PreprintCited by 49Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DPAM: A Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4548

Abstract

The recent breakthroughs in structure prediction, where methods such as AlphaFold demonstrated near atomic accuracy, herald a paradigm shift in structure biology. The 200 million high-accuracy models released in the AlphaFold Database are expected to guide protein science in the coming decades. Partitioning these AlphaFold models into domains and subsequently assigning them to our evolutionary hierarchy provides an efficient way to gain functional insights of proteins. However, classifying such a large number of predicted structures challenges the infrastructure of current structure classifications, including our Evolutionary Classification of protein Domains (ECOD). Better computational tools are urgently needed to automatically parse and classify domains from AlphaFold models. Here we present a Domain Parser for AlphaFold Models (DPAM) that can automatically recognize globular domains from these models based on predicted aligned errors, inter-residue distances in 3D structures, and ECOD domains found by sequence (HHsuite) and structural (DALI) similarity searches. Based on a benchmark of 18,759 AlphaFold models, we demonstrated that DPAM could recognize 99.5% domains and assign correct boundaries for 85.2% of them, significantly outperforming structure-based domain parsers and homology-based domain assignment using ECOD domains found by HHsuite or DALI. Application of DPAM to the massive set of AlphaFold models will allow for more efficient classification of domains, providing evolutionary contexts and facilitating functional studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.09.22.509116

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1042/BST0370751 · DOI
  2. 2019, Functional analysis of Rossmann-like domains reveals convergent evolution of topology and reaction pathways, PLoS Comput. Biol, 15, e1007569, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007569 · DOI
  3. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/nar/26.1.320 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/29.1.37 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkz1064 · DOI
  8. 2021, CATH: increased structural coverage of functional space, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003926 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/pro.3331 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/gki408 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · DOI
  14. Kinch, L.N. , et al., Topology evaluation of models for difficult targets in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction. Proteins, 2021. · DOI
  15. 2021, Target classification in the 14th round of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP14), Proteins, 89, 1618, 10.1002/prot.26202 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mace, K. , et al., Cryo-EM structure of a type IV secretion system. Nature, 2022. · DOI
  18. 2022, Structure of cytoplasmic ring of nuclear pore complex by integrative cryo-EM and AlphaFold, Science, 376, eabm9326, 10.1126/science.abm9326 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2021, AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine, Nat. Med, 27, 1666, 10.1038/s41591-021-01533-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2021, Could AlphaFold revolutionize chemical therapeutics?, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 28, 771, 10.1038/s41594-021-00670-x · DOI
  21. 2018, Searching ECOD for Homologous Domains by Sequence and Structure, Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, 61, e45, 10.1002/cpbi.45 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2019, Benchmarking fold detection by DaliLite v.5, Bioinformatics, 35, 5326, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz536 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg006 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/prot.340190309 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, J., Schaeffer, R. D., Durham, J., Cong, Q., & Grishin, N. V.
Affiliations
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cong, Qian
  • Grishin, Nick V.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-09-23
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
e4548-e4548
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312032102
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (GM127390, 2224128)
  • Welch Foundation (I‐1505, I‐1505 to NVG, I-2095-20220331, I-2095)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP210041)
  • Southwestern Medical Foundation (RP210041)
  • National Institutes of Health (I-2095-20220331, RP210041)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM127390, R35GM127390, R01GM147367)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold, ECOD, protein structure prediction
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Proteins, Software, Evolution, Molecular, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review