PreprintCited by 162Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Peptide-Protein Docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using Forced Sampling

Open access
Johansson-Åkhe, Isak, Wallner, Björn·2021·Frontiers in Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.3389/fbinf.2022.959160 · Paper page

Abstract

Protein interactions are key in vital biological process. In many cases, particularly often in regulation, this interaction is between a protein and a shorter peptide fragment. Such peptides are often part of larger disordered regions of other proteins. The flexible nature of peptides enable rapid, yet specific, regulation of important functions in the cell, such as the cell life-cycle. Because of this, understanding the molecular details of these interactions are crucial to understand and alter their function, and many specialized computational methods have been developed to study them. The recent release of AlphaFold and AlphaFold-Multimer has caused a leap in accuracy for computational modeling of proteins. In this study, the ability of AlphaFold to predict which peptides and proteins interact as well as its accuracy in modeling the resulting interaction complexes are benchmarked against established methods in the fields of peptide-protein interaction prediction and modeling. We find that AlphaFold-Multimer consistently produces predicted interaction complexes with a median DockQ of 0.47 for all 112 complexes investigated. Additionally, it can be used to separate interacting from non-interacting pairs of peptides and proteins with ROC-AUC and PR-AUC of 0.78 and 0.61, respectively, best among the method benchmarked. However, the most interestingly result is the possibility to improve AlphaFold by enabling dropout at inference to sample a wider part of the conformational space. This improves the median DockQ from 0.47 to 0.56 for rank 1 and the median best DockQ improves from 0.58 to 0.72. This scheme of generating more structures with AlphaFold should be generally useful for many application involving multiple states, flexible regions and disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.16.468810

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 2017, High-resolution global peptide-protein docking using fragments-based PIPER-FlexPepDock, PLoS computational biology, 13, e1005905, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005905 · DOI
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bryant, P. , Pozzati, G. , and Elofsson, A. (2021). Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2. bioRxiv, page 2021.09.15.460468. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Davis, J. and Goadrich, M. (2006). The relationship between precision-recall and roc curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pages 233–240. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Evans, R. , O’Neill, M. , Pritzel, A. , Antropova, N. , Senior, A. , Green, T. , Žídek, A. , Bates, R. , Blackwell, S. , Yim, J. , Ronneberger, O. , Bodenstein, S. , Zielinski, M. , Bridgland, A. , Potapenko, A. , Cowie, A. , Tunyasuvunakool, K. , Jain, R. , Clancy, E. , Kohli, P. , Jumper, J. , and Hassabis, D. (2021). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv, page 2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gal, Y. and Ghahramani, Z. (2016). Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In international conference on machine learning, pages 1050–1059. PMLR.
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkn159 · DOI
  9. Johansson-Åkhe, I. , Mirabello, C. , and Wallner, B. (2020). InterPep2: Global Peptide-Protein Docking using Interaction Surface Templates. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). · DOI
  10. 2021, Interpeprank: Assessment of docked peptide conformations by a deep graph network, Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 1, 60
  11. Ko, J. and Lee, J. (2021). Can AlphaFold2 predict protein-peptide complex structures accurately? bioRxiv, page 2021.07.27.453972. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lakshminarayanan, B. , Pritzel, A. , and Blundell, C. (2017). Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
  13. 2019, A comprehensive review on current advances in peptide drug development and design, International journal of molecular sciences, 20, 2383, 10.3390/ijms20102383 · DOI
  14. 2021, A deeplearning framework for multi-level peptide–protein interaction prediction, Nature Communications, 12, 5465, 10.1038/s41467-021-25772-4 · DOI
  15. 2018, Topology independent structural matching discovers novel templates for protein interfaces, Bioinformatics, 34, i787, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty587 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-286 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059004 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty593 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.06.004 · DOI
  20. 2008, A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performance, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 72, 270, 10.1002/prot.21920 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024657 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu097 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx216 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018934 · DOI
  25. Roney, J. P. and Ovchinnikov, S. (2022). State-of-the-art estimation of protein model accuracy using alphafold. bioRxiv. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schaeffer, R. D. , Liao, Y. , Cheng, H. , and Grishin, N. V. (2017). ECOD: new developments in the evolutionary classification of domains. Nucleic acids research, 45(D1), D296 D302. · DOI
  28. 2018, Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time, Nature Communications, 9, 2542, 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2022, Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking, Nature communications, 13, 1
  30. 2015, Myc and its interactors take shape, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1849, 469, 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.06.002 · DOI
  31. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2017, Interpred: A pipeline to identify and model protein-protein interactions, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 85, 1159, 10.1002/prot.25280 · DOI
  33. 2019, Predicting protein-protein interactions from matrix-based protein sequence using convolution neural network and featureselective rotation forest, Scientific reports, 9, 1
  34. 10.1186/s12859-019-3270-y · DOI
  35. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Johansson-Åkhe, I., & Wallner, B.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Wallner, Björn
Venue
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-18
Volume
2
Pages
959160-959160
ISSN
2673-7647 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297235560
Cited by
162
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 9
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Swedish e-Science Research Centre
  • National Science Council
  • Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning (20:453)
  • Linköpings Universitet
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2020-03352, 2016-05369)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-peptide docking, AlphaFold-Multimer, conformational sampling, intrinsically disordered regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review