PreprintCited by 21Protein Structure and DynamicsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A generic framework for hierarchical de novo protein design

Open access
Harteveld, Zander, Bonet, Jaume, Rosset, Stéphane, Yang, Che, Sesterhenn, Fabian, Correia, Bruno E.·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2206111119 · Paper page

Abstract

De novo protein design enables the exploration of novel sequences and structures absent from the natural protein universe. De novo design also stands as a stringent test to our understanding of the underlying physical principles of protein folding and may lead to the development of proteins with unmatched functional characteristics. The first fundamental challenge of de novo design is to devise “designable” structural templates leading to sequences that will adopt the predicted fold. Here, we built on the TopoBuilder de novo design method to automatically assemble structural templates with native-like features starting from string descriptors that capture the overall topology of proteins. Our framework eliminates the dependency of hand-crafted and fold-specific rules through an iterative, data-driven approach that extracts geometrical parameters from structural tertiary motifs. We evaluated the TopoBuilder framework by designing sequences for a set of five protein folds and experimental characterization revealed that several sequences were folded and stable in solution. The TopoBuilder de novo design framework will be broadly useful to guide the generation of artificial proteins with customized geometries, enabling the exploration of the protein universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.04.07.487481

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1038/nature19946 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/BF01715807 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2146 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.aan0693 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nature23912 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1126/science.1261172 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1257452 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1126/science.aaf8818 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.aad8036 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3341 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.273.5275.666 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3211 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10383 · DOI
  14. 2002, Emergence of highly designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma, 47, 506, 10.1002/prot.10107 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S1093-3263(00)00137-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.08.058 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.218101 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/2021.11.03.467111 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<171::AID-PROT21>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  21. 10.1089/cmb.2015.0209 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature11600 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1101/2021.08.06.455475 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nchembio.1966 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.abc8182 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41586-018-0509-0 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/s41594-018-0141-6 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/2021.12.20.472081 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.1257481 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1006/jsbi.2002.4448 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90301-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.aay5051 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/s41589-020-00699-x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0611678104 · DOI
  35. 10.1042/BJ20090122 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.1085371 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/416657a · DOI
  38. 10.1002/prot.21913 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.012 · DOI
  40. 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.005043 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/285378a0 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/pro.2610 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/2020.04.26.062612 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1101/378976 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nature12966 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006623 · DOI
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024109 · DOI
  49. 10.1186/s12859-019-2796-3 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nature19791 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.2002120117 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41467-021-24050-7 · DOI
  53. 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.3390/biom10020193 · DOI
  58. 10.1073/pnas.1509508112 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Harteveld, Z., Bonet, J., Rosset, S., Yang, C., Sesterhenn, F., & Correia, B. E.
Affiliations
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Correia, Bruno E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-04-08
Volume
119
Issue
43
Pages
e2206111119-e2206111119
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306641699
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Biltema Foundation
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico
  • National Supercomputing Centre Singapore
  • H2020 European Research Council (716058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
de novo protein design, structural templates, protein topology, geometric parameters, protein folding, artificial proteins, protein stability
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review