PreprintCited by 53Cellular transport and secretionLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sequence analysis and structural predictions of lipid transfer bridges in the repeating beta groove (RBG) superfamily reveals past and present domain variations affecting form, function and interactions of VPS13, ATG2, SHIP164, Hobbit and Tweek

Open access
Levine, Tim P·2022·Contact

Preprint — published as 10.1177/25152564221134328

Abstract

Lipid transfer between organelles requires proteins that shield the hydrophobic portions of lipids as they cross the cytoplasm. In the last decade a new structural form of lipid transfer protein (LTP) has been found: long hydrophobic grooves made of beta-sheet that bridge between organelles at membrane contact sites. Eukaryotes have five families of bridge-like LTPs: VPS13, ATG2, SHIP164, Hobbit and Tweek. These are unified into a single superfamily through their bridges being composed of just one domain, called the repeating beta groove (RBG) domain, which builds into rod shaped multimers with a hydrophobic-lined groove and hydrophilic exterior. Here, sequences and predicted structures of the RBG superfamily were analyzed in depth. Phylogenetics showed that the last eukaryotic common ancestor contained all five RBG proteins, with duplicate VPS13s. These appear to have arisen in even earlier ancestors from shorter forms with 4 RBG domains. The extreme ends of most RBG proteins have amphipathic helices that might be an adaptation for direct or indirect bilayer interaction, although this has yet to be tested. The one exception to this is the C-terminus of SHIP164, which instead has a coiled-coil. Finally, almost the entire length of the exterior surfaces of the RBG bridges are shown to have conserved residues, indicating sites for partner interactions almost all of which are unknown. These findings can inform future cell biological and biochemical experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.07.06.498983

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1083/jcb.202202030 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.064 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1021/bi048296z · DOI
  5. 10.1083/jcb.201804111 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.009 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020114 · DOI
  8. 10.15252/embr.201948412 · DOI
  9. 10.1083/jcb.139.1.23 · DOI
  10. 10.1101/2022.03.12.484089 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkt381 · DOI
  12. 10.1101/2022.03.08.482579 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1101/2021.10.17.464712 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.10.004 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)02046-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/2022.07.27.501698 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/febs.13995 · DOI
  18. 10.1083/jcb.201606078 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/hmg/ddz318 · DOI
  20. 10.3390/ijms22062905 · DOI
  21. 10.3389/fcell.2021.784367 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/tra.12432 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth444 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006325 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/cpbi.108 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn392 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.2101562118 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/biom8030045 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.plipres.2010.02.001 · DOI
  30. 10.1083/jcb.202010004 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/2022.03.30.486314 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00056 · DOI
  33. 10.1083/jcb.202111018 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nature05815 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.15252/embj.2021109998 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.08.007 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41467-019-09617-9 · DOI
  38. 10.1242/dev.090761 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1806727115 · DOI
  40. 10.1083/jcb.201807019 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.02.008 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/cmi.12722 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.159003 · DOI
  44. 10.14348/molcells.2014.2245 · DOI
  45. 10.1083/jcb.202001161 · DOI
  46. 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.7554/eLife.45777 · DOI
  48. 10.1242/jcs.259357 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41559-022-01733-y · DOI
  50. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1007/s40262-013-0071-8 · DOI
  52. 10.1242/jcs.259086 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.tcb.2022.03.011 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.158956 · DOI
  55. 10.1083/jcb.202009194 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41594-019-0203-4 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/pro.3623 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0955-0674(90)90107-P · DOI
  59. 10.1091/mbc.E19-08-0439-T · DOI
  60. 10.1002/pro.4192 · DOI
  61. 10.1105/tpc.104.026740 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/s41580-019-0180-9 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1038/s41467-020-16523-y · DOI
  65. 10.1111/tra.12523 · DOI
  66. 10.1083/jcb.202104073 · DOI
  67. 10.1126/science.aar1886 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1038/ncomms3325 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.045 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/emboj/cdg324 · DOI
  73. 10.1083/jcb.202111095 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.027 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1083/jcb.201811139 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.04.012 · DOI
  77. 10.1091/mbc.E11-09-0785 · DOI
  78. 10.1101/2020.05.12.090977 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1126/science.8502994 · DOI
  81. 10.1073/pnas.1815547116 · DOI
  82. 10.1177/25152564221096024 · DOI
  83. 10.1038/s41598-022-13717-w · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Levine, T. P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Levine, Tim P
Venue
Contact
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-07-07
Volume
5
Pages
251525642211343-251525642211343
ISSN
2515-2564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312210016
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Contact (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P003818/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
lipid transfer proteins, membrane contact sites, Vps13, ATG2, hobbits, tweeks, phylogenetics, amphipathic helix, coiled coil, protein structure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review