PreprintCited by 41Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesIon Channels and ReceptorsBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antagonistic interactions between odorants alter human odor perception

Open access
Fukutani, Yosuke, Abe, Masashi, Saito, Haruka, Eguchi, Ryo, Tazawa, Toshiaki, de March, Claire A., Yohda, Masafumi, Matsunami, Hiroaki·2022·Current Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.072 · Paper page

Abstract

The olfactory system detects a vast number of odorants using hundreds of olfactory receptors (ORs), the largest group of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. Each OR is activated by specific odorous ligands. Like other GPCRs, activation of ORs may be blocked through antagonism. Recent reports highlight widespread antagonisms in odor mixtures influencing olfactory neuron activities. However, it is unclear if and how these antagonisms influence perception of odor mixtures. Here we show that odorant antagonisms at the receptor level alter odor perception. Using a large-scale heterologous expression, we first identified a set of human ORs that are activated by methanethiol and hydrogen sulfide, two extremely potent volatile sulfur malodors. We then screened odorants that block activation of these ORs and identified a set of antagonists, including β-ionone. Finally, human sensory evaluation revealed that odor intensity and unpleasantness of methanethiol were decreased by β-ionone. Odor intensity of β-ionone itself is not correlated with the degree of suppression of malodor sensation. Suppression was also not observed when methanethiol and β-ionone were simultaneously introduced to different nostrils. Together, our data supports the model that odor sensation is altered through antagonistic interactions at the level of the ORs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.02.502184

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-X · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1101/gr.169532.113 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002821 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0307882100 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.1804106115 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.006 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.001 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/scisignal.2000016 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1282-11.2011 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1605973113 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41467-018-06806-w · DOI
  12. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600032 · DOI
  13. 10.1039/C8OB00205C · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1813230116 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.aaz5390 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107814 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.086 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.mcn.2020.103469 · DOI
  19. 10.1085/jgp.201010528 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/chemse/bjp044 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.034 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ab.2016.03.006 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/chemse/1.3.339 · DOI
  24. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00504 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.8016645 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0144704 · DOI
  27. 10.3791/59446 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/jacs.6b06983 · DOI
  29. 10.1039/C7NP00016B · DOI
  30. 10.1093/chemse/bjy022 · DOI
  31. 2001, Fragrance chemistry - Milestones and perspectives, Chimia, 55, 379, 10.2533/chimia.2001.379 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/anie.202005719 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1111297109 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00018-019-03279-y · DOI
  35. 10.1021/jacs.5b04659 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.2004642117 · DOI
  37. 10.7554/eLife.34958 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41467-020-17124-5 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/chemse/bjn022 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nature06162 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nn.3598 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/chemse/bjs049 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030 · DOI
  44. 10.1101/2021.07.28.454120 · DOI
  45. 10.1101/2021.12.27.474279 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/gbb.12439 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00047.x · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.031 · DOI
  49. 10.1074/jbc.M700386200 · DOI
  50. 10.1074/jbc.RA118.007110 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.021 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/nar/gkaa971 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/prot.340080302 · DOI
  56. 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/jcc.21334 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fukutani, Y., Abe, M., Saito, H., Eguchi, R., Tazawa, T., de March, C. A., Yohda, M., & Matsunami, H.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Global Innovation Research (Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology) (JP)
  • Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology (JP)
  • S.T. Corporation (Japan) (JP)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fukutani, Yosuke
  • Yohda, Masafumi
  • Matsunami, Hiroaki
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-03
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
2235-2245.e4
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4377292694
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1555919)
  • Kao Corporation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dc016224-05, DC016224)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20H02532, 18K14060, JPMJAX201C, JPMJOP183, JPMJOP1833, 20K15745)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01-DC016224, K99DC018333, R01DC014423)
  • Program on Open Innovation Platform with Enterprises, Research Institute and Academia (JPMJOP1833)
  • ACT-X (JPMJAX201C)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
olfactory receptors, olfaction, odor mixtures, methanethiol, hydrogen sulfide, β-ionone, volatile sulfur compounds, odor intensity, G protein-coupled receptors, heterologous expression
MeSH terms
Humans, Odorants, Perception, Smell, Sulfhydryl Compounds, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Receptors, Odorant, Norisoprenoids, Olfactory Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review