The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4353 · Paper page
Abstract
AlphaFold2 has revolutionized protein structure prediction by leveraging sequence information to rapidly model protein folds with atomic-level accuracy. Nevertheless, previous work has shown that these predictions tend to be inaccurate for structurally heterogeneous proteins. To systematically assess factors that contribute to this inaccuracy, we tested AlphaFold2’s performance on 98 fold-switching proteins, which assume at least two distinct-yet-stable secondary and tertiary structures. Topological similarities were quantified between five predicted and two experimentally determined structures of each fold-switching protein. Overall, 94% of AlphaFold2 predictions captured one experimentally determined conformation but not the other. Despite these biased results, AlphaFold2’s estimated confidences were moderate-to-high for 74% of fold-switching residues, a result that contrasts with overall low confidences for intrinsically disordered proteins, which are also structurally heterogeneous. To investigate factors contributing to this disparity, we quantified sequence variation within the multiple sequence alignments used to generate AlphaFold2’s predictions of fold-switching and intrinsically disordered proteins. Unlike intrinsically disordered regions, whose sequence alignments show low conservation, fold-switching regions had conservation rates statistically similar to canonical single-fold proteins. Furthermore, intrinsically disordered regions had systematically lower prediction confidences than either fold-switching or single-fold proteins, regardless of sequence conservation. AlphaFold2’s high prediction confidences for one fold-switching conformation corroborate previous work showing that machine-learning-based structure predictors fail to capture other fundamental biophysical features of proteins such as their folding pathways. Our results emphasize the need to look at protein structure as an ensemble and suggest that systematic examination of fold-switching sequences may reveal propensities for multiple stable secondary and tertiary structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635
Sampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold2
del Alamo, D., Sala, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75751 · Cited by 511
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 2021, The breakthrough in protein structure prediction, Biochem J, 478, 1885, 10.1042/BCJ20200963 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
- 2021, Reframing the protein folding problem: Entropy as organizer, Biochemistry, 60, 3753, 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00687 · DOI
- 2021, The alphafold database of protein structures: A biologist’s guide, J Mol Biol, 434, 167336
- 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1158868 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1800168115 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0709518105 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.06.002 · DOI
- 2021, A sequence-based method for predicting extant fold switchers that undergo alpha-helix <--> beta-strand transitions, Biopolymers, 112, e23471, 10.1002/bip.23471 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.20394 · DOI
- Quaglia F , Meszaros B , Salladini E , Hatos A , Pancsa R , Chemes LB , Pajkos M , Lazar T , Pena-Diaz S , Santos J et al. 2021. Disprot in 2022: Improved quality and accessibility of protein intrinsic disorder annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3664 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msh194 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- Waskom ML . 2021. Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software. 6(60). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/bi300249u · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.042 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1314045110 · DOI
- 2021, Alphafold and the amyloid landscape, J Mol Biol, 433, 167059, 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167059 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Energy landscapes of protein aggregation and conformation switching in intrinsically disordered proteins, J Mol Biol, 433, 167182, 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167182 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.1694 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.049 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1260031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aag2516 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msp277 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · DOI · Paper page
- Outeiral C , Nissley DA , Deane CM . 2022. Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding. Bioinformatics. · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Alphafold2 predicts the inward-facing conformation of the multidrug transporter lmrp, Proteins, 89, 1226, 10.1002/prot.26138 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.str.2020.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1159/000488822 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2431-08.2008 · DOI
- 2020, Sequence-based prediction of metamorphic behavior in proteins, Biophys J, 119, 1380, 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.07.034 · DOI
- Kim AK , Looger LL , Porter LL . 2021. A high-throughput predictive method for sequence-similar fold switchers. Biopolymers.e23416. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1915948116 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abd8700 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakravarty, D., & Porter, L. L.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Porter, Lauren L.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-03-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e4353-e4353
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9134877
- OpenAlex
- W4281551093
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, structural heterogeneity, intrinsically disordered regions, prediction confidence, sequence conservation, multiple sequence alignment, protein conformational ensembles
- MeSH terms
- Sequence Alignment, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review