PreprintCited by 193Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching

Open access
Chakravarty, Devlina, Porter, Lauren L.·2022·Protein Science

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4353 · Paper page

Abstract

AlphaFold2 has revolutionized protein structure prediction by leveraging sequence information to rapidly model protein folds with atomic-level accuracy. Nevertheless, previous work has shown that these predictions tend to be inaccurate for structurally heterogeneous proteins. To systematically assess factors that contribute to this inaccuracy, we tested AlphaFold2’s performance on 98 fold-switching proteins, which assume at least two distinct-yet-stable secondary and tertiary structures. Topological similarities were quantified between five predicted and two experimentally determined structures of each fold-switching protein. Overall, 94% of AlphaFold2 predictions captured one experimentally determined conformation but not the other. Despite these biased results, AlphaFold2’s estimated confidences were moderate-to-high for 74% of fold-switching residues, a result that contrasts with overall low confidences for intrinsically disordered proteins, which are also structurally heterogeneous. To investigate factors contributing to this disparity, we quantified sequence variation within the multiple sequence alignments used to generate AlphaFold2’s predictions of fold-switching and intrinsically disordered proteins. Unlike intrinsically disordered regions, whose sequence alignments show low conservation, fold-switching regions had conservation rates statistically similar to canonical single-fold proteins. Furthermore, intrinsically disordered regions had systematically lower prediction confidences than either fold-switching or single-fold proteins, regardless of sequence conservation. AlphaFold2’s high prediction confidences for one fold-switching conformation corroborate previous work showing that machine-learning-based structure predictors fail to capture other fundamental biophysical features of proteins such as their folding pathways. Our results emphasize the need to look at protein structure as an ensemble and suggest that systematic examination of fold-switching sequences may reveal propensities for multiple stable secondary and tertiary structures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.03.08.483439

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 2021, The breakthrough in protein structure prediction, Biochem J, 478, 1885, 10.1042/BCJ20200963 · DOI
  2. 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
  3. 2021, Reframing the protein folding problem: Entropy as organizer, Biochemistry, 60, 3753, 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00687 · DOI
  4. 2021, The alphafold database of protein structures: A biologist’s guide, J Mol Biol, 434, 167336
  5. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.1158868 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1800168115 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0709518105 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.06.002 · DOI
  10. 2021, A sequence-based method for predicting extant fold switchers that undergo alpha-helix <--> beta-strand transitions, Biopolymers, 112, e23471, 10.1002/bip.23471 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/prot.20394 · DOI
  13. Quaglia F , Meszaros B , Salladini E , Hatos A , Pancsa R , Chemes LB , Pajkos M , Lazar T , Pena-Diaz S , Santos J et al. 2021. Disprot in 2022: Improved quality and accessibility of protein intrinsic disorder annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/pro.3664 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/molbev/msh194 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Waskom ML . 2021. Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software. 6(60). · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/bi300249u · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.042 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1314045110 · DOI
  25. 2021, Alphafold and the amyloid landscape, J Mol Biol, 433, 167059, 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167059 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2021, Energy landscapes of protein aggregation and conformation switching in intrinsically disordered proteins, J Mol Biol, 433, 167182, 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167182 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nchembio.1694 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.049 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.1260031 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.aag2516 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/molbev/msp277 · DOI
  32. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Outeiral C , Nissley DA , Deane CM . 2022. Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding. Bioinformatics. · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2021, Alphafold2 predicts the inward-facing conformation of the multidrug transporter lmrp, Proteins, 89, 1226, 10.1002/prot.26138 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.str.2020.10.006 · DOI
  36. 10.1159/000488822 · DOI
  37. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2431-08.2008 · DOI
  38. 2020, Sequence-based prediction of metamorphic behavior in proteins, Biophys J, 119, 1380, 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.07.034 · DOI
  39. Kim AK , Looger LL , Porter LL . 2021. A high-throughput predictive method for sequence-similar fold switchers. Biopolymers.e23416. · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.1915948116 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/science.abd8700 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chakravarty, D., & Porter, L. L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Porter, Lauren L.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-03-08
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
e4353-e4353
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281551093
Cited by
193
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 12
FWCI
12.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, structural heterogeneity, intrinsically disordered regions, prediction confidence, sequence conservation, multiple sequence alignment, protein conformational ensembles
MeSH terms
Sequence Alignment, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review