PreprintCited by 16Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid, Reference-Free Human Genotype Imputation with Denoising Autoencoders

Open access
Dias, Raquel, Evans, Doug, Chen, Shang-Fu, Chen, Kai-Yu, Chan, Leslie, Torkamani, Ali·2021·eLife

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.75600 · Paper page

Abstract

Genotype imputation is a foundational tool for population genetics. Standard statistical imputation approaches rely on the co-location of large whole-genome sequencing-based reference panels, powerful computing environments, and potentially sensitive genetic study data. This results in computational resource and privacy-risk barriers to access to cutting-edge imputation techniques. Moreover, the accuracy of current statistical approaches is known to degrade in regions of low and complex linkage disequilibrium. Artificial neural network-based imputation approaches may overcome these limitations by encoding complex genotype relationships in easily portable inference models. Here we demonstrate an autoencoder-based approach for genotype imputation, using a large, commonly-used reference panel, and spanning the entirety of human chromosome 22. Our autoencoder-based genotype imputation strategy achieved superior imputation accuracy across the allele-frequency spectrum and across genomes of diverse ancestry, while delivering at least 4-fold faster inference run time relative to standard imputation tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.12.01.470739

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1007/s10470-019-01446-6 · DOI
  2. 10.1101/gr.094052.109 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1186/s13059-019-1837-6 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv546 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/aje/kwf113 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.020 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.296.5566.261b · DOI
  10. 10.3390/genes10090652 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/gigascience/giab016 · DOI
  12. 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021602 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/ng.3656 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/ng.3656 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1186/s13073-019-0689-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/s12859-019-2611-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature06258 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2021, A Deep Learning Method to Impute Missing Values and Compress Genome-ide Polymorphism Data in Rice, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 3, 101
  20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx243 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008207 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008500 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/s41467-021-21765-5 · DOI
  24. 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164242 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lin T-Y , Goyal P , Girshick R , He K , Dollár P. 2017. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1162/tacl_a_00343 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nrg2796 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ng.3643 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006350 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41467-021-21975-x · DOI
  31. 10.1007/978-3-030-24308-1_55 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009049 · DOI
  33. Sarkar E , Chielle E , Gürsoy G , Mazonka O , Gerstein M , Maniatakos M . 2021. Fast and scalable private genotype imputation using machine learning and partially homomorphic encryption. IEEE Access. · DOI
  34. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201988 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1155/2018/7068349 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Dias, R., Evans, D., Chen, S.-F., Chen, K.-Y., Chan, L., & Torkamani, A.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Torkamani, Ali
Venue
eLife
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-12-02
Volume
11
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296808098
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • National Institutes of Health (U24TR002306, KL2TR002552, UL1TR002550)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG010881)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genotype imputation, denoising autoencoder, artificial neural networks, linkage disequilibrium, chromosome 22, allele frequency spectrum, ancestry diversity, inference speed, genetic privacy
MeSH terms
Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review