The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Peptide-Protein Docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using Forced Sampling
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3389/fbinf.2022.959160 · Paper page
Abstract
Protein interactions are key in vital biological process. In many cases, particularly often in regulation, this interaction is between a protein and a shorter peptide fragment. Such peptides are often part of larger disordered regions of other proteins. The flexible nature of peptides enable rapid, yet specific, regulation of important functions in the cell, such as the cell life-cycle. Because of this, understanding the molecular details of these interactions are crucial to understand and alter their function, and many specialized computational methods have been developed to study them. The recent release of AlphaFold and AlphaFold-Multimer has caused a leap in accuracy for computational modeling of proteins. In this study, the ability of AlphaFold to predict which peptides and proteins interact as well as its accuracy in modeling the resulting interaction complexes are benchmarked against established methods in the fields of peptide-protein interaction prediction and modeling. We find that AlphaFold-Multimer consistently produces predicted interaction complexes with a median DockQ of 0.47 for all 112 complexes investigated. Additionally, it can be used to separate interacting from non-interacting pairs of peptides and proteins with ROC-AUC and PR-AUC of 0.78 and 0.61, respectively, best among the method benchmarked. However, the most interestingly result is the possibility to improve AlphaFold by enabling dropout at inference to sample a wider part of the conformational space. This improves the median DockQ from 0.47 to 0.56 for rank 1 and the median best DockQ improves from 0.58 to 0.72. This scheme of generating more structures with AlphaFold should be generally useful for many application involving multiple states, flexible regions and disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 2017, High-resolution global peptide-protein docking using fragments-based PIPER-FlexPepDock, PLoS computational biology, 13, e1005905, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005905 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- Bryant, P. , Pozzati, G. , and Elofsson, A. (2021). Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2. bioRxiv, page 2021.09.15.460468. · DOI · Paper page
- Davis, J. and Goadrich, M. (2006). The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pages 233–240. · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, R. , O’Neill, M. , Pritzel, A. , Antropova, N. , Senior, A. , Green, T. , Žídek, A. , Bates, R. , Blackwell, S. , Yim, J. , Ronneberger, O. , Bodenstein, S. , Zielinski, M. , Bridgland, A. , Potapenko, A. , Cowie, A. , Tunyasuvunakool, K. , Jain, R. , Clancy, E. , Kohli, P. , Jumper, J. , and Hassabis, D. (2021). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv, page 2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- Gal, Y. and Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In international conference on machine learning, pages 1050–1059. PMLR.
- 10.1093/nar/gkn159 · DOI
- Johansson-Åkhe, I. , Mirabello, C. , and Wallner, B. (2020). InterPep2: Global Peptide-Protein Docking using Interaction Surface Templates. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). · DOI
- 2021, Interpeprank: Assessment of docked peptide conformations by a deep graph network, Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 1, 60
- Ko, J. and Lee, J. (2021). Can AlphaFold2 predict protein-peptide complex structures accurately? bioRxiv, page 2021.07.27.453972. · DOI · Paper page
- Lakshminarayanan, B. , Pritzel, A. , and Blundell, C. (2017). Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
- 2019, A comprehensive review on current advances in peptide drug development and design, International journal of molecular sciences, 20, 2383, 10.3390/ijms20102383 · DOI
- 2021, A deeplearning framework for multi-level peptide–protein interaction prediction, Nature Communications, 12, 5465, 10.1038/s41467-021-25772-4 · DOI
- 2018, Topology independent structural matching discovers novel templates for protein interfaces, Bioinformatics, 34, i787, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty587 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-14-286 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059004 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.004 · DOI
- 2008, A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 72, 270, 10.1002/prot.21920 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0024657 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx216 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0018934 · DOI
- Roney, J. P. and Ovchinnikov, S. (2022). State-of-the-art estimation of protein model accuracy using alphafold. bioRxiv. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · DOI · Paper page
- Schaeffer, R. D. , Liao, Y. , Cheng, H. , and Grishin, N. V. (2017). ECOD: new developments in the evolutionary classification of domains. Nucleic acids research, 45(D1), D296 D302. · DOI
- 2018, Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time, Nature Communications, 9, 2542, 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking, Nature communications, 13, 1
- 2015, Myc and its interactors take shape, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1849, 469, 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.06.002 · DOI
- 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Interpred: A pipeline to identify and model protein-protein interactions, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 85, 1159, 10.1002/prot.25280 · DOI
- 2019, Predicting protein-protein interactions from matrix-based protein sequence using convolution neural network and featureselective rotation forest, Scientific reports, 9, 1
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3270-y · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansson-Åkhe, I., & Wallner, B.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Wallner, Björn
- Venue
- Frontiers in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-11-18
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 959160-959160
- ISSN
- 2673-7647 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9580857
- OpenAlex
- W4297235560
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 11.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Swedish e-Science Research Centre
- National Science Council
- Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning (20:453)
- Linköpings Universitet
- Vetenskapsrådet (2020-03352, 2016-05369)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein-peptide docking, AlphaFold-Multimer, conformational sampling, intrinsically disordered regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review