The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid, Reference-Free Human Genotype Imputation with Denoising Autoencoders
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.75600 · Paper page
Abstract
Genotype imputation is a foundational tool for population genetics. Standard statistical imputation approaches rely on the co-location of large whole-genome sequencing-based reference panels, powerful computing environments, and potentially sensitive genetic study data. This results in computational resource and privacy-risk barriers to access to cutting-edge imputation techniques. Moreover, the accuracy of current statistical approaches is known to degrade in regions of low and complex linkage disequilibrium. Artificial neural network-based imputation approaches may overcome these limitations by encoding complex genotype relationships in easily portable inference models. Here we demonstrate an autoencoder-based approach for genotype imputation, using a large, commonly-used reference panel, and spanning the entirety of human chromosome 22. Our autoencoder-based genotype imputation strategy achieved superior imputation accuracy across the allele-frequency spectrum and across genomes of diverse ancestry, while delivering at least 4-fold faster inference run time relative to standard imputation tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1007/s10470-019-01446-6 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.094052.109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13059-019-1837-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv546 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwf113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.020 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.296.5566.261b · DOI
- 10.3390/genes10090652 · DOI
- 10.1093/gigascience/giab016 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021602 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3656 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng.3656 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-2611-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature06258 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, A Deep Learning Method to Impute Missing Values and Compress Genome-ide Polymorphism Data in Rice, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 3, 101
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx243 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008207 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008500 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21765-5 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164242 · DOI · Paper page
- Lin T-Y , Goyal P , Girshick R , He K , Dollár P. 2017. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/tacl_a_00343 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg2796 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3643 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006350 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21975-x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-24308-1_55 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009049 · DOI
- Sarkar E , Chielle E , Gürsoy G , Mazonka O , Gerstein M , Maniatakos M . 2021. Fast and scalable private genotype imputation using machine learning and partially homomorphic encryption. IEEE Access. · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201988 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1155/2018/7068349 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Dias, R., Evans, D., Chen, S.-F., Chen, K.-Y., Chan, L., & Torkamani, A.
- Affiliations
- Scripps Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Torkamani, Ali
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-12-02
- Volume
- 11
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9555874
- OpenAlex
- W4296808098
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- National Institutes of Health (U24TR002306, KL2TR002552, UL1TR002550)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG010881)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- genotype imputation, denoising autoencoder, artificial neural networks, linkage disequilibrium, chromosome 22, allele frequency spectrum, ancestry diversity, inference speed, genetic privacy
- MeSH terms
- Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review