The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating phylogenetics with intron positions illuminates the origin of the complex spliceosome
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/molbev/msad011 · Paper page
Abstract
Eukaryotic genes are characterised by the presence of introns that are removed from the pre-mRNA by the spliceosome. This ribonucleoprotein complex is comprised of multiple RNA molecules and over a hundred proteins, which makes it one of the most complex molecular machines that originated during the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition. Previous work has established that these introns and the spliceosomal core originated from self-splicing introns in prokaryotes. Yet it remains largely elusive how the spliceosomal core expanded by recruiting many additional proteins. In this study we use phylogenetic analyses to infer the evolutionary history of the 145 proteins that we could trace back to the spliceosome in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). We found that an overabundance of proteins derived from ribosome-related processes were added to the prokaryote-derived core. Extensive duplications of these proteins substantially increased the complexity of the emerging spliceosome. By comparing the intron positions between spliceosomal paralogs, we infer that most spliceosomal complexity postdates the spread of introns through the proto-eukaryotic genome. The reconstruction of early spliceosomal evolution provides insight into the driving forces behind the emergence of complexes with many proteins during eukaryogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 98
- 2003, Structure and function of archaeal box C/D sRNP core proteins, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 10, 256, 10.1038/nsb905 · DOI
- 2019, Identifying clusters of high confidence homologies in multiple sequence alignments, Mol. Biol. Evol, 36, 2340, 10.1093/molbev/msz142 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/30.7.1427 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abg0879 · DOI
- Baños H , Susko E , Roger AJ . 2022. Are profile mixture models over-parameterized? Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.18.481053v1. · DOI
- 2021, Conservation of archaeal C/D box sRNA-guided RNA modifications, Front. Microbiol, 12, 654029, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.654029 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3176 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80292-0 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.111.189019 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr1043 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90377-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkh603 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msi091 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn226 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002150 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.044255.114 · DOI
- 2020, Broccoli: Combining Phylogenetic and Network Analyses for Orthology Assignment, Mol. Biol. Evol, 37, 3389, 10.1093/molbev/msaa159 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1420657112 · DOI
- 2021, Benchmarking orthology methods using phylogenetic patterns defined at the base of Eukaryotes, Brief. Bioinform, 22, bbaa206, 10.1093/bib/bbaa206 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007301 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.2396011 · DOI
- 2020, Recurrent sequence evolution after independent gene duplication, BMC Evol. Biol, 20, 98, 10.1186/s12862-020-01660-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.101378 · DOI
- 2021, “Sifarchaeota,” a Novel Asgard Phylum from Costa Rican Sediment Capable of Polysaccharide Degradation and Anaerobic Methylotrophy, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 87, e02584
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature10724 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/msx281 · DOI · Paper page
- 1985, U1 snRNA: The evolution of its primary and secondary structure, J. Mol. Evol, 21, 323, 10.1007/BF02115650 · DOI
- 2019, Inferring the Evolutionary History of Your Favorite Protein: A Guide for Molecular Biologists, BioEssays, 41, 1900006, 10.1002/bies.201900006 · DOI
- 2019, New Microbial Lineages Capable of Carbon Fixation and Nutrient Cycling in Deep-Sea Sediments of the Northern South China Sea, Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 85, e00523
- 2019, Patterns of conservation of spliceosomal intron structures and spliceosome divergence in representatives of the diplomonad and parabasalid lineages, BMC Evol. Biol, 19, 162, 10.1186/s12862-019-1488-y · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msx148. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkv1248 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1916 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.800308 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4285 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Group II intron and repeat-rich red algal mitochondrial genomes demonstrate the dynamic recent history of autocatalytic RNAs, BMC Biol, 20, 2, 10.1186/s12915-021-01200-3 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M208856200 · DOI
- 2021, Diversity of LSM Family Proteins: Similarities and Differences, Biochem. (Mosc, 86, S38, 10.1134/S0006297921140042 · DOI
- 2021, Expanded diversity of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes, Nature, 593, 553, 10.1038/s41586-021-03494-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41396-018-0060-x · DOI
- 2021, The Archaeal Elongation Factor EF-2 Induces the Release of aIF6 From 50S Ribosomal Subunit, Front. Microbiol, 12, 631297, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.631297 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki775 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.3.12.1316 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04653.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04531 · DOI
- McKinney W. 2010. Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2010). Austin (TX). p. 56–61. · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Distinct Expansion of Group II Introns During Evolution of Prokaryotes and Possible Factors Involved in Its Regulation, Front. Microbiol, 13, 849080, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.849080 · DOI
- Monzon V , Paysan-Lafosse T , Wood V , Bateman A. 2022. Reciprocal Best Structure Hits: Using AlphaFold models to discover distant homologues. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.04.498216v1. · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Comprehensive database and evolutionary dynamics of U12-type introns, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, 7066
- 10.4161/rna.24538 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evy154 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msu300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/emboj/cdf544 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature16941 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, Drosophila SNF/D25 combines the functions of the two snRNP proteins U1A and U2B’ that are encoded separately in human, potato, and yeast, RNA, 2, 11
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsmb.3220 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05228 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-09364-x · DOI
- 10.1080/10635150290069913 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Recoding of stop codons expands the metabolic potential of two novel Asgardarchaeota lineages, ISME COMMUN, 1, 30, 10.1038/s43705-021-00032-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0114083 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsob.160315 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1821945116 · DOI
- 2018, The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans, Sci. Data, 5, 170203, 10.1038/sdata.2017.203 · DOI
- 2013, The significant other: splicing by the minor spliceosome, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA, 4, 61, 10.1002/wrna.1141 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000315 · DOI
- 2021, Timing the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity with ancient duplications, Nat. Ecol. Evol, 5, 92, 10.1038/s41559-020-01320-z · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, The spread of the first introns in proto-eukaryotic paralogs, Commun. Biol, 5, 476, 10.1038/s42003-022-03426-5 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13062-017-0201-6 · DOI
- 2021, seaborn: statistical data visualization, J. Open Source Softw, 6, 3021, 10.21105/joss.03021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00137-9 · DOI
- 2018, Molecular principles underlying dual RNA specificity in the Drosophila SNF protein, Nat. Commun, 9, 2220, 10.1038/s41467-018-04561-6 · DOI
- van Wijk LM , Snel B. 2020. The first eukaryotic kinome tree illuminates the dynamic history of present-day kinases. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.27.920793v2. · DOI
- 2020, RNA Splicing by the Spliceosome, Annu. Rev. Biochem, 89, 359, 10.1146/annurev-biochem-091719-064225 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.7320604 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi100374d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.031 · DOI
- 2021, Chromosomal instability by mutations in the novel minor spliceosome component CENATAC, EMBO J, 40, e106536, 10.15252/embj.2020106536 · DOI
- 2022, The evolution of pre-mRNA splicing and its machinery revealed by reduced extremophilic red algae, J. Eukaryot. Microbiol, n/a, e12927
- 2022, Unique mobile elements and scalable gene flow at the prokaryote–eukaryote boundary revealed by circularized Asgard archaea genomes, Nat. Microbiol, 7, 200, 10.1038/s41564-021-01039-y · DOI
- 10.1038/nature21031 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Crystal structures of a group II intron maturase reveal a missing link in spliceosome evolution, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 23, 558, 10.1038/nsmb.3224 · DOI
- 2021, Helarchaeota and co-occurring sulfate-reducing bacteria in subseafloor sediments from the Costa Rica Margin, ISME COMMUN, 1, 25, 10.1038/s43705-021-00027-x · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/29.5.1238 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13100-015-0037-5 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Vosseberg, J., Stolker, D., von der Dunk, S. H. A., & Snel, B.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Snel, Berend
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-09-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9887622
- OpenAlex
- W4315754074
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.160.638)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- spliceosome evolution, introns, eukaryotic origin, last eukaryotic common ancestor, spliceosomal proteins, gene duplication, intron positions, self-splicing introns, phylogenetic inference
- MeSH terms
- Introns, Phylogeny, RNA Splicing, Spliceosomes, Evolution, Molecular, Eukaryota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review