PreprintCited by 18Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

ADTnorm: Robust Integration of Single-cell Protein Measurement across CITE-seq Datasets

Open access
Zheng, Ye, Caron, Daniel P., Kim, Ju Yeong, Jun, Seong-Hwan, Tian, Yuan, Florian, Mair, Stuart, Kenneth D., Sims, Peter A. +1 more·2022·Nature Communications

Abstract

CITE-seq enables paired measurement of surface protein and mRNA expression in single cells using antibodies conjugated to oligonucleotide tags. Due to the high copy number of surface protein molecules, sequencing antibody-derived tags (ADTs) allows for robust protein detection, improving cell-type identification. However, variability in antibody staining leads to batch effects in the ADT expression, obscuring biological variation, reducing interpretability, and obstructing cross-study analyses. Here, we present ADTnorm ( https://github.com/yezhengSTAT/ADTnorm ), a normalization and integration method designed explicitly for ADT abundance. Benchmarking against 14 existing scaling and normalization methods, we show that ADTnorm accurately aligns populations with negative- and positive-expression of surface protein markers across 13 public datasets, effectively removing technical variation across batches and improving cell-type separation. ADTnorm enables efficient integration of public CITE-seq datasets, each with unique experimental designs, paving the way for atlas-level analyses. Beyond normalization, ADTnorm includes built-in utilities to aid in automated threshold-gating as well as assessment of antibody staining quality for titration optimization and antibody panel selection. Applying ADTnorm to a published COVID-19 CITE-seq dataset allowed for identifying previously undetected disease-associated markers, illustrating a broad utility in biological applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.04.29.489989

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most ADT markers show a bimodal distribution with a negative peak for nonspecific antibody binding and a positive peak resembling enrichment of cell-surface proteins in specific cell types.

    “Most markers exhibit a bimodal distribution with a ‘negative’ (low count) peak for nonspecific antibody binding and a ‘positive’ peak that resembles enrichment of cell-surface proteins in specific cell types160.”

    From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [160]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]Shapiro H.M.: Practical flow cytometry. John Wiley & Sons (2005)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Y., Caron, D. P., Kim, J. Y., Jun, S.-H., Tian, Y., Florian, M., Stuart, K. D., Sims, P. A., & Gottardo, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-05-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
5852-5852
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411882241
Cited by
18
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HG012797)
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Université de Lausanne
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od028685-01, HG012797)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (K99HG012797, R00HG012797)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI106711, U19AI128914, U19AI128949)
  • Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of Health (S10OD028685)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
CITE-seq, surface protein expression, normalization, data integration, batch effects, single-cell proteomics, cell type annotation, antibody titration, COVID-19 pandemic, hematopoietic progenitor cells, multi-omics integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review