PreprintCited by 7Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of RNA Polymerase II Trigger Loop Mutations using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Machine Learning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010999 · Paper page

Abstract

Catalysis and fidelity of multisubunit RNA polymerases rely on a highly conserved active site domain called the trigger loop (TL), which achieves roles in transcription through conformational changes and interaction with NTP substrates. The mutations of TL residues cause distinct effects on catalysis including hypo- and hyperactivity and altered fidelity. We applied molecular dynamics simulation (MD) and machine learning (ML) techniques to characterize TL mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) system. We did so to determine relationships between individual mutations and phenotypes and to associate phenotypes with MD simulated structural alterations. Using fitness values of mutants under various stress conditions, we modeled phenotypes along a spectrum of continual values. We found that ML could predict the phenotypes with 0.68 R 2 correlation from amino acid sequences alone. It was more difficult to incorporate MD data to improve predictions from machine learning, presumably because MD data is too noisy and possibly incomplete to directly infer functional phenotypes. However, a variational auto-encoder model based on the MD data allowed the clustering of mutants with different phenotypes based on structural details. Overall, we found that lethal mutations tended to increase distances of TL residues to the NTP substrate, while viable loss-of-function (LOF) substitutions tended to confer an increase in distances between TL and bridge helix (BH). In contrast, GOF mutants generally have a disrupting effect on hydrophobic contacts among TL and nearby helices. AUTHOR SUMMARY: RNA polymerase II (Pol II) synthesizes RNA with the help of an active site domain called trigger loop (TL). The mutations of TL cause changes in the activity of Pol II that could range from gain-of function (GOF) to loss-of-function (LOF) or lethal. This study provides a systematic characterization of the structural and functional outcomes of the TL mutations using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and machine learning (ML). We obtained functional phenotypes of mutants by ML using the genetic fitness scores as the input. We revealed that mutant TL sequences could predict the functional outcomes at a relatively high correlation. Then, we performed MD simulations to relate the structural information to the phenotypes. The analysis of the MD data suggested that the lethal mutants had increased distances between the TL and the substrate, while a subset of LOF mutants showed increased distances between TL and another active site domain called bridge helix (BH). On the other hand, GOF mutants had effects on the hydrophobic interactions around the active site. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of the effects of TL mutations to the Pol II function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.11.503690

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1126/science.1059493 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1059495 · DOI
  3. 2013, Basic mechanisms of RNA polymerase II activity and alteration of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bba-Gene Regul Mech, 1829, 39
  4. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.023 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.010 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.01.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/cr400046x · DOI
  8. 2016, Elucidation of the Dynamics of Transcription Elongation by RNA Polymerase II using Kinetic Network Models, Accounts Chem Res, 49, 687, 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00536 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.0704138104 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/nar/gks383 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nature05931 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.060 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1920427117 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.006 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.023 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1200939109 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gku1370 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.1009898107 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.1702383114 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.033 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2012, Dissection of Pol II Trigger Loop Function and Pol II Activity-Dependent Control of Start Site Selection In Vivo, Plos Genet, 8, 172
  22. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.008 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nsmb.1732 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nature09785 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1126/science.1168729 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.017 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1315751111 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.020 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/1741-7007-8-54 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.034 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/emboj.2011.396 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007158 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/sciadv.1701484 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004532 · DOI
  35. 2014, Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
  36. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2020, Machine learning for protein folding and dynamics, Curr Opin Struc Biol, 60, 77, 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.005 · DOI
  38. 2020, Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature, 577, 706, 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2020, Machine learning techniques for protein function prediction, Proteins, 88, 397, 10.1002/prot.25832 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nmeth.2340 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2019, DEEPred: Automated Protein Function Prediction with Multi-task Feed-forward Deep Neural Networks, Sci Rep-Uk, 9, 7344, 10.1038/s41598-019-43708-3 · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107353 · DOI
  44. 2019, iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations, Proteins, 87, 110, 10.1002/prot.25630 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2020, Prediction of mutation effects using a deep temporal convolutional network, Bioinformatics, 36, 2047, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz873 · DOI
  46. 2017, When loss-of-function is loss of function: assessing mutational signatures and impact of loss-of-function genetic variants, Bioinformatics, 33, I389, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx272 · DOI
  47. 2015, Structure Based Thermostability Prediction Models for Protein Single Point Mutations with Machine Learning Tools, Plos One, 10, e0138022, 10.1371/journal.pone.0138022 · DOI
  48. C. W, 2018, Time-lagged autoencoders: Deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kinetics, J Chem Phys, 148, 241703, 10.1063/1.5011399 · DOI
  49. 2019, Coupling Molecular Dynamics and Deep Learning to Mine Protein Conformational Space, Structure, 27, 1034, 10.1016/j.str.2019.03.018 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 2018, VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics, Nat Commun, 9, 5, 10.1038/s41467-017-02388-1 · DOI
  52. 2021, Deep learning the structural determinants of protein biochemical properties by comparing structural ensembles with DiffNets, Nat Commun, 12, 3023, 10.1038/s41467-021-23246-1 · DOI
  53. 10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  55. 10.1021/ct300400x · DOI
  56. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  57. 10.1021/jz201501a · DOI
  58. 10.1021/ct5010406 · DOI
  59. 10.1021/ct300857j · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.12.005 · DOI
  61. 2015, Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
  62. 2016, TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
  63. 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Dutagaci, B., Duan, B., Qiu, C., Kaplan, C. D., & Feig, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Dutagaci, Bercem
  • Feig, Michael
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-12
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
e1010999-e1010999
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4353016412
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (TG-MCB090003)
  • Michigan State University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097260, R35 GM14116, R35GM144116, R35GM126948)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
RNA polymerase II, trigger loop, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, amino acid mutations, transcriptional fidelity, loss-of-function mutations, gain-of-function mutations, lethal mutations, bridge helix, hydrophobic interactions, variational autoencoder, protein conformational change
MeSH terms
Mutation, RNA Polymerase II, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review