The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.013 · Paper page
Abstract
Conformational changes are an essential component of functional cycles of many proteins such as transporters or receptors. Despite their importance, the characterization of functionally-relevant structural intermediates is often a hard task for both experimental and computational methods. This limitation can be at least partially relieved by integrating experimental data within computational approaches. Such integrative structural biology strategies can yield an ensemble of models consistent with experimental data. While the macromolecular modeling suite Rosetta has been extensively used to predict protein structures de novo using various types of experimental data, an all-purpose conformational change modeling approach has been absent from this suite. Here, we introduce and benchmark ConfChangeMover (CCM), a new Rosetta Mover tailored to model conformational changes in proteins using sparse experimental data. CCM is able to rotate and translate secondary structural elements and modify their backbone dihedral angles in regions of interest. We benchmarked CCM on soluble and membrane proteins with sparse experimental double electron-electron resonance (DEER) restraints and simulated Cα - Cα distance restraints, respectively. In both benchmarks, CCM outperformed state-of-the-art Rosetta methods, showing that it can model a diverse array of conformational changes. In addition, the Rosetta framework allows a wide variety of experimental data to be integrated with CCM, thus extending its capability beyond DEER restraints. Thus, our method will contribute to the biophysical characterization of protein dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 83
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2829-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd.2018.180 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26225 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abm4805 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21636-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004619 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.10.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1520431113 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1323440111 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.101106.101451 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.12.004 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00047 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471140864.ps0209s50 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja026939x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2018.02.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-020-59121-0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1719115115 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2015.10.025 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct300113z · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.104.058453 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh468 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi990910x · DOI
- 10.1021/bi973178f · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00367-1 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1675 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0509 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M311890200 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/17.24.7514 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90691-C · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90935-D · DOI
- 10.1107/S0108768191008418 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444994013521 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03978 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10737 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.2816 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1186303 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1164440 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-02974-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature09580 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1718451115 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09795 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.090 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp510745d · DOI
- 10.1021/jp311723a · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.26032 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsmb.1854 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1410431111 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.011 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn221 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20817 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0020161 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.23069 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.09248 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0049242 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.10629 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.2389 · DOI
- 10.1137/0916069 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1943 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25784 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2019.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1916375117 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0127053 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00836 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0063090 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth0809-551 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.0242703 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201810462 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00077 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00395 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01624 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b07529 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Sala, D., del Alamo, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meiler, Jens
- Venue
- Structure
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-02-16
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1157-1168.e3
- ISSN
- 0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9357069
- OpenAlex
- W4282935478
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Structure (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (421152132, SFB 1423)
- National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL122010)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA046138)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM077659, R01GM128087, R01GM080403, R01GM129261)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
- Keywords
- protein conformational change, Rosetta, sparse experimental data, backbone dihedral angles, membrane proteins, protein dynamics, integrative structural biology
- MeSH terms
- Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Membrane Proteins, Protein Conformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review