925 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1440-169x.2011.01309.x · DOI
- 10.1109/iccvw.2019.00510 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.112.143370 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1232542 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature24300 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-20883-w · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molp.2021.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41477-020-0715-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.03.016 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0810206106 · DOI
- 10.1093/mp/ssr002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.038 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evq032 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01252-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1090 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2013.00046 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3008 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08670 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08747 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkl976 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0681-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1128691 · DOI
- 10.1111/tpj.13781 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22971 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature22043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-017-01064-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06148 · DOI
- 10.1038/42755 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001091 · DOI
- 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 · DOI
- 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-232 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.176552.114 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0067863 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7287/peerj.preprints.970v1 · DOI
- Fabian Pedregosa , Gaël Varoquaux , Alexandre Gramfort , Vincent Michel , Bertrand Thirion , Olivier Grisel , Mathieu Blondel , Peter Prettenhofer , Ron Weiss , Vincent Dubourg , … Édouard Duchesnay Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python Journal of Machine Learning Research (2011) https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v12/pedregosa11a.html
- 10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr539 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-209 · DOI
- Avanti Shrikumar , Katherine Tian , Žiga Avsec , Anna Shcherbina , Abhimanyu Banerjee , Mahfuza Sharmin , Surag Nair , Anshul Kundaje Technical Note on Transcription Factor Motif Discovery from Importance Scores (TF-MoDISco) version 0.5.6.5 arXiv (2020-05-01) https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00416 · arXiv
- 10.13140/2.1.4453.2009 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Wrightsman, T., Marand, A. P., Crisp, P. A., Springer, N. M., & Buckler, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wrightsman, Travis
- Venue
- The Plant Genome
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-11-13
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e20249-e20249
- ISSN
- 1940-3372 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12807023
- OpenAlex
- W4289840020
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Plant Genome (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1934384, 1650441, DGE-165-0441, 1905869)
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Agricultural Research Service
- Division of Integrative Organismal Systems
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, flowering plants, recurrent convolutional neural network, TCP transcription factors, AP2/ERF transcription factors, maize leaf, cell type specificity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chromatin, Zea mays, Transcription Factors, Neural Networks, Computer, Genome, Magnoliopsida
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review