The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of RNA Polymerase II Trigger Loop Mutations using Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Machine Learning
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010999 · Paper page
Abstract
Catalysis and fidelity of multisubunit RNA polymerases rely on a highly conserved active site domain called the trigger loop (TL), which achieves roles in transcription through conformational changes and interaction with NTP substrates. The mutations of TL residues cause distinct effects on catalysis including hypo- and hyperactivity and altered fidelity. We applied molecular dynamics simulation (MD) and machine learning (ML) techniques to characterize TL mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) system. We did so to determine relationships between individual mutations and phenotypes and to associate phenotypes with MD simulated structural alterations. Using fitness values of mutants under various stress conditions, we modeled phenotypes along a spectrum of continual values. We found that ML could predict the phenotypes with 0.68 R 2 correlation from amino acid sequences alone. It was more difficult to incorporate MD data to improve predictions from machine learning, presumably because MD data is too noisy and possibly incomplete to directly infer functional phenotypes. However, a variational auto-encoder model based on the MD data allowed the clustering of mutants with different phenotypes based on structural details. Overall, we found that lethal mutations tended to increase distances of TL residues to the NTP substrate, while viable loss-of-function (LOF) substitutions tended to confer an increase in distances between TL and bridge helix (BH). In contrast, GOF mutants generally have a disrupting effect on hydrophobic contacts among TL and nearby helices. AUTHOR SUMMARY: RNA polymerase II (Pol II) synthesizes RNA with the help of an active site domain called trigger loop (TL). The mutations of TL cause changes in the activity of Pol II that could range from gain-of function (GOF) to loss-of-function (LOF) or lethal. This study provides a systematic characterization of the structural and functional outcomes of the TL mutations using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and machine learning (ML). We obtained functional phenotypes of mutants by ML using the genetic fitness scores as the input. We revealed that mutant TL sequences could predict the functional outcomes at a relatively high correlation. Then, we performed MD simulations to relate the structural information to the phenotypes. The analysis of the MD data suggested that the lethal mutants had increased distances between the TL and the substrate, while a subset of LOF mutants showed increased distances between TL and another active site domain called bridge helix (BH). On the other hand, GOF mutants had effects on the hydrophobic interactions around the active site. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of the effects of TL mutations to the Pol II function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1126/science.1059493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1059495 · DOI
- 2013, Basic mechanisms of RNA polymerase II activity and alteration of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bba-Gene Regul Mech, 1829, 39
- 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.08.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr400046x · DOI
- 2016, Elucidation of the Dynamics of Transcription Elongation by RNA Polymerase II using Kinetic Network Models, Accounts Chem Res, 49, 687, 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00536 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0704138104 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks383 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05931 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.060 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1920427117 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1200939109 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gku1370 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1009898107 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1702383114 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.033 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, Dissection of Pol II Trigger Loop Function and Pol II Activity-Dependent Control of Start Site Selection In Vivo, Plos Genet, 8, 172
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.1732 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09785 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1168729 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.017 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1315751111 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.020 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-8-54 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.034 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2011.396 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007158 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1701484 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004532 · DOI
- 2014, Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Machine learning for protein folding and dynamics, Curr Opin Struc Biol, 60, 77, 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.005 · DOI
- 2020, Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature, 577, 706, 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Machine learning techniques for protein function prediction, Proteins, 88, 397, 10.1002/prot.25832 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2340 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, DEEPred: Automated Protein Function Prediction with Multi-task Feed-forward Deep Neural Networks, Sci Rep-Uk, 9, 7344, 10.1038/s41598-019-43708-3 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0107353 · DOI
- 2019, iSEE: Interface structure, evolution, and energy-based machine learning predictor of binding affinity changes upon mutations, Proteins, 87, 110, 10.1002/prot.25630 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Prediction of mutation effects using a deep temporal convolutional network, Bioinformatics, 36, 2047, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz873 · DOI
- 2017, When loss-of-function is loss of function: assessing mutational signatures and impact of loss-of-function genetic variants, Bioinformatics, 33, I389, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx272 · DOI
- 2015, Structure Based Thermostability Prediction Models for Protein Single Point Mutations with Machine Learning Tools, Plos One, 10, e0138022, 10.1371/journal.pone.0138022 · DOI
- C. W, 2018, Time-lagged autoencoders: Deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kinetics, J Chem Phys, 148, 241703, 10.1063/1.5011399 · DOI
- 2019, Coupling Molecular Dynamics and Deep Learning to Mine Protein Conformational Space, Structure, 27, 1034, 10.1016/j.str.2019.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics, Nat Commun, 9, 5, 10.1038/s41467-017-02388-1 · DOI
- 2021, Deep learning the structural determinants of protein biochemical properties by comparing structural ensembles with DiffNets, Nat Commun, 12, 3023, 10.1038/s41467-021-23246-1 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.9.9.1753 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct300400x · DOI
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- 10.1021/jz201501a · DOI
- 10.1021/ct5010406 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct300857j · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.12.005 · DOI
- 2015, Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
- 2016, TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Dutagaci, B., Duan, B., Qiu, C., Kaplan, C. D., & Feig, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Merced (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dutagaci, Bercem
- Feig, Michael
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-08-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1010999-e1010999
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10069792
- OpenAlex
- W4353016412
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (TG-MCB090003)
- Michigan State University
- National Institutes of Health
- College of Engineering, Michigan State University
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097260, R35 GM14116, R35GM144116, R35GM126948)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- RNA polymerase II, trigger loop, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, amino acid mutations, transcriptional fidelity, loss-of-function mutations, gain-of-function mutations, lethal mutations, bridge helix, hydrophobic interactions, variational autoencoder, protein conformational change
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, RNA Polymerase II, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription, Genetic, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review