PreprintCited by 30Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionElectron Spin Resonance Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.013 · Paper page

Abstract

Conformational changes are an essential component of functional cycles of many proteins such as transporters or receptors. Despite their importance, the characterization of functionally-relevant structural intermediates is often a hard task for both experimental and computational methods. This limitation can be at least partially relieved by integrating experimental data within computational approaches. Such integrative structural biology strategies can yield an ensemble of models consistent with experimental data. While the macromolecular modeling suite Rosetta has been extensively used to predict protein structures de novo using various types of experimental data, an all-purpose conformational change modeling approach has been absent from this suite. Here, we introduce and benchmark ConfChangeMover (CCM), a new Rosetta Mover tailored to model conformational changes in proteins using sparse experimental data. CCM is able to rotate and translate secondary structural elements and modify their backbone dihedral angles in regions of interest. We benchmarked CCM on soluble and membrane proteins with sparse experimental double electron-electron resonance (DEER) restraints and simulated Cα - Cα distance restraints, respectively. In both benchmarks, CCM outperformed state-of-the-art Rosetta methods, showing that it can model a diverse array of conformational changes. In addition, the Rosetta framework allows a wide variety of experimental data to be integrated with CCM, thus extending its capability beyond DEER restraints. Thus, our method will contribute to the biophysical characterization of protein dynamics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.02.14.480383

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrd.2018.180 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/prot.26197 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/prot.26225 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.abm4805 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41467-021-21636-z · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.04.005 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004619 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.10.019 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1520431113 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1323440111 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.101106.101451 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.12.004 · DOI
  17. 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00047 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/0471140864.ps0209s50 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/ja026939x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.str.2018.02.006 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/s41598-020-59121-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1719115115 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.005 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.str.2015.10.025 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/ct300113z · DOI
  28. 10.1529/biophysj.104.058453 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkh468 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/bi990910x · DOI
  31. 10.1021/bi973178f · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00367-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1675 · DOI
  34. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0509 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M311890200 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7514 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90691-C · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90935-D · DOI
  39. 10.1107/S0108768191008418 · DOI
  40. 10.1107/S0907444994013521 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nature03978 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nature10737 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nsmb.2816 · DOI
  44. 10.1126/science.1186303 · DOI
  45. 10.1126/science.1164440 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41467-018-02974-x · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/nature09580 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.1718451115 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nature09795 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.090 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/jp510745d · DOI
  52. 10.1021/jp311723a · DOI
  53. 10.1002/jcc.26032 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/nsmb.1854 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.1410431111 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.011 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn221 · DOI
  59. 10.1002/prot.20817 · DOI
  60. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020161 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1002/jcc.23069 · DOI
  63. 10.7554/eLife.09248 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049242 · DOI
  65. 10.1002/prot.10629 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/pro.2389 · DOI
  67. 10.1137/0916069 · DOI
  68. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1943 · DOI
  69. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 · DOI
  70. 10.1002/prot.25784 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/j.str.2019.08.012 · DOI
  73. 10.1073/pnas.1916375117 · DOI
  74. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127053 · DOI
  75. 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00836 · DOI
  76. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063090 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/nmeth0809-551 · DOI
  78. 10.1110/ps.0242703 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/anie.201810462 · DOI
  80. 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00077 · DOI
  81. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00395 · DOI
  82. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01624 · DOI
  83. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b07529 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Sala, D., del Alamo, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Meiler, Jens
Venue
Structure
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-02-16
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1157-1168.e3
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282935478
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (421152132, SFB 1423)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL122010)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA046138)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM077659, R01GM128087, R01GM080403, R01GM129261)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
Keywords
protein conformational change, Rosetta, sparse experimental data, backbone dihedral angles, membrane proteins, protein dynamics, integrative structural biology
MeSH terms
Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Membrane Proteins, Protein Conformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review