The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure-based prediction of Ras-effector binding affinities and design of ‘branchegetic’ interface mutations
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.str.2023.04.007
Abstract
Summary: Ras is a central cellular hub protein controlling multiple cell fates. How Ras interacts with a variety of potential effector proteins is relatively unexplored, with only some key effectors characterized in great detail. Here, we have used homology modelling based on X-ray and AlphaFold2 templates to build structural models for 54 Ras-effectors complexes. These models were used to estimate binding affinities using a supervised learning regressor. Furthermore, we systematically introduced Ras ‘branch-pruning’ (or branchegetic) mutations to identify 200 interface mutations that affect the binding energy with at least one of the model structures. The impacts of these branchegetic mutants were integrated into a mathematical model to assess the potential for rewiring interactions at the Ras hub on a systems level. These findings have provided a quantitative understanding of Ras-effector interfaces and their impact on systems properties of a key cellular hub.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1515/hsz-2019-0330 · DOI
- 10.1038/341209a0 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07409.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/21541248.2020.1724596 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41540-021-00170-0 · DOI
- 10.3390/biom11020236 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12964-022-00823-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.2004560 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01741-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.015 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm336 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fonc.2019.00965 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41573-020-0068-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/msb.2009.80 · DOI
- 10.1002/msb.20145092 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-1468-6_4 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab866 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cpbi.3 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007219 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21715 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt560 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.57264 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abm4805 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/tisb.26938 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100314 · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20121755 · DOI
- 10.3892/or.2014.3387 · DOI
- 10.12688/f1000research.17456.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.050 · DOI
- 10.1126/scisignal.2000397 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1062023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz1035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsb1203-980 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkl091 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662 · DOI
- 10.1145/304181.304187 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.15252/msb.20188503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100626 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15351-4 · DOI
- 10.21105/joss.01686 · DOI · Paper page
- Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag). · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Junk, P., & Kiel, C.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Junk, Philipp
- Venue
- Structure
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-09-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 870-883.e5
- ISSN
- 0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4376113646
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Structure (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland (16/FRL/3886)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- Ras, binding affinity prediction, interaction rewiring, homology modeling, AlphaFold2, binding energy, system-level modeling
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, Protein Binding, Proteins, ras Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review